Geiger G, Aliyev R M
Fachklinik für medizinische Rehabilitation Reinhardtshöhe, Quellenstraße 8-12, 34537, Bad Wildungen-Reinhardshausen, Deutschland.
Unfallchirurg. 2012 Jul;115(7):629-34. doi: 10.1007/s00113-011-2151-2.
Depending on the type of collision, car occupants who are involved in traffic accidents are often exposed to the unexpected effects on the cervical spine of traumatic stimuli from different directions. In a rear-end collision or a frontal collision of the car it is most likely that there is an effect of linear acceleration and a lateral or side impact acceleration of axial rotation on the cervical spine. The neuro-otological manifestations of whiplash injuries that can occur in response to various trauma mechanisms have not yet been sufficiently investigated.
Data from 64 patients who suffered a whiplash injury were selected for analysis. In 32 patients the trauma mechanism was a sudden action on the cervical spine from a linear impulse caused by a head-on collision of cars or rear-end collision. In the other 32 patients the trauma mechanism was a sudden action of an axial neck rotation at a side impact collision or a cross collision. The study compared the results of neuro-otological findings between the two patient groups.
A comparison of the neuro-otological examination data of 64 patients revealed that there were 32 patients who had a sudden injury mechanism of cervical axial rotation, the prevalence of central vestibular and sensory impairments, such as pathological central nystagmus disinhibition, pathological changes in the auditory brainstem evoked potentials (ABEP), the auditory evoked cortical potentials (ALEP) and visual evoked potentials (VEP). In the second group of patients where the injury mechanism consisted of an unexpected linear momentum, peripheral vestibular and sensory disorders were predominant.
The observed differences in neuro-otological manifestations of whiplash trauma, which occur depending on the trauma mechanism, can be used for differential diagnostic purposes. The whiplash injuries of the cervical spine induced by an axial rotation acceleration showed a prevalence of central vestibular and sensory disturbances, while the whiplash injuries of the cervical spine induced by a linear acceleration showed a prevalence of peripheral vestibular, sensory and vestibulospinal disorders. Our data thus show in the first group of patients a prevalence of retrocochlear, supratentorial and subcortical lesions of the auditory tract, and brain lesions of the optic tract in the occipital pole and in the visual cortex.
根据碰撞类型,交通事故中的车内乘客常常会受到来自不同方向的创伤性刺激对颈椎产生的意外影响。在汽车追尾碰撞或正面碰撞中,颈椎很可能会受到线性加速度以及轴向旋转的横向或侧面冲击加速度的影响。因各种创伤机制而可能发生的挥鞭伤的神经耳科表现尚未得到充分研究。
选取64例患有挥鞭伤的患者的数据进行分析。其中32例患者的创伤机制是汽车正面碰撞或追尾碰撞产生的线性冲力对颈椎的突然作用。另外32例患者的创伤机制是侧面碰撞或交叉碰撞时颈部的突然轴向旋转。该研究比较了两组患者的神经耳科检查结果。
对64例患者的神经耳科检查数据进行比较后发现,有32例患者存在颈椎轴向旋转的突然损伤机制,其中心前庭和感觉障碍的发生率较高,如病理性中枢性眼球震颤抑制、听觉脑干诱发电位(ABEP)、听觉诱发电位(ALEP)和视觉诱发电位(VEP)的病理变化。在第二组损伤机制为意外线性动量的患者中,外周前庭和感觉障碍占主导。
根据创伤机制不同而观察到的挥鞭伤神经耳科表现差异可用于鉴别诊断。轴向旋转加速度导致的颈椎挥鞭伤表现为中心前庭和感觉障碍,而线性加速度导致的颈椎挥鞭伤则以外周前庭、感觉和前庭脊髓障碍为主。我们的数据因此显示,在第一组患者中,听觉通路的蜗后、幕上和皮质下病变以及枕叶和视觉皮质的视路脑部病变发生率较高。