• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

移动技术在社区心理健康环境中的应用。

Use of mobile technology in a community mental health setting.

作者信息

Glick Gretl, Druss Benjamin, Pina Jamie, Lally Cathy, Conde Mark

机构信息

Center for Behavioral Health Policy Studies, Emory University, USA

Center for Behavioral Health Policy Studies, Emory University, USA.

出版信息

J Telemed Telecare. 2016 Oct;22(7):430-5. doi: 10.1177/1357633X15613236. Epub 2015 Oct 29.

DOI:10.1177/1357633X15613236
PMID:26519378
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

mHealth holds promise in transforming care for people with serious mental illness (SMI) and other disadvantaged populations. However, information about the rates of smartphone ownership and usage of mobile health apps among people with SMI is limited. The objective of this research is to examine the current ownership, usage patterns, and existing barriers to mobile health interventions for people with SMI treated in a public sector community mental health setting and to compare the findings with national usage patterns from the general population.

METHODS

A survey was conducted to determine rates of ownership of smartphone devices among people with SMI. Surveys were administered to 100 patients with SMI at an outpatient psychiatric clinic. Results were compared with respondents to the 2012 Pew Survey of mobile phone usage.

RESULTS

A total of 85% of participants reported that they owned a cell phone; of those, 37% reported that they owned a smartphone, as compared with 53% of respondents to the Pew Survey and 44% of socioeconomically disadvantaged respondents to the Pew Survey.

DISCUSSION

While cell phone ownership is common among people with SMI, their adoption of smartphone technology lags behind that of the general population primarily due to cost barriers. Efforts to use mHealth in these populations need to recognize current mobile ownership patterns while planning for anticipated expansion of new technologies to poor populations as cost barriers are reduced in the coming years.

摘要

引言

移动健康有望改变对严重精神疾病患者(SMI)及其他弱势群体的护理方式。然而,关于SMI患者中智能手机拥有率及移动健康应用使用情况的信息有限。本研究的目的是调查在公共部门社区心理健康机构接受治疗的SMI患者中移动健康干预措施的当前拥有情况、使用模式及现存障碍,并将研究结果与普通人群的全国使用模式进行比较。

方法

开展一项调查以确定SMI患者中智能手机设备的拥有率。对一家门诊精神科诊所的100名SMI患者进行了调查。将结果与2012年皮尤手机使用调查的受访者进行比较。

结果

共有85%的参与者报告称他们拥有一部手机;其中,37%的人报告称他们拥有一部智能手机,相比之下,皮尤调查的受访者中有53%拥有智能手机,皮尤调查中社会经济地位不利的受访者中有44%拥有智能手机。

讨论

虽然SMI患者中手机拥有情况很普遍,但他们对智能手机技术的采用落后于普通人群,主要原因是成本障碍。在这些人群中使用移动健康的努力需要在规划新技术向贫困人口的预期扩展时认识到当前的移动设备拥有模式,因为未来几年成本障碍会降低。

相似文献

1
Use of mobile technology in a community mental health setting.移动技术在社区心理健康环境中的应用。
J Telemed Telecare. 2016 Oct;22(7):430-5. doi: 10.1177/1357633X15613236. Epub 2015 Oct 29.
2
Is India ready for mental health apps (MHApps)? A quantitative-qualitative exploration of caregivers' perspective on smartphone-based solutions for managing severe mental illnesses in low resource settings.印度是否准备好接受心理健康应用程序(MHApps)?在资源匮乏环境下,基于智能手机的解决方案来管理严重精神疾病,从照顾者的角度对这一问题进行定量-定性探索。
PLoS One. 2018 Sep 19;13(9):e0203353. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0203353. eCollection 2018.
3
Mobile Phone Ownership, Health Apps, and Tablet Use in US Adults With a Self-Reported History of Hypertension: Cross-Sectional Study.美国高血压患者中手机拥有率、健康类应用程序使用情况以及平板电脑使用情况:横断面研究。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2019 Jan 14;7(1):e12228. doi: 10.2196/12228.
4
How people with serious mental illness use smartphones, mobile apps, and social media.患有严重精神疾病的人如何使用智能手机、移动应用程序和社交媒体。
Psychiatr Rehabil J. 2016 Dec;39(4):364-367. doi: 10.1037/prj0000207. Epub 2016 Jun 16.
5
Lack of ownership of mobile phones could hinder the rollout of mHealth interventions in Africa.缺乏移动电话可能会阻碍移动医疗干预措施在非洲的推广。
Elife. 2022 Oct 18;11:e79615. doi: 10.7554/eLife.79615.
6
Acceptability of Interventions Delivered Online and Through Mobile Phones for People Who Experience Severe Mental Health Problems: A Systematic Review.针对有严重心理健康问题的人群,通过网络和手机提供干预措施的可接受性:一项系统综述。
J Med Internet Res. 2016 May 31;18(5):e121. doi: 10.2196/jmir.5250.
7
Use of information and communication technologies among individuals with and without serious mental illness.信息和通信技术在有严重精神疾病和无严重精神疾病个体中的使用情况。
Psychiatry Res. 2018 Aug;266:160-167. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2018.05.026. Epub 2018 May 17.
8
Smartphone Ownership, Smartphone Utilization, and Interest in Using Mental Health Apps to Address Substance Use Disorders: Literature Review and Cross-sectional Survey Study Across Two Sites.智能手机拥有情况、智能手机使用情况以及使用心理健康应用程序来解决物质使用障碍的兴趣:文献综述与跨两个地点的横断面调查研究
JMIR Form Res. 2022 Jul 7;6(7):e38684. doi: 10.2196/38684.
9
Determinants of readiness to adopt mHealth in a rural community of Bangladesh.孟加拉国一个农村社区采用移动健康技术的准备度决定因素。
Int J Med Inform. 2015 Oct;84(10):847-56. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2015.06.008. Epub 2015 Jul 2.
10
Mobile Phone Ownership and Endorsement of "mHealth" Among People With Psychosis: A Meta-analysis of Cross-sectional Studies.精神病患者的手机拥有情况及对“移动健康”的认可:横断面研究的荟萃分析
Schizophr Bull. 2016 Mar;42(2):448-55. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbv132. Epub 2015 Sep 22.

引用本文的文献

1
"Getting people access to services is also getting them access to a phone": Clarifying digital divide dynamics and their consequences in Community Mental Health Care.“让人们获得服务也就是让他们获得一部电话”:阐明社区精神卫生保健中的数字鸿沟动态及其后果。
AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2025 May 22;2024:1245-1254. eCollection 2024.
2
Opportunities and Challenges to Advance Health Equity Using Digital Health Tools in Underserved Communities in Southeast US: A Mixed Methods Study.利用数字健康工具在美东南服务欠缺社区促进健康公平的机遇与挑战:一项混合方法研究。
J Prim Care Community Health. 2023 Jan-Dec;14:21501319231184789. doi: 10.1177/21501319231184789.
3
Use of digital technologies by users of psychiatric inpatient services in Berlin, Germany: a cross-sectional patient survey.
德国柏林精神科住院患者使用数字技术的情况:一项横断面患者调查。
BMJ Open. 2023 Mar 21;13(3):e067311. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-067311.
4
Comparing Professional and Consumer Ratings of Mental Health Apps: Mixed Methods Study.比较心理健康应用程序的专业评级与用户评级:混合方法研究。
JMIR Form Res. 2022 Sep 23;6(9):e39813. doi: 10.2196/39813.
5
Impact of a Digital Intervention for Literacy in Depression among Portuguese University Students: A Randomized Controlled Trial.数字干预对葡萄牙大学生抑郁症识字能力的影响:一项随机对照试验。
Healthcare (Basel). 2022 Jan 15;10(1):165. doi: 10.3390/healthcare10010165.
6
Codesign of a cardiovascular disease prevention text message bank for older adults.为老年人设计心血管疾病预防短信库。
Patient Educ Couns. 2021 Nov;104(11):2772-2784. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2021.03.036. Epub 2021 Apr 1.
7
Digital Interventions for Psychological Comorbidities in Chronic Diseases-A Systematic Review.慢性病心理共病的数字干预——一项系统综述
J Pers Med. 2021 Jan 6;11(1):30. doi: 10.3390/jpm11010030.
8
Social Media and Mental Health: Benefits, Risks, and Opportunities for Research and Practice.社交媒体与心理健康:研究与实践的益处、风险及机遇
J Technol Behav Sci. 2020 Sep;5(3):245-257. doi: 10.1007/s41347-020-00134-x. Epub 2020 Apr 20.
9
Certified Peer Specialists' Perspective of the Barriers and Facilitators to Mobile Health Engagement.认证同伴专家对移动健康参与的障碍和促进因素的看法。
J Technol Behav Sci. 2020 Dec;5(4):318-323. doi: 10.1007/s41347-020-00138-7. Epub 2020 Apr 27.
10
Advancing mental health equality: a mapping review of interventions, economic evaluations and barriers and facilitators.推进心理健康公平:干预措施、经济评估以及障碍和促进因素的映射综述。
Syst Rev. 2020 May 26;9(1):115. doi: 10.1186/s13643-020-01333-6.