Suppr超能文献

为何我们需要的不仅仅是随机对照试验来确定在线社交网络对健康行为改变的有效性。

Why we need more than just randomized controlled trials to establish the effectiveness of online social networks for health behavior change.

作者信息

Vandelanotte Corneel, Maher Carol A

出版信息

Am J Health Promot. 2015 Nov-Dec;30(2):74-6. doi: 10.4278/ajhp.141204-CIT-605.

Abstract

Despite their popularity and potential to promote health in large populations, the effectiveness of online social networks (e.g., Facebook) to improve health behaviors has been somewhat disappointing. Most of the research examining the effectiveness of such interventions has used randomized controlled trials (RCTs). It is asserted that the modest outcomes may be due to characteristics specific to both online social networks and RCTs. The highly controlled nature of RCTs stifles the dynamic nature of online social networks. Alternative and ecologically valid research designs that evaluate online social networks in real-life conditions are needed to advance the science in this area.

摘要

尽管在线社交网络(如脸书)广受欢迎且有潜力在大量人群中促进健康,但其改善健康行为的效果却有些令人失望。大多数研究此类干预措施有效性的研究都采用了随机对照试验(RCT)。有人认为,成效不显著可能是由于在线社交网络和随机对照试验所特有的特征。随机对照试验的高度可控性抑制了在线社交网络的动态特性。需要采用替代的、具有生态效度的研究设计,在现实生活条件下评估在线社交网络,以推动该领域的科学发展。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验