Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Froedtert & The Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin (Ms Dawson, Dr Walker, Dr Egede).
Center for Patient Care and Outcomes Research, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin (Ms Dawson, Dr Walker, Dr Egede).
Diabetes Educ. 2017 Aug;43(4):360-366. doi: 10.1177/0145721717713316. Epub 2017 Jun 9.
Background Diabetes affects more than 29 million people in the US and requires daily self-management in addition to knowledge of the disease. Three knowledge assessments used are the Michigan Brief Diabetes Knowledge Test (DKT), Starr County Diabetes Knowledge Questionnaire (DKQ), and Kaiser DISTANCE Survey (DISTANCE). Purpose The purpose of the study was to test the discriminate validity of 3 diabetes knowledge scales and determine which is best associated with diabetes self-care and glycemic control. Methods Three hundred sixty-one adults with type 2 diabetes were recruited from primary care clinics. Four analyses were conducted to investigate the validity and relationships of the scale: alpha statistic to test internal validity, factor analysis to determine how much of the variance was explained, Pearson's correlation between the 3 scales, and Pearson's correlation between each scale, self-care, and outcomes. Results The DKQ had an alpha of 0.75, the DKT had an alpha of 0.49, and DISTANCE had an alpha of 0.36. The DKQ was significantly correlated with glycemic control. The DKT scale was significantly associated with general diet, the DISTANCE survey was significantly associated with exercise, and both DKT and DISTANCE were significantly associated with foot care. Conclusion Correlations among the 3 scales were modest, suggesting the scales are not measuring the same underlying construct. These findings indicate that researchers should carefully select scales appropriate for study goals or to appropriately capture the information being sought to inform practice.
在美国,有超过 2900 万人患有糖尿病,除了对疾病的了解外,还需要日常的自我管理。目前使用的三种知识评估方法是密歇根简明糖尿病知识测试(DKT)、斯塔尔县糖尿病知识问卷(DKQ)和凯撒距离调查(DISTANCE)。目的:本研究旨在测试三种糖尿病知识量表的区分效度,并确定哪种量表与糖尿病自我护理和血糖控制的相关性最好。方法:从初级保健诊所招募了 361 名 2 型糖尿病成人。进行了四项分析来研究量表的有效性和关系:alpha 统计检验内部有效性,因子分析确定方差的解释程度,三个量表之间的 Pearson 相关,以及每个量表、自我护理和结果之间的 Pearson 相关。结果:DKQ 的 alpha 值为 0.75,DKT 的 alpha 值为 0.49,DISTANCE 的 alpha 值为 0.36。DKQ 与血糖控制显著相关。DKT 量表与一般饮食显著相关,DISTANCE 调查与运动显著相关,DKT 和 DISTANCE 量表均与足部护理显著相关。结论:三个量表之间的相关性中等,表明这些量表没有测量相同的潜在结构。这些发现表明,研究人员应根据研究目标仔细选择适当的量表,或适当地获取所寻求的信息,以指导实践。