Huxley Caroline, Sturt Jackie, Dale Jeremy, Walker Rosie, Caramlau Isabela, O'Hare Joseph P, Griffiths Frances
Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.
Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing and Midwifery, King's College London, London, UK.
BMJ Open. 2015 Nov 2;5(11):e008781. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008781.
To predict the diabetes-related outcomes of people undertaking a type 2 Diabetes Self-Management Education (DSME) programme from their baseline data.
A mixed-methods longitudinal experimental study. 6 practice nurses and 2 clinical academics undertook blind assessments of all baseline and process data to predict clinical, behavioural and psychological outcomes at 6 months post-DSME programme.
Primary care.
-31 people with type 2 diabetes who had not previously undertaken DSME.
All participants undertook the Diabetes Manual 1:1 self-directed learning 12-week DSME programme supported by practice nurses trained as Diabetes Manual facilitators.
Glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c), diabetes knowledge, physical activity, waist circumference, self-efficacy, diabetes distress, anxiety, depression, demographics, change talk and treatment satisfaction. These variables were chosen because they are known to influence self-management behaviour or to have been influenced by a DSME programme in empirical evidence.
Baseline and 6-month follow-up data were available for 27 participants of which 13 (48%) were male, 22 (82%) white British, mean age 59 years and mean duration of type 2 diabetes 9.1 years. Significant reductions were found in HbA1c t(26)=2.35, p=0.03, and diabetes distress t(26)=2.30, p=0.03, and a significant increase in knowledge t(26)=-2.06, p=0.05 between baseline and 6 months. No significant changes were found in waist circumference, physical activity, anxiety, depression or self-efficacy. Accuracy of predictions varied little between clinical academics and practice nurses but greatly between outcome (0-100%). The median and mode accuracy of predicted outcome was 66.67%. Accuracy of prediction for the key outcome of HbA1c was 44.44%. Diabetes distress had the highest prediction accuracy (81.48%).
Clinicians in this small study were unable to identify individuals likely to achieve improvement in outcomes from DSME. DSME should be promoted to all patients with diabetes according to guidelines.
根据基线数据预测参加2型糖尿病自我管理教育(DSME)项目的人群与糖尿病相关的结局。
一项混合方法的纵向实验研究。6名执业护士和2名临床学者对所有基线和过程数据进行了盲法评估,以预测DSME项目结束后6个月的临床、行为和心理结局。
初级保健。
31名既往未参加过DSME的2型糖尿病患者。
所有参与者在接受培训成为《糖尿病手册》促进者的执业护士的支持下,参加了为期12周的《糖尿病手册》1:1自主学习DSME项目。
糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)、糖尿病知识、身体活动、腰围、自我效能感、糖尿病困扰、焦虑、抑郁、人口统计学特征、改变谈话和治疗满意度。选择这些变量是因为已知它们会影响自我管理行为或在实证研究中受到DSME项目的影响。
27名参与者有基线和6个月随访数据,其中13名(48%)为男性,22名(82%)为英国白人,平均年龄59岁,2型糖尿病平均病程9.1年。在基线和6个月之间,HbA1c(t(26)=2.35,p=0.03)和糖尿病困扰(t(26)=2.30,p=0.03)显著降低,知识(t(26)=-2.06,p=0.05)显著增加。腰围、身体活动、焦虑、抑郁或自我效能感无显著变化。临床学者和执业护士之间的预测准确性差异不大,但不同结局之间差异很大(0-100%)。预测结局的中位数和众数准确性为66.67%。HbA1c关键结局的预测准确性为44.44%。糖尿病困扰的预测准确性最高(81.48%)。
在这项小型研究中,临床医生无法识别可能从DSME中实现结局改善的个体。应根据指南向所有糖尿病患者推广DSME。