Bates H, Randall S K, Rayssiguier C, Bridges B A, Goodman M F, Radman M
Medical Research Council Cell Mutation Unit, University of Sussex, Brighton, England.
J Bacteriol. 1989 May;171(5):2480-4. doi: 10.1128/jb.171.5.2480-2484.1989.
The induction of mutations to valine resistance and to rifampin resistance occurs after UV irradiation in bacteria carrying a deletion through the polA gene (delta polA), showing that DNA polymerase I (PolI) is not an essential enzyme for this process. The PolI deletion strain showed a 7- to 10-fold-higher spontaneous mutation frequency than the wild type. The presence in the deletion strain of the 5'----3' exonuclease fragment on an F' episome caused an additional 10-fold increase in spontaneous mutation frequency, resulting in mutation frequencies on the order of 50- to 100-fold greater than wild type. The mutator effect associated with the 5'----3' exonuclease gene fragment together with much of the effect attributable to the polA deletion was blocked in bacteria carrying a umuC mutation. The mutator activity therefore appears to reflect constitutive SOS induction. Excision-proficient polA deletion strains exhibited increased sensitivity to the lethal effect of UV light which was only partially ameliorated by the presence of polA+ on an F' episome. The UV-induced mutation rate to rifampin resistance was marginally lower in delta polA bacteria than in bacteria carrying the polA+ allele. This effect is unlikely to be caused by the existence of a PolI-dependent mutagenic pathway and is probably an indirect effect caused by an alteration in the pattern of excision repair, since it did not occur in excision-deficient (uvrA) bacteria. An excision-deficient polA deletion strain possessed UV sensitivity similar to that of an isogenic strain carrying polA+ on an F' episome, showing that none of the functions of PolI are needed for postreplication repair in the absence of excision repair. Our data provide no evidence for a pathway of UV mutagenesis dependent on PolI, although it remains an open question whether PolI is able to participate when it is present.
在携带通过polA基因缺失(δpolA)的细菌中,紫外线照射后会诱导产生对缬氨酸抗性和利福平抗性的突变,这表明DNA聚合酶I(PolI)不是此过程所必需的酶。PolI缺失菌株的自发突变频率比野生型高7至10倍。F'附加体上5'→3'核酸外切酶片段在缺失菌株中的存在使自发突变频率额外增加了10倍,导致突变频率比野生型高50至100倍。与5'→3'核酸外切酶基因片段相关的诱变效应以及大部分归因于polA缺失的效应在携带umuC突变的细菌中被阻断。因此,诱变活性似乎反映了组成型SOS诱导。切除功能正常的polA缺失菌株对紫外线的致死效应表现出更高的敏感性,而F'附加体上存在polA +只能部分改善这种敏感性。δpolA细菌中紫外线诱导的对利福平抗性的突变率略低于携带polA +等位基因的细菌。这种效应不太可能是由依赖PolI的诱变途径的存在引起的,可能是由切除修复模式的改变引起的间接效应,因为它在切除缺陷(uvrA)细菌中不发生。切除缺陷的polA缺失菌株具有与F'附加体上携带polA +的同基因菌株相似的紫外线敏感性,这表明在没有切除修复的情况下,复制后修复不需要PolI的任何功能。我们的数据没有提供依赖PolI的紫外线诱变途径的证据,尽管PolI存在时是否能够参与仍然是一个悬而未决的问题。