Fujiwara Kazunori, Fukuhara Takahiro, Niimi Koji, Sato Takahiro, Kataoka Hideyuki, Kitano Hiroya, Takeuchi Hiromi
Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery Faculty of Medicine Tottori University, 36-1, Nishimachi, Yonago, 683-8504, Japan.
Mechanical and Material Research Facility, Mechanical Engineering Division, Tottori Institute of Industrial Technology, Yonago, Japan.
J Robot Surg. 2015 Dec;9(4):347-54. doi: 10.1007/s11701-015-0539-7. Epub 2015 Nov 4.
Transoral robotic surgery (TORS), performed with the da Vinci surgical system (da Vinci), has been classified as a surgical approach for benign and malignant lesions of the oral cavity and laryngopharynx. It provides several unique advantages, which include a three-dimensional magnified view, ability to see and work around curves or angles, and the availability of two or three robotic arms. At present, however, the da Vinci surgical system does not provide haptic feedback. The potential risks specific to the transoral use of the da Vinci include tooth injury, mucosal laceration, ocular injury, and mandibular fracture. To prevent such intra-operative tooth injuries, we created a mouthpiece made of polyethylene terephthalate glycol (PETG) individually shaped for the patient's teeth. We compared the safety and efficacy of the PETG mouthpiece with those of a conventional mouthpiece made of ethylene-vinyl acetate (EVA). To determine the difference in tooth injury resulting from the two types of mouthpiece, we constructed an experimental system to measure load and strain. We measured the dynamic load and the strain from the rod to the tooth using the PETG and EVA mouthpiece. The rod was pressed against the tooth model outfitted with two types of mouthpiece and the dynamic load was measured with a load cell and the strain with a strain gage. The maximum dynamic load was 1.29 ± 0.03 kgf for the PETG mouthpiece and 2.24 ± 0.05 kgf for the EVA mouthpiece. The load against the tooth was thus less for the EVA mouthpiece. The strain was -166.84 ± 3.94 and 48.24 ± 7.77 με, respectively, while the load direction was parallel to that of the tooth axis for the PETG mouthpiece and perpendicular to the tooth axis for the EVA mouthpiece. The PETG mouthpiece reduced the tooth load compared with the EVA mouthpiece and the load direction was in parallel to the tooth axis. The PETG mouthpiece thus enhances tooth safety for TORS.
经口机器人手术(TORS),通过达芬奇手术系统(da Vinci)进行,已被归类为口腔和喉咽良性及恶性病变的一种手术方法。它具有几个独特的优势,包括三维放大视野、能够在曲线或角度周围进行观察和操作,以及有两个或三个机器人手臂可供使用。然而,目前达芬奇手术系统不提供触觉反馈。经口使用达芬奇手术系统特有的潜在风险包括牙齿损伤、黏膜撕裂、眼部损伤和下颌骨折。为防止术中牙齿损伤,我们制作了一种由聚对苯二甲酸乙二醇酯二醇(PETG)制成的口器,其形状根据患者牙齿单独定制。我们将PETG口器的安全性和有效性与由乙烯 - 醋酸乙烯酯(EVA)制成的传统口器进行了比较。为确定两种口器导致牙齿损伤的差异,我们构建了一个测量负荷和应变的实验系统。我们使用PETG和EVA口器测量了从杆到牙齿的动态负荷和应变。将杆压在配备有两种口器的牙齿模型上,用测力计测量动态负荷,用应变计测量应变。PETG口器的最大动态负荷为1.29±0.03千克力,EVA口器为2.24±0.05千克力。因此,EVA口器对牙齿的负荷较小。应变分别为 -166.84±3.94和48.24±7.77微应变,同时PETG口器的负荷方向与牙齿轴线平行,EVA口器的负荷方向与牙齿轴线垂直。与EVA口器相比,PETG口器降低了牙齿负荷,且负荷方向与牙齿轴线平行。因此PETG口器提高了TORS的牙齿安全性。