Hartwigsen Gesa, Bergmann Til Ole, Herz Damian Marc, Angstmann Steffen, Karabanov Anke, Raffin Estelle, Thielscher Axel, Siebner Hartwig Roman
Department of Psychology, Christian-Albrechts-University, Kiel, Germany.
Department of Psychology, Christian-Albrechts-University, Kiel, Germany.
Prog Brain Res. 2015;222:261-87. doi: 10.1016/bs.pbr.2015.06.014. Epub 2015 Jul 29.
Noninvasive transcranial brain stimulation (NTBS) is widely used to elucidate the contribution of different brain regions to various cognitive functions. Here we present three modeling approaches that are informed by functional or structural brain mapping or behavior profiling and discuss how these approaches advance the scientific potential of NTBS as an interventional tool in cognitive neuroscience. (i) Leveraging the anatomical information provided by structural imaging, the electric field distribution in the brain can be modeled and simulated. Biophysical modeling approaches generate testable predictions regarding the impact of interindividual variations in cortical anatomy on the injected electric fields or the influence of the orientation of current flow on the physiological stimulation effects. (ii) Functional brain mapping of the spatiotemporal neural dynamics during cognitive tasks can be used to construct causal network models. These models can identify spatiotemporal changes in effective connectivity during distinct cognitive states and allow for examining how effective connectivity is shaped by NTBS. (iii) Modeling the NTBS effects based on neuroimaging can be complemented by behavior-based cognitive models that exploit variations in task performance. For instance, NTBS-induced changes in response speed and accuracy can be explicitly modeled in a cognitive framework accounting for the speed-accuracy trade-off. This enables to dissociate between behavioral NTBS effects that emerge in the context of rapid automatic responses or in the context of slow deliberate responses. We argue that these complementary modeling approaches facilitate the use of NTBS as a means of dissecting the causal architecture of cognitive systems of the human brain.
无创经颅脑刺激(NTBS)被广泛用于阐明不同脑区对各种认知功能的贡献。在此,我们介绍三种基于功能或结构脑图谱或行为剖析的建模方法,并讨论这些方法如何提升NTBS作为认知神经科学干预工具的科学潜力。(i)利用结构成像提供的解剖学信息,可以对大脑中的电场分布进行建模和模拟。生物物理建模方法针对个体间皮质解剖结构差异对注入电场的影响或电流方向对生理刺激效果的影响生成可测试的预测。(ii)认知任务期间时空神经动力学的功能脑图谱可用于构建因果网络模型。这些模型可以识别不同认知状态下有效连接性的时空变化,并允许研究NTBS如何塑造有效连接性。(iii)基于神经成像对NTBS效应进行建模,可以通过利用任务表现差异的基于行为的认知模型进行补充。例如,NTBS引起的反应速度和准确性变化可以在考虑速度-准确性权衡的认知框架中进行明确建模。这使得能够区分在快速自动反应或缓慢深思熟虑反应背景下出现的行为NTBS效应。我们认为,这些互补的建模方法有助于将NTBS用作剖析人类大脑认知系统因果结构的手段。