Chapman A L, Hadfield M, Chapman C J
AL Chapman, Department of Infectious Diseases, Monklands Hospital, Airdrie ML6 0JS, UK. Email
J R Coll Physicians Edinb. 2015;45(3):201-5. doi: 10.4997/JRCPE.2015.305.
In today's NHS, qualitative research is increasingly important as a method of assessing and improving quality of care. Grounded theory has developed as an analytical approach to qualitative data over the last 40 years. It is primarily an inductive process whereby theoretical insights are generated from data, in contrast to deductive research where theoretical hypotheses are tested via data collection. Grounded theory has been one of the main contributors to the acceptance of qualitative methods in a wide range of applied social sciences. The influence of grounded theory as an approach is, in part, based on its provision of an explicit framework for analysis and theory generation. Furthermore the stress upon grounding research in the reality of participants has also given it credence in healthcare research. As with all analytical approaches, grounded theory has drawbacks and limitations. It is important to have an understanding of these in order to assess the applicability of this approach to healthcare research. In this review we outline the principles of grounded theory, and focus on thematic analysis as the analytical approach used most frequently in grounded theory studies, with the aim of providing clinicians with the skills to critically review studies using this methodology.
在当今的英国国民医疗服务体系(NHS)中,定性研究作为评估和改善医疗质量的一种方法,正变得越来越重要。在过去40年里,扎根理论已发展成为一种用于定性数据的分析方法。它主要是一个归纳过程,即从数据中产生理论见解,这与演绎研究相反,在演绎研究中,理论假设是通过数据收集来检验的。扎根理论一直是众多应用社会科学领域接受定性方法的主要推动因素之一。扎根理论作为一种方法的影响力,部分基于它为分析和理论生成提供了一个明确的框架。此外,强调研究要基于参与者的实际情况,这也使其在医疗保健研究中获得了认可。与所有分析方法一样,扎根理论也有缺点和局限性。了解这些对于评估该方法在医疗保健研究中的适用性很重要。在本综述中,我们概述了扎根理论的原则,并重点关注主题分析,因为它是扎根理论研究中最常用的分析方法,目的是为临床医生提供批判性审视使用该方法的研究的技能。