Ziegler Thomas R, May Addison K, Hebbar Gautam, Easley Kirk A, Griffith Daniel P, Dave Nisha, Collier Bryan R, Cotsonis George A, Hao Li, Leong Traci, Manatunga Amita K, Rosenberg Eli S, Jones Dean P, Martin Gregory S, Jensen Gordon L, Sax Harry C, Kudsk Kenneth A, Galloway John R, Blumberg Henry M, Evans Mary E, Wischmeyer Paul E
*Division of Endocrinology, Metabolism and Lipids, Department of Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA †Center for Clinical and Molecular Nutrition, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA ‡Emory University Hospital Nutrition and Metabolic Support Service, Atlanta, GA §Department of Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN ¶Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA ||Department of Surgery, Virginia Technical Institute Carilion School of Medicine, Roanoke, VA **Department of Epidemiology, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA ††Division of Pulmonary, Allergy and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA ‡‡Department of Nutritional Sciences, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA §§Department of Surgery, Miriam Hospital, Providence, RI ¶¶Department of Surgery, Cedars Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA ||||Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin, Schools of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI ***Department of Surgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA †††Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA; Hubert Department of Global Health Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA ‡‡‡National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, Bethesda, MD §§§Department of Anesthesiology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO.
Ann Surg. 2016 Apr;263(4):646-55. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001487.
To determine whether glutamine (GLN)-supplemented parenteral nutrition (PN) improves clinical outcomes in surgical intensive care unit (SICU) patients.
GLN requirements may increase with critical illness. GLN-supplemented PN may improve clinical outcomes in SICU patients.
A parallel-group, multicenter, double-blind, randomized, controlled clinical trial in 150 adults after gastrointestinal, vascular, or cardiac surgery requiring PN and SICU care. Patients were without significant renal or hepatic failure or shock at entry. All received isonitrogenous, isocaloric PN [1.5 g/kg/d amino acids (AAs) and energy at 1.3× estimated basal energy expenditure]. Controls (n = 75) received standard GLN-free PN (STD-PN); the GLN group (n = 75) received PN containing alanyl-GLN dipeptide (0.5 g/kg/d), proportionally replacing AA in PN (GLN-PN). Enteral nutrition (EN) was advanced and PN weaned as indicated. Hospital mortality and infections were primary endpoints.
Baseline characteristics, days on study PN and daily macronutrient intakes via PN and EN, were similar between groups. There were 11 hospital deaths (14.7%) in the GLN-PN group and 13 deaths in the STD-PN group (17.3%; difference, -2.6%; 95% confidence interval, -14.6% to 9.3%; P = 0.66). The 6-month cumulative mortality was 31.4% in the GLN-PN group and 29.7% in the STD-PN group (P = 0.88). Incident bloodstream infection rate was 9.6 and 8.4 per 1000 hospital days in the GLN-PN and STD-PN groups, respectively (P = 0.73). Other clinical outcomes and adverse events were similar.
PN supplemented with GLN dipeptide was safe, but did not alter clinical outcomes among SICU patients.
确定补充谷氨酰胺(GLN)的肠外营养(PN)是否能改善外科重症监护病房(SICU)患者的临床结局。
危重病时对GLN的需求可能增加。补充GLN的PN可能改善SICU患者的临床结局。
一项平行组、多中心、双盲、随机、对照临床试验,纳入150例接受PN及SICU治疗的胃肠、血管或心脏手术后的成年患者。入组时患者无严重肾或肝功能衰竭或休克。所有患者均接受等氮、等热量PN[1.5g/(kg·d)氨基酸(AAs),能量为预计基础能量消耗的1.3倍]。对照组(n = 75)接受不含GLN的标准PN(STD-PN);GLN组(n = 75)接受含丙氨酰-GLN二肽(0.5g/(kg·d))的PN,按比例替代PN中的AAs(GLN-PN)。根据指征推进肠内营养(EN)并停用PN。医院死亡率和感染是主要终点。
两组间基线特征、接受研究PN的天数以及通过PN和EN的每日常量营养素摄入量相似。GLN-PN组有11例医院死亡(14.7%),STD-PN组有13例死亡(17.3%;差异为-2.6%;95%置信区间为-14.6%至9.3%;P = 0.66)。GLN-PN组6个月累积死亡率为31.4%,STD-PN组为29.7%(P = 0.88)。GLN-PN组和STD-PN组的医院日血流感染发生率分别为每1000个医院日9.6例和8.4例(P = 0.73)。其他临床结局和不良事件相似。
补充GLN二肽的PN是安全的,但并未改变SICU患者的临床结局。