Suppr超能文献

掌侧桡骨远端钢板内固定术中平板成像与术后X线平片检测关节内螺钉移位的比较

Comparison of intraoperative flat panel imaging and postoperative plain radiography for the detection of intraarticular screw displacement in volar distal radius plate ostheosynthesis.

作者信息

Borggrefe J, Bolte H, Worms W, Mahlke L, Seekamp A, Menzdorf L, Varoga D, Müller M, Weuster M, Zorenkov D, Wedel T, Lippross S

机构信息

University medical center of Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany; Department of radiology, Uniklinik Köln, Köln, Germany.

University medical center of Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany; Department of nuclear medicine, university-Clinics Münster, Münster, Germany.

出版信息

Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2015 Dec;101(8):913-7. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2015.07.023. Epub 2015 Oct 27.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To investigate if intraoperative 3D flat panel imaging improves the detection of radiocarpal intraarticular screw misplacement (RCSM) in comparison to standard postoperative x-ray.

METHODS

In a study on cadaver specimens, we evaluated the sensitivity and specificity to detect RCSM using X-ray, intraoperative 3D-fluoroscopy as well as the digital volume tomography. The gold standard reference was computed tomography.

RESULTS

Sensitivity for the detection of RCSM for X-ray was 58% and specificity 88%. For DVT, the sensitivity to detect RCSM was 88% and the specificity 53%. For 3D-fluoroscopy, the sensitivity for RCSM was 68% and specificity 95%. When combining the methods, the best performance was found, when combining the two intraoperative imaging methods, with a resulting sensitivity of 88% and a specificity of 73%.

CONCLUSIONS

Intraoperative 3D fluoroscopy and digital volume tomography appear to be at least as sensitive and specific to detect RCSM than the regular postoperative radiography in two planes. However, especially discrete screw misplacements can be missed with either method.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV. Diagnostic device study.

摘要

目的

与标准术后X线相比,研究术中三维平板成像是否能提高桡腕关节内螺钉误置(RCSM)的检测率。

方法

在一项关于尸体标本的研究中,我们使用X线、术中三维荧光透视以及数字容积断层扫描评估检测RCSM的敏感性和特异性。金标准参考为计算机断层扫描。

结果

X线检测RCSM的敏感性为58%,特异性为88%。对于数字容积断层扫描,检测RCSM的敏感性为88%,特异性为53%。对于三维荧光透视,RCSM的敏感性为68%,特异性为95%。当联合使用这些方法时,将两种术中成像方法联合使用时性能最佳,敏感性为88%,特异性为73%。

结论

术中三维荧光透视和数字容积断层扫描在检测RCSM方面似乎至少与常规术后双平面X线摄影一样敏感和特异。然而,两种方法都可能漏诊尤其是轻微的螺钉误置。

证据水平

IV级。诊断设备研究。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验