在一项2期癌症治疗试验期间,与临床研究人员共享患者报告的症状毒性和体能状态的可行性及临床影响。

Feasibility and clinical impact of sharing patient-reported symptom toxicities and performance status with clinical investigators during a phase 2 cancer treatment trial.

作者信息

Basch Ethan, Wood William A, Schrag Deborah, Sima Camelia S, Shaw Mary, Rogak Lauren J, Kris Mark G, Shouery Marwan, Bennett Antonia, Atkinson Thomas, Pietanza M Catherine

机构信息

Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA Cancer Outcomes Research Program, Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA

Cancer Outcomes Research Program, Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.

出版信息

Clin Trials. 2016 Jun;13(3):331-7. doi: 10.1177/1740774515615540. Epub 2015 Nov 4.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Clinicians can miss up to half of patients' symptomatic toxicities in cancer clinical trials and routine practice. Although patient-reported outcome questionnaires have been developed to capture this information, it is unclear whether clinicians will make use of patient-reported outcomes to inform their own toxicity documentation, or to prompt symptom management activities.

METHODS

44 lung cancer patients that participated in a phase 2 treatment trial self-reported 13 symptomatic toxicities derived from the National Cancer Institute's Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events and Karnofsky Performance Status via tablet computers in waiting areas immediately preceding scheduled visits. During visits, clinicians viewed patients' self-reported toxicity and performance status ratings on a computer interface and could agree or disagree/reassign grades ("shared" reporting). Agreement of clinicians with patient-reported grades was tabulated, and compared using weighted kappa statistics. Clinical actions in response to patient-reported severe (grade 3/4) toxicities were measured (e.g. treatment discontinuation, dose reduction, supportive medications). For comparison, 45 non-trial patients with lung cancer being treated in the same clinic by the same physicians were simultaneously enrolled in a parallel cohort study in which patients also self-reported toxicity grades but reports were not shared with clinicians ("non-shared" reporting).

RESULTS

Toxicities and performance status were reported by patients and reviewed by clinicians at (780/782) 99.7% of study visits in the phase 2 trial which used "shared" reporting. Clinicians agreed with patients 93% of the time with kappas 0.82-0.92. Clinical actions were taken in response to 67% of severe patient-reported toxicities. In the "non-shared" reporting comparison group, clinicians agreed with patients 56% of the time with kappas 0.04-0.48 (significantly worse than shared reporting for all symptoms), and clinical actions were taken in response to 44% of severe patient-reported toxicities.

CONCLUSION

Clinicians will frequently agree with patient-reported symptoms and performance status, and will use this information to guide documentation and symptom management. (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT00807573).

摘要

背景

在癌症临床试验和常规医疗实践中,临床医生可能会遗漏高达一半的患者症状性毒性反应。尽管已经开发了患者报告结局问卷来获取此类信息,但尚不清楚临床医生是否会利用患者报告的结局来完善自身的毒性记录,或促使其开展症状管理活动。

方法

44名参与2期治疗试验的肺癌患者在预定就诊前,于候诊区通过平板电脑自行报告了源自美国国立癌症研究所不良事件通用术语标准和卡氏功能状态量表的13种症状性毒性反应。就诊期间,临床医生在电脑界面上查看患者自行报告的毒性反应和功能状态评分,并可同意或不同意/重新评定等级(“共享”报告)。将临床医生与患者报告等级的一致性制成表格,并使用加权kappa统计量进行比较。记录针对患者报告的严重(3/4级)毒性反应采取的临床措施(如治疗中断、剂量减少、支持性用药)。作为对照,45名在同一诊所由相同医生治疗的非试验肺癌患者同时纳入一项平行队列研究,患者同样自行报告毒性反应等级,但报告不与临床医生共享(“非共享”报告)。

结果

在采用“共享”报告的2期试验中,(780/782)99.7%的研究就诊中患者报告了毒性反应和功能状态,临床医生进行了查看。临床医生93%的情况下与患者意见一致,kappa值为0.82 - 0.92。针对67%的患者报告的严重毒性反应采取了临床措施。在“非共享”报告对照组中,临床医生56%的情况下与患者意见一致,kappa值为0.04 - 0.48(对于所有症状均显著差于共享报告),针对44%的患者报告的严重毒性反应采取了临床措施。

结论

临床医生通常会与患者报告的症状和功能状态意见一致,并会利用这些信息来指导记录和症状管理。(ClinicalTrials.gov:NCT00807573)

相似文献

引用本文的文献

[3]
Mobility Assessment Instruments.

Semin Oncol Nurs. 2024-8

本文引用的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索