• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Cefotaxime and desacetylcefotaxime in neonates and children: a review of microbiologic, pharmacokinetic, and clinical experience.

作者信息

Jacobs R F, Kearns G L

机构信息

Department of Pediatrics, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock.

出版信息

Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 1989 Jan-Feb;12(1):93-9. doi: 10.1016/0732-8893(89)90052-7.

DOI:10.1016/0732-8893(89)90052-7
PMID:2653717
Abstract

Over the past 5 yr, we have conducted two clinical and two pharmacokinetic investigations of cefotaxime (CTX) and desacetylcefotaxime (dCTX) in neonates, infants, and children. A total of 50 children with culture-proven bacterial meningitis were randomized to receive either 200 mg/kg/day of CTX (n = 23, mean age 24.4 mo) or standard doses of ampicillin (AMP) and chloramphenicol succinate (CAPS; n = 27, mean age 16.6 mo). Results were similar between the CTX and Amp/CAPS groups for clinical/microbiological cures (100% versus 96%, respectively) and for survival without sequelae (78% vs. 77%, respectively). All bacterial isolates were sensitive to CTX, and the comparison of the MIC/MBC values for CTX to the CSF bactericidal titers suggested antimicrobial activity for dCTX. In a second clinical trial, 20 infants (1 wk-3 mo) were treated with 200 mg/kg/day of CTX for Gram-negative enteric bacillary meningitis. Cultures of CSF obtained 24 hr after the initiation of treatment were sterile in all subjects. Survival and complication rates of 95% and 21%, respectively, were observed. This compared favorably to previously published experiences with alternate treatment regimens for Gram-negative meningitis in the newborn. In both meningitis studies, the safety profile for CTX was excellent.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

摘要

相似文献

1
Cefotaxime and desacetylcefotaxime in neonates and children: a review of microbiologic, pharmacokinetic, and clinical experience.
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 1989 Jan-Feb;12(1):93-9. doi: 10.1016/0732-8893(89)90052-7.
2
Cefotaxime pharmacokinetics and treatment of meningitis in neonates.头孢噻肟在新生儿中的药代动力学及脑膜炎治疗
Infection. 1989 Sep-Oct;17(5):338-42. doi: 10.1007/BF01650725.
3
[MICs and MBCs of cefotaxime, desacetylcefotaxime and ceftriaxone against four principal bacteria causing meningitis].
Jpn J Antibiot. 1984 Sep;37(9):1701-13.
4
Prospective comparative trial of ceftriaxone vs. conventional therapy for treatment of bacterial meningitis in children.头孢曲松与传统疗法治疗儿童细菌性脑膜炎的前瞻性对照试验
Pediatr Infect Dis. 1985 Jul-Aug;4(4):362-8. doi: 10.1097/00006454-198507000-00006.
5
A prospective randomized comparison of cefotaxime vs ampicillin and chloramphenicol for bacterial meningitis in children.
J Pediatr. 1985 Jul;107(1):129-33. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3476(85)80634-x.
6
Cefotaxime and desacetylcefotaxime pharmacokinetics in infants and children with meningitis.头孢噻肟和去乙酰头孢噻肟在患脑膜炎婴幼儿及儿童中的药代动力学
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1985 Dec;28(6):791-5. doi: 10.1128/AAC.28.6.791.
7
Comparison of the efficacy and safety of ceftriaxone to ampicillin/chloramphenicol in the treatment of childhood meningitis.头孢曲松与氨苄西林/氯霉素治疗儿童脑膜炎的疗效和安全性比较。
J Antimicrob Chemother. 1984 Feb;13(2):143-51. doi: 10.1093/jac/13.2.143.
8
Activity of cefotaxime/desacetylcefotaxime with two aminoglycosides against gram-negative pathogens: an example of interactive synergy.
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 1989 Jan-Feb;12(1):51-5. doi: 10.1016/0732-8893(89)90046-1.
9
Cefotaxime vs. conventional therapy for the treatment of bacterial meningitis of infants and children.头孢噻肟与传统疗法治疗婴幼儿细菌性脑膜炎的对比
Pediatr Infect Dis. 1986 Jul-Aug;5(4):402-7. doi: 10.1097/00006454-198607000-00005.
10
Ceftriaxone versus ampicillin and chloramphenicol for treatment of bacterial meningitis in children.头孢曲松与氨苄西林及氯霉素治疗儿童细菌性脑膜炎的疗效比较
Lancet. 1983 Jun 4;1(8336):1241-4. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(83)92696-x.

引用本文的文献

1
Exploration of adverse event profiles for cefotaxime: a disproportionality analysis using the FDA adverse event reporting system.头孢噻肟不良事件特征探索:使用美国食品药品监督管理局不良事件报告系统的不成比例分析
BMC Pharmacol Toxicol. 2025 Jul 1;26(1):129. doi: 10.1186/s40360-025-00960-w.
2
A Population and Developmental Pharmacokinetic Analysis To Evaluate and Optimize Cefotaxime Dosing Regimen in Neonates and Young Infants.一项评估和优化新生儿及小婴儿头孢噻肟给药方案的群体和发育药代动力学分析。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2016 Oct 21;60(11):6626-6634. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01045-16. Print 2016 Nov.
3
Pharmacokinetics of anti-infective agents in paediatric patients.
抗感染药物在儿科患者中的药代动力学。
Clin Pharmacokinet. 1994 May;26(5):374-95. doi: 10.2165/00003088-199426050-00005.
4
The antimicrobial activity of cefotaxime: comparative multinational hospital isolate surveys covering 15 years.头孢噻肟的抗菌活性:涵盖15年的多国医院分离株比较调查
Infection. 1994;22 Suppl 3:S152-60. doi: 10.1007/BF01782700.
5
Cefotaxime pharmacokinetics and treatment of meningitis in neonates.头孢噻肟在新生儿中的药代动力学及脑膜炎治疗
Infection. 1989 Sep-Oct;17(5):338-42. doi: 10.1007/BF01650725.
6
Clinical pharmacokinetics of antibacterial drugs in neonates.抗菌药物在新生儿中的临床药代动力学。
Clin Pharmacokinet. 1990 Oct;19(4):280-318. doi: 10.2165/00003088-199019040-00003.
7
Cefotaxime. An update of its pharmacology and therapeutic use.头孢噻肟。其药理学与治疗应用的最新进展。
Drugs. 1990 Oct;40(4):608-51. doi: 10.2165/00003495-199040040-00008.
8
Cefotaxime dosage in infants and children. Pharmacokinetic and clinical rationale for an extended dosage interval.
Clin Pharmacokinet. 1992 Apr;22(4):284-97. doi: 10.2165/00003088-199222040-00004.