Fukuda Masayuki, Matsunaga Satoru, Odaka Kento, Oomine Yuuya, Kasahara Masaaki, Yamamoto Masahito, Abe Shinichi
Department of Anatomy, Tokyo Dental College, 2-9-18, Misaki-cho, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo, 101-0061, Japan.
Int J Implant Dent. 2015 Dec;1(1):12. doi: 10.1186/s40729-015-0012-4. Epub 2015 May 1.
The purpose of this study was to reveal the structural properties that need to be considered in dental implant treatment by investigating differences between dentulous and edentulous maxillae in the three-dimensional (3D) microstructure of the incisive canals (ICs) and their surrounding bone.
A total of 40 maxillary bones comprising 20 dentulous maxillae and 20 edentulous maxillae were imaged by micro-CT for 3D observation and measurement of the IC and alveolar bone in the anterior region of the IC.
The Y-morphology canal was most frequently observed at 60% in dentulous maxilla and 55% in edentulous maxilla. There was a significant difference between dentulous and edentulous maxillae in IC diameter and volume, but no significant difference between the two in the major axis of the ICs.
The anatomic structure surrounding the IC has limited area for implant placement. Therefore, where esthetic and long-term maintenance requirements are taken into account, careful attention is needed when setting the placement position. Also, due to the resorption of bone, edentulous maxillae have a different IC morphology from dentulous maxillae, and therefore, a cautious approach is required.
本研究的目的是通过研究有牙颌和无牙颌上颌切牙管(ICs)及其周围骨的三维(3D)微观结构差异,揭示牙种植治疗中需要考虑的结构特性。
对总共40块上颌骨进行微计算机断层扫描成像,其中包括20块有牙颌上颌骨和20块无牙颌上颌骨,以对IC及其前部区域的牙槽骨进行3D观察和测量。
Y形管在有牙颌上颌骨中的观察频率最高,为60%,在无牙颌上颌骨中为55%。有牙颌和无牙颌上颌骨在IC直径和体积上存在显著差异,但在IC的长轴上两者无显著差异。
IC周围的解剖结构限制了种植体的植入区域。因此,在考虑美学和长期维护要求时,设置植入位置时需要格外小心。此外,由于骨吸收,无牙颌上颌骨的IC形态与有牙颌上颌骨不同,因此需要谨慎对待。