van Steenberghe D
Department of Periodontology, Catholic University Leuven, Faculty of Medicine, Belgium.
J Prosthet Dent. 1989 Feb;61(2):217-23. doi: 10.1016/0022-3913(89)90378-8.
Whether the excellent prognosis of the osseointegration technique also applies for the rehabilitation of partially edentulous jaws was investigated through a multicenter retrospective study. Six centers from three continents participated in the study, which included 133 fixtures in 38 patients. Forty fixtures were installed in the upper jaw and 93 in the lower jaw. The observation time varied between 6 and 36 months after prosthetic reconstruction. Clinical evaluation included mobility measurement of the restorations and control of infectious or neurologic complication. Radiologically the absence of radiolucency around the fixtures was checked by a single observer who also calculated the distance between the marginal bone and the top of the fixture. Fifty-eight percent of the prostheses were connected to natural teeth. The success rate for the individual fixtures in the upper and lower jaws was 87% and 92%, respectively. The most failures occurred before the prosthetic rehabilitation. The mean maximum distance between the margin of the bone and the fixture-abutment junction was 2.5 mm. Since only two of the 53 fixed prostheses were lost during the observation period, and since most fixture losses occurred before the prosthetic phase of the treatment, this study supports the concept that osseointegrated prostheses can also be applied to the rehabilitation of partial edentulism.
通过一项多中心回顾性研究,调查了骨结合技术的良好预后是否也适用于部分无牙颌的修复。来自三大洲的六个中心参与了该研究,共纳入38例患者的133枚种植体。上颌植入40枚种植体,下颌植入93枚。修复重建后观察时间为6至36个月。临床评估包括修复体的松动度测量以及感染或神经并发症的控制。由一名观察者通过影像学检查种植体周围是否存在透射影,并计算边缘骨与种植体顶部之间的距离。58%的修复体与天然牙相连。上颌和下颌单个种植体的成功率分别为87%和92%。大多数失败发生在修复前。骨边缘与种植体-基台连接处之间的平均最大距离为2.5毫米。由于在观察期内53枚固定修复体中仅丢失了2枚,且大多数种植体丢失发生在治疗的修复阶段之前,因此本研究支持骨结合修复体也可应用于部分牙列缺失修复的观点。