Liem Madieke I, Schreuder Floris H B M, van Dijk Anouk C, de Rotte Alexandra A J, Truijman Martine T B, Daemen Mat J A P, van der Steen Anton F W, Hendrikse Jeroen, Nederveen Aart J, van der Lugt Aad, Kooi M Eline, Nederkoorn Paul J
From the Department of Neurology, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands (M.I.L., P.J.N.); Department of Radiology, CARIM School for Cardiovascular Diseases (F.H.B.M.S., M.T.B.T., M.E.K.) and Department of Clinical Neurophysiology (F.H.B.M.S., M.T.B.T.), Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands; Departments of Radiology (A.C.v.D., A.v.d.L.), Neurology (A.C.v.D.), and Cardiology (A.F.W.v.d.S.), Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Radiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands (A.A.J.d.R., J.H.); and Departments of Pathology (M.J.A.P.D.) and Radiology (A.J.N.), Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Stroke. 2015 Dec;46(12):3411-5. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.115.008906. Epub 2015 Oct 29.
Intraplaque hemorrhage (IPH), visualized by magnetic resonance imaging, has shown to be associated with the risk of stroke in patients with carotid artery stenosis. The mechanisms of IPH development are poorly understood. In this study, we investigated the association between clinical patient characteristics and carotid IPH on high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging.
Patients participate in the Plaque at Risk (PARISK) study. This prospective, multicenter cohort study included patients with recent amaurosis fugax, hemispheric transient ischemic attack, or nondisabling stroke in the internal carotid artery territory and an ipsilateral carotid stenosis of <70%, who were not scheduled for carotid revascularization procedure. One hundred patients, recruited between 2010 and 2012, underwent a 3-T high-resolution carotid magnetic resonance imaging. We documented clinical patient characteristics and performed multivariable logistic regression analysis to investigate their association with IPH.
IPH was observed in 45 patients (45%) in 1 or both carotid arteries. Male sex and the use of antiplatelet agents before the index event were associated with IPH in univariable analysis. In a multivariable analysis, only previous use of antiplatelet agents was significantly associated with IPH (odds ratio, 2.71; 95% confidence interval, 1.12-6.61). Risk factors of atherosclerotic arterial disease, including a history of symptomatic arterial diseases, were not associated with IPH.
In this cohort of 100 patients with recently symptomatic carotid stenosis, the previous use of antiplatelet agents is associated with carotid IPH on magnetic resonance imaging. Antiplatelet therapy may increase the risk of IPH, but our findings need to be confirmed in larger patient cohorts. The implications for risk stratification remain to be determined.
通过磁共振成像观察到的斑块内出血(IPH)已显示与颈动脉狭窄患者的中风风险相关。IPH发生的机制尚不清楚。在本研究中,我们调查了临床患者特征与高分辨率磁共振成像上颈动脉IPH之间的关联。
患者参与了“斑块风险(PARISK)研究”。这项前瞻性、多中心队列研究纳入了近期有一过性黑矇、半球性短暂性脑缺血发作或颈内动脉区域非致残性卒中且同侧颈动脉狭窄<70%、未计划进行颈动脉血运重建手术的患者。2010年至2012年间招募的100例患者接受了3-T高分辨率颈动脉磁共振成像检查。我们记录了临床患者特征,并进行多变量逻辑回归分析以研究它们与IPH的关联。
在100例患者中,45例(45%)在1条或双侧颈动脉中观察到IPH。单变量分析显示,男性和在索引事件前使用抗血小板药物与IPH相关。在多变量分析中,只有既往使用抗血小板药物与IPH显著相关(比值比,2.71;95%置信区间,1.12 - 6.61)。动脉粥样硬化性动脉疾病的危险因素,包括有症状性动脉疾病史,与IPH无关。
在这100例近期有症状性颈动脉狭窄的患者队列中,既往使用抗血小板药物与磁共振成像上的颈动脉IPH相关。抗血小板治疗可能会增加IPH的风险,但我们的发现需要在更大的患者队列中得到证实。其对风险分层的影响仍有待确定。