Srinivasan Subashini, Kroeker Randall M, Gabriel Simon, Plotnik Adam, Godinez Sergio R, Hu Peng, Halnon Nancy, Finn J Paul, Ennis Daniel B
Department of Radiological Sciences, University of California, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Department of Bioengineering, University of California, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Magn Reson Med. 2016 Oct;76(4):1210-6. doi: 10.1002/mrm.26011. Epub 2015 Oct 28.
To develop a free-breathing variable flip angle (VFA) balanced steady-state free precession (bSSFP) cardiac cine imaging technique with reduced specific absorption rate (SAR) at 3 Tesla.
Free-breathing VFA (FB-VFA) images in the short-axis and four-chamber views were acquired using an optimal VFA scheme, then compared with conventional breath-hold constant flip angle (BH-CFA) acquisitions. Two cardiac MRI experts used a 5-point scale to score images from healthy subjects (N = 10). The left ventricular ejection fraction, end diastolic volume (LVEDV), end systolic volume, stroke volume (LVSV), and end diastolic myocardial mass (LVEDM) were determined by manual contour analysis for BH-CFA and FB-VFA. A pilot evaluation of FB-VFA was performed in one patient with Duchenne muscular dystrophy.
FB-VFA SAR was 25% lower than BH-CFA with similar blood-myocardium contrast. The qualitative FB-VFA score was lower than the BH-CFA for the short-axis (3.1 ± 0.5 versus 4.3 ± 0.8; P < 0.05) and the four-chamber view (3.4 ± 0.4 versus 4.6 ± 0.6; P < 0.05). The LVEDV and the LVSV were 5% and 12% larger (P < 0.05) for FB-VFA compared with BH-CFA. There was no difference in LVEDM.
FB-VFA bSSFP cardiac cine imaging decreased the SAR at 3T with image quality sufficient to perform cardiac functional analysis. Magn Reson Med 76:1210-1216, 2016. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
开发一种自由呼吸可变翻转角(VFA)平衡稳态自由进动(bSSFP)心脏电影成像技术,以降低3特斯拉时的比吸收率(SAR)。
采用最佳VFA方案采集短轴和四腔心视图的自由呼吸VFA(FB-VFA)图像,然后与传统屏气恒定翻转角(BH-CFA)采集进行比较。两位心脏MRI专家使用5分制对健康受试者(N = 10)的图像进行评分。通过对BH-CFA和FB-VFA进行手动轮廓分析来确定左心室射血分数、舒张末期容积(LVEDV)、收缩末期容积、每搏输出量(LVSV)和舒张末期心肌质量(LVEDM)。对一名杜氏肌营养不良患者进行了FB-VFA的初步评估。
FB-VFA的SAR比BH-CFA低25%,且血心肌对比度相似。短轴(3.1±0.5对4.3±0.8;P<0.05)和四腔心视图(3.4±0.4对4.6±0.6;P<0.05)的FB-VFA定性评分低于BH-CFA。与BH-CFA相比,FB-VFA的LVEDV和LVSV分别大5%和12%(P<0.05)。LVEDM无差异。
FB-VFA bSSFP心脏电影成像降低了3T时的SAR,图像质量足以进行心脏功能分析。《磁共振医学》76:1210 - 1216,2016年。©2015威利期刊公司。