Suppr超能文献

基于知识的迭代模型重建:使用儿科计算机断层扫描体模进行图像质量和辐射剂量比较

Knowledge-based iterative model reconstruction: comparative image quality and radiation dose with a pediatric computed tomography phantom.

作者信息

Ryu Young Jin, Choi Young Hun, Cheon Jung-Eun, Ha Seongmin, Kim Woo Sun, Kim In-One

机构信息

Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital, 101 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul, 110-744, Korea.

Department of Radiology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

出版信息

Pediatr Radiol. 2016 Mar;46(3):303-15. doi: 10.1007/s00247-015-3486-6. Epub 2015 Nov 6.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

CT of pediatric phantoms can provide useful guidance to the optimization of knowledge-based iterative reconstruction CT.

OBJECTIVE

To compare radiation dose and image quality of CT images obtained at different radiation doses reconstructed with knowledge-based iterative reconstruction, hybrid iterative reconstruction and filtered back-projection.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We scanned a 5-year anthropomorphic phantom at seven levels of radiation. We then reconstructed CT data with knowledge-based iterative reconstruction (iterative model reconstruction [IMR] levels 1, 2 and 3; Philips Healthcare, Andover, MA), hybrid iterative reconstruction (iDose(4), levels 3 and 7; Philips Healthcare, Andover, MA) and filtered back-projection. The noise, signal-to-noise ratio and contrast-to-noise ratio were calculated. We evaluated low-contrast resolutions and detectability by low-contrast targets and subjective and objective spatial resolutions by the line pairs and wire.

RESULTS

With radiation at 100 peak kVp and 100 mAs (3.64 mSv), the relative doses ranged from 5% (0.19 mSv) to 150% (5.46 mSv). Lower noise and higher signal-to-noise, contrast-to-noise and objective spatial resolution were generally achieved in ascending order of filtered back-projection, iDose(4) levels 3 and 7, and IMR levels 1, 2 and 3, at all radiation dose levels. Compared with filtered back-projection at 100% dose, similar noise levels were obtained on IMR level 2 images at 24% dose and iDose(4) level 3 images at 50% dose, respectively. Regarding low-contrast resolution, low-contrast detectability and objective spatial resolution, IMR level 2 images at 24% dose showed comparable image quality with filtered back-projection at 100% dose. Subjective spatial resolution was not greatly affected by reconstruction algorithm.

CONCLUSION

Reduced-dose IMR obtained at 0.92 mSv (24%) showed similar image quality to routine-dose filtered back-projection obtained at 3.64 mSv (100%), and half-dose iDose(4) obtained at 1.81 mSv.

摘要

背景

儿童体模的CT检查可为基于知识的迭代重建CT的优化提供有用指导。

目的

比较基于知识的迭代重建、混合迭代重建和滤波反投影在不同辐射剂量下重建的CT图像的辐射剂量和图像质量。

材料与方法

我们对一个5岁的仿真人体模型进行了7个辐射剂量水平的扫描。然后我们用基于知识的迭代重建(迭代模型重建[IMR]1级、2级和3级;飞利浦医疗保健公司,马萨诸塞州安多弗)、混合迭代重建(iDose(4),3级和7级;飞利浦医疗保健公司,马萨诸塞州安多弗)和滤波反投影对CT数据进行重建。计算噪声、信噪比和对比噪声比。我们通过低对比度目标评估低对比度分辨率和可探测性,并通过线对和金属丝评估主观和客观空间分辨率。

结果

在100 kVp峰值和100 mAs(3.64 mSv)的辐射条件下,相对剂量范围为5%(0.19 mSv)至150%(5.46 mSv)。在所有辐射剂量水平下,通常按照滤波反投影、iDose(4) 3级和7级、IMR 1级、2级和3级的升序实现更低的噪声以及更高的信噪比、对比噪声比和客观空间分辨率。与100%剂量的滤波反投影相比,在24%剂量的IMR 2级图像和50%剂量的iDose(4) 3级图像上分别获得了相似的噪声水平。关于低对比度分辨率、低对比度可探测性和客观空间分辨率,24%剂量的IMR 2级图像显示出与100%剂量的滤波反投影相当的图像质量。主观空间分辨率受重建算法的影响不大。

结论

在0.92 mSv(24%)时获得的低剂量IMR显示出与在3.64 mSv(100%)时获得的常规剂量滤波反投影以及在1.81 mSv时获得的半剂量iDose(4)相似的图像质量。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验