Suppr超能文献

糖尿病知识量表与糖尿病结局的差异关系。

Differential Relationships Between Diabetes Knowledge Scales and Diabetes Outcomes.

机构信息

Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Froedtert & The Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin (Ms Dawson, Dr Walker, Dr Egede).

Center for Patient Care and Outcomes Research, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin (Ms Dawson, Dr Walker, Dr Egede).

出版信息

Diabetes Educ. 2017 Aug;43(4):360-366. doi: 10.1177/0145721717713316. Epub 2017 Jun 9.

Abstract

Background Diabetes affects more than 29 million people in the US and requires daily self-management in addition to knowledge of the disease. Three knowledge assessments used are the Michigan Brief Diabetes Knowledge Test (DKT), Starr County Diabetes Knowledge Questionnaire (DKQ), and Kaiser DISTANCE Survey (DISTANCE). Purpose The purpose of the study was to test the discriminate validity of 3 diabetes knowledge scales and determine which is best associated with diabetes self-care and glycemic control. Methods Three hundred sixty-one adults with type 2 diabetes were recruited from primary care clinics. Four analyses were conducted to investigate the validity and relationships of the scale: alpha statistic to test internal validity, factor analysis to determine how much of the variance was explained, Pearson's correlation between the 3 scales, and Pearson's correlation between each scale, self-care, and outcomes. Results The DKQ had an alpha of 0.75, the DKT had an alpha of 0.49, and DISTANCE had an alpha of 0.36. The DKQ was significantly correlated with glycemic control. The DKT scale was significantly associated with general diet, the DISTANCE survey was significantly associated with exercise, and both DKT and DISTANCE were significantly associated with foot care. Conclusion Correlations among the 3 scales were modest, suggesting the scales are not measuring the same underlying construct. These findings indicate that researchers should carefully select scales appropriate for study goals or to appropriately capture the information being sought to inform practice.

摘要

背景

在美国,有超过 2900 万人患有糖尿病,除了对疾病的了解外,还需要日常的自我管理。目前使用的三种知识评估方法是密歇根简明糖尿病知识测试(DKT)、斯塔尔县糖尿病知识问卷(DKQ)和凯撒距离调查(DISTANCE)。目的:本研究旨在测试三种糖尿病知识量表的区分效度,并确定哪种量表与糖尿病自我护理和血糖控制的相关性最好。方法:从初级保健诊所招募了 361 名 2 型糖尿病成人。进行了四项分析来研究量表的有效性和关系:alpha 统计检验内部有效性,因子分析确定方差的解释程度,三个量表之间的 Pearson 相关,以及每个量表、自我护理和结果之间的 Pearson 相关。结果:DKQ 的 alpha 值为 0.75,DKT 的 alpha 值为 0.49,DISTANCE 的 alpha 值为 0.36。DKQ 与血糖控制显著相关。DKT 量表与一般饮食显著相关,DISTANCE 调查与运动显著相关,DKT 和 DISTANCE 量表均与足部护理显著相关。结论:三个量表之间的相关性中等,表明这些量表没有测量相同的潜在结构。这些发现表明,研究人员应根据研究目标仔细选择适当的量表,或适当地获取所寻求的信息,以指导实践。

相似文献

1
Differential Relationships Between Diabetes Knowledge Scales and Diabetes Outcomes.
Diabetes Educ. 2017 Aug;43(4):360-366. doi: 10.1177/0145721717713316. Epub 2017 Jun 9.
2
Validity and Reliability of a (Brief) Diabetes "Survival Skills" Knowledge Test: KNOW Diabetes.
Diabetes Educ. 2019 Apr;45(2):184-193. doi: 10.1177/0145721719828064. Epub 2019 Feb 25.
4
Psychometric properties of the Diabetes Self-Management Questionnaire (DSMQ) in Urdu.
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2017 Oct 12;15(1):200. doi: 10.1186/s12955-017-0776-8.
5
Cross-cultural adaptation of the Diabetes Management Self-Efficacy Scale for patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: scale development.
Int J Nurs Stud. 2006 Jul;43(5):611-21. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2005.07.008. Epub 2005 Oct 18.
6
Development and initial validation of primary care provider mental illness management and team-based care self-efficacy scales.
Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2017 Mar-Apr;45:44-50. doi: 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2016.12.005. Epub 2016 Dec 22.
7
A new comprehensive diabetes health literacy scale: Development and psychometric evaluation.
Int J Nurs Stud. 2018 Dec;88:1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2018.08.002. Epub 2018 Aug 10.
8
[Evaluation on the validity and reliability of the Diabetes Self-management Knowledge, Attitude, and Behavior Assessment Scale (DSKAB)].
Zhonghua Yu Fang Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2016 Jan;50(1):56-60. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-9624.2016.01.010.
10
Development of a New Measure for Assessing Glucose Monitoring Device-Related Treatment Satisfaction and Quality of Life.
Diabetes Technol Ther. 2015 Sep;17(9):657-63. doi: 10.1089/dia.2014.0417. Epub 2015 Apr 29.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

1
Making sense of Cronbach's alpha.
Int J Med Educ. 2011 Jun 27;2:53-55. doi: 10.5116/ijme.4dfb.8dfd.
2
Intervention strategies that support self-care activities: an integrative study across disease/impairment groupings.
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2010;8(33):1304-1350. doi: 10.11124/01938924-201008330-00001.
3
Design, developing and validation a questionnaire to assess general population awareness about type II diabetes disease and its complications.
Diabetes Metab Syndr. 2017 Nov;11 Suppl 1:S39-S43. doi: 10.1016/j.dsx.2016.09.002. Epub 2016 Sep 5.
6
Diabetes education program for people with type 2 diabetes: An international perspective.
Eval Program Plann. 2016 Jun;56:64-8. doi: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2016.02.002. Epub 2016 Mar 21.
8
Diabetes self-management education for adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus: A systematic review of the effect on glycemic control.
Patient Educ Couns. 2016 Jun;99(6):926-43. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2015.11.003. Epub 2015 Nov 22.
10
Pharmacist-provided diabetes management and education via a telemonitoring program.
J Am Pharm Assoc (2003). 2015 Sep-Oct;55(5):516-26. doi: 10.1331/JAPhA.2015.14285.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验