• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

1型糖尿病儿童非营养性甜味剂的膳食摄入量。

Dietary intake of non-nutritive sweeteners in type 1 diabetes mellitus children.

作者信息

Dewinter Louise, Casteels Kristina, Corthouts Karen, Van de Kerckhove Kristel, Van der Vaerent Katrien, Vanmeerbeeck Kelly, Matthys Christophe

机构信息

a Department of Health and Technology , University College Leuven , Leuven , Belgium.

b Department of Pediatrics , University Hospitals Leuven , Leuven , Belgium.

出版信息

Food Addit Contam Part A Chem Anal Control Expo Risk Assess. 2016;33(1):19-26. doi: 10.1080/19440049.2015.1112039. Epub 2015 Nov 16.

DOI:10.1080/19440049.2015.1112039
PMID:26523968
Abstract

The aims of the current cross-sectional study were (1) to assess the intake of aspartame, cyclamate, acesulfame-k, neohesperidine dihydrochalcone, sucralose, saccharin, steviol glycosides and neotame among children with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1D); (2) to compare the obtained intakes with the respective acceptable daily intake (ADI) values; and (3) to conduct a scenario analysis to obtain practical guidelines for a safe consumption of non-nutritive sweeteners (NNS) among children with T1D. T1D patients of the Paediatrics Department of the University Hospitals Leuven were invited to complete a food frequency questionnaire designed to assess NNS intake using a tier 2 and tier 3 exposure assessment approach. A scenario analysis was conducted by reducing the P95 consumption of the most contributing food categories in order to reach a total sweetener intake lower than or equal to the ADI. Estimated total intakes higher than ADIs were only found for the P95 consumers only of acesulfame-k, cyclamate and steviol glycosides (tier 2 and tier 3 approach). Scenario analysis created dietary guidelines for each age category for diet soda, bread spreads and dairy drinks. There is little chance for T1D children to exceed the ADI of the different NNS, however diabetes educators and dieticians need to pay attention regarding the use of NNS.

摘要

当前这项横断面研究的目的是

(1)评估1型糖尿病(T1D)患儿阿斯巴甜、甜蜜素、安赛蜜、新橙皮苷二氢查耳酮、三氯蔗糖、糖精、甜菊糖苷和纽甜的摄入量;(2)将所获得的摄入量与各自的每日可接受摄入量(ADI)值进行比较;(3)进行情景分析,以获取T1D患儿安全食用非营养性甜味剂(NNS)的实用指南。鲁汶大学医院儿科的T1D患者受邀填写一份食物频率问卷,该问卷旨在使用二级和三级暴露评估方法评估NNS摄入量。通过降低对总摄入量贡献最大的食物类别的第95百分位数消费量来进行情景分析,以使甜味剂总摄入量低于或等于ADI。仅在第95百分位数的安赛蜜、甜蜜素和甜菊糖苷消费者中发现估计总摄入量高于ADI(二级和三级方法)。情景分析为各年龄组的无糖汽水、面包涂抹酱和乳饮料制定了饮食指南。T1D患儿几乎没有机会超过不同NNS的ADI,然而糖尿病教育工作者和营养师在NNS的使用方面需要予以关注。

相似文献

1
Dietary intake of non-nutritive sweeteners in type 1 diabetes mellitus children.1型糖尿病儿童非营养性甜味剂的膳食摄入量。
Food Addit Contam Part A Chem Anal Control Expo Risk Assess. 2016;33(1):19-26. doi: 10.1080/19440049.2015.1112039. Epub 2015 Nov 16.
2
Dietary intake of artificial sweeteners by the Belgian population.比利时人口对人工甜味剂的饮食摄入量。
Food Addit Contam Part A Chem Anal Control Expo Risk Assess. 2012;29(1):54-65. doi: 10.1080/19440049.2011.627572. Epub 2011 Nov 17.
3
Estimated intake of the artificial sweeteners acesulfame-K, aspartame, cyclamate and saccharin in a group of Swedish diabetics.一组瑞典糖尿病患者中人工甜味剂乙酰磺胺酸钾、阿斯巴甜、甜蜜素和糖精的估计摄入量。
Food Addit Contam. 2003 Feb;20(2):99-114. doi: 10.1080/0265203021000042896.
4
Intake of intense sweeteners in Germany.德国高强度甜味剂的摄入量。
Z Ernahrungswiss. 1992 Mar;31(1):25-39. doi: 10.1007/BF01612550.
5
Intake of low and no-calorie sweeteners (LNCS) by the Brazilian population.巴西人口对低热量和无热量甜味剂的摄入量。
Food Addit Contam Part A Chem Anal Control Expo Risk Assess. 2021 Feb;38(2):181-194. doi: 10.1080/19440049.2020.1846083. Epub 2020 Dec 18.
6
Dietary intake of four artificial sweeteners by Irish pre-school children.爱尔兰学龄前儿童对四种人工甜味剂的膳食摄入量。
Food Addit Contam Part A Chem Anal Control Expo Risk Assess. 2016;33(4):592-602. doi: 10.1080/19440049.2016.1152880. Epub 2016 Mar 4.
7
Dietary intakes of six intense sweeteners by Irish adults.爱尔兰成年人对六种高强度甜味剂的膳食摄入量。
Food Addit Contam Part A Chem Anal Control Expo Risk Assess. 2018 Mar;35(3):425-438. doi: 10.1080/19440049.2017.1411619. Epub 2017 Dec 28.
8
Position of the American Dietetic Association: use of nutritive and nonnutritive sweeteners.美国饮食协会的立场:营养性和非营养性甜味剂的使用
J Am Diet Assoc. 2004 Feb;104(2):255-75. doi: 10.1016/j.jada.2003.12.001.
9
Position of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics: use of nutritive and nonnutritive sweeteners.美国营养与饮食学会立场声明:营养性和非营养性甜味剂的使用
J Acad Nutr Diet. 2012 May;112(5):739-58. doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2012.03.009. Epub 2012 Apr 25.
10
Estimated intake of intense sweeteners from non-alcoholic beverages in Denmark.丹麦非酒精饮料中人工合成甜味剂的估计摄入量。
Food Addit Contam. 2007 Mar;24(3):227-35. doi: 10.1080/02652030601019429.

引用本文的文献

1
Re-evaluation of neotame (E 961) as food additive.对纽甜(E 961)作为食品添加剂的重新评估。
EFSA J. 2025 Jul 4;23(7):e9480. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2025.9480. eCollection 2025 Jul.
2
Re-evaluation of acesulfame K (E 950) as food additive.重新评估乙酰磺胺酸钾(E 950)作为食品添加剂的安全性。
EFSA J. 2025 Apr 30;23(4):e9317. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2025.9317. eCollection 2025 Apr.
3
Risk of Exposure to Steviol Glycosides Through Consumption of Foods and Beverages: A Survey of the Thai Population.通过食用食品和饮料接触甜菊糖苷的风险:泰国人群调查
Food Sci Nutr. 2025 Jan 9;13(2):e4681. doi: 10.1002/fsn3.4681. eCollection 2025 Feb.
4
Tiered dietary exposure assessment of steviol glycosides in the Belgian population.比利时人群中甜菊糖苷的分层饮食暴露评估。
J Nutr Sci. 2023 Feb 21;12:e28. doi: 10.1017/jns.2023.13. eCollection 2023.
5
Re-evaluation of neohesperidine dihydrochalcone (E 959) as a food additive.新橙皮苷二氢查耳酮(E 959)作为食品添加剂的重新评估。
EFSA J. 2022 Nov 17;20(11):e07595. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2022.7595. eCollection 2022 Nov.
6
The Sharp Rise in the Use of Low- and No-Calorie Sweeteners in Non-Alcoholic Beverages in Slovenia: An Update Based on 2020 Data.斯洛文尼亚非酒精饮料中低热量和无热量甜味剂使用量的急剧上升:基于2020年数据的更新
Front Nutr. 2021 Nov 19;8:778178. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2021.778178. eCollection 2021.
7
Use of acceptable daily intake (ADI) as a health-based benchmark in nutrition research studies that consider the safety of low-calorie sweeteners (LCS): a systematic map.使用可接受日摄入量(ADI)作为营养研究中考虑低卡路里甜味剂(LCS)安全性的基于健康的基准:系统图谱。
BMC Public Health. 2021 May 20;21(1):956. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-10934-2.
8
Trends in the Use of Low and No-Calorie Sweeteners in Non-Alcoholic Beverages in Slovenia.斯洛文尼亚非酒精饮料中低热量和无热量甜味剂的使用趋势
Foods. 2021 Feb 10;10(2):387. doi: 10.3390/foods10020387.
9
Low-/No-Calorie Sweeteners: A Review of Global Intakes.低/无热量甜味剂:全球摄入量综述。
Nutrients. 2018 Mar 15;10(3):357. doi: 10.3390/nu10030357.