Ryu Young Jin, Choi Young Hun, Cheon Jung-Eun, Ha Seongmin, Kim Woo Sun, Kim In-One
Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital, 101 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul, 110-744, Korea.
Department of Radiology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Pediatr Radiol. 2016 Mar;46(3):303-15. doi: 10.1007/s00247-015-3486-6. Epub 2015 Nov 6.
CT of pediatric phantoms can provide useful guidance to the optimization of knowledge-based iterative reconstruction CT.
To compare radiation dose and image quality of CT images obtained at different radiation doses reconstructed with knowledge-based iterative reconstruction, hybrid iterative reconstruction and filtered back-projection.
We scanned a 5-year anthropomorphic phantom at seven levels of radiation. We then reconstructed CT data with knowledge-based iterative reconstruction (iterative model reconstruction [IMR] levels 1, 2 and 3; Philips Healthcare, Andover, MA), hybrid iterative reconstruction (iDose(4), levels 3 and 7; Philips Healthcare, Andover, MA) and filtered back-projection. The noise, signal-to-noise ratio and contrast-to-noise ratio were calculated. We evaluated low-contrast resolutions and detectability by low-contrast targets and subjective and objective spatial resolutions by the line pairs and wire.
With radiation at 100 peak kVp and 100 mAs (3.64 mSv), the relative doses ranged from 5% (0.19 mSv) to 150% (5.46 mSv). Lower noise and higher signal-to-noise, contrast-to-noise and objective spatial resolution were generally achieved in ascending order of filtered back-projection, iDose(4) levels 3 and 7, and IMR levels 1, 2 and 3, at all radiation dose levels. Compared with filtered back-projection at 100% dose, similar noise levels were obtained on IMR level 2 images at 24% dose and iDose(4) level 3 images at 50% dose, respectively. Regarding low-contrast resolution, low-contrast detectability and objective spatial resolution, IMR level 2 images at 24% dose showed comparable image quality with filtered back-projection at 100% dose. Subjective spatial resolution was not greatly affected by reconstruction algorithm.
Reduced-dose IMR obtained at 0.92 mSv (24%) showed similar image quality to routine-dose filtered back-projection obtained at 3.64 mSv (100%), and half-dose iDose(4) obtained at 1.81 mSv.
儿童体模的CT检查可为基于知识的迭代重建CT的优化提供有用指导。
比较基于知识的迭代重建、混合迭代重建和滤波反投影在不同辐射剂量下重建的CT图像的辐射剂量和图像质量。
我们对一个5岁的仿真人体模型进行了7个辐射剂量水平的扫描。然后我们用基于知识的迭代重建(迭代模型重建[IMR]1级、2级和3级;飞利浦医疗保健公司,马萨诸塞州安多弗)、混合迭代重建(iDose(4),3级和7级;飞利浦医疗保健公司,马萨诸塞州安多弗)和滤波反投影对CT数据进行重建。计算噪声、信噪比和对比噪声比。我们通过低对比度目标评估低对比度分辨率和可探测性,并通过线对和金属丝评估主观和客观空间分辨率。
在100 kVp峰值和100 mAs(3.64 mSv)的辐射条件下,相对剂量范围为5%(0.19 mSv)至150%(5.46 mSv)。在所有辐射剂量水平下,通常按照滤波反投影、iDose(4) 3级和7级、IMR 1级、2级和3级的升序实现更低的噪声以及更高的信噪比、对比噪声比和客观空间分辨率。与100%剂量的滤波反投影相比,在24%剂量的IMR 2级图像和50%剂量的iDose(4) 3级图像上分别获得了相似的噪声水平。关于低对比度分辨率、低对比度可探测性和客观空间分辨率,24%剂量的IMR 2级图像显示出与100%剂量的滤波反投影相当的图像质量。主观空间分辨率受重建算法的影响不大。
在0.92 mSv(24%)时获得的低剂量IMR显示出与在3.64 mSv(100%)时获得的常规剂量滤波反投影以及在1.81 mSv时获得的半剂量iDose(4)相似的图像质量。