• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

复杂动态的组织性工作残疾系统中的重返工作岗位

Return-to-Work Within a Complex and Dynamic Organizational Work Disability System.

作者信息

Jetha Arif, Pransky Glenn, Fish Jon, Hettinger Lawrence J

机构信息

Liberty Mutual Research Institute for Safety, 71 Frankland Road, Hopkinton, MA, 01748, USA.

Department of Work Environment, University of Massachusetts-Lowell, One University Avenue, Lowell, MA, 01854, USA.

出版信息

J Occup Rehabil. 2016 Sep;26(3):276-85. doi: 10.1007/s10926-015-9613-2.

DOI:10.1007/s10926-015-9613-2
PMID:26547909
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4967424/
Abstract

Background Return-to-work (RTW) within a complex organizational system can be associated with suboptimal outcomes. Purpose To apply a sociotechnical systems perspective to investigate complexity in RTW; to utilize system dynamics modeling (SDM) to examine how feedback relationships between individual, psychosocial, and organizational factors make up the work disability system and influence RTW. Methods SDMs were developed within two companies. Thirty stakeholders including senior managers, and frontline supervisors and workers participated in model building sessions. Participants were asked questions that elicited information about the structure of the work disability system and were translated into feedback loops. To parameterize the model, participants were asked to estimate the shape and magnitude of the relationship between key model components. Data from published literature were also accessed to supplement participant estimates. Data were entered into a model created in the software program Vensim. Simulations were conducted to examine how financial incentives and light duty work disability-related policies, utilized by the participating companies, influenced RTW likelihood and preparedness. Results The SDMs were multidimensional, including individual attitudinal characteristics, health factors, and organizational components. Among the causal pathways uncovered, psychosocial components including workplace social support, supervisor and co-worker pressure, and supervisor-frontline worker communication impacted RTW likelihood and preparedness. Interestingly, SDM simulations showed that work disability-related policies in both companies resulted in a diminishing or opposing impact on RTW preparedness and likelihood. Conclusion SDM provides a novel systems view of RTW. Policy and psychosocial component relationships within the system have important implications for RTW, and may contribute to unanticipated outcomes.

摘要

背景 在复杂的组织系统中重返工作岗位(RTW)可能会带来不尽人意的结果。目的 应用社会技术系统视角来研究RTW中的复杂性;利用系统动力学建模(SDM)来检验个体、心理社会和组织因素之间的反馈关系如何构成工作残疾系统并影响RTW。方法 在两家公司内开发了SDM。包括高级经理、一线主管和工人在内的30名利益相关者参与了模型构建会议。向参与者提出问题,引出有关工作残疾系统结构的信息,并将其转化为反馈回路。为了对模型进行参数化,要求参与者估计关键模型组件之间关系的形式和大小。还查阅了已发表文献中的数据以补充参与者的估计。将数据输入在Vensim软件程序中创建的模型。进行模拟以检验参与公司所采用的经济激励措施和与轻工作残疾相关的政策如何影响RTW的可能性和准备情况。结果 SDM是多维的,包括个体态度特征、健康因素和组织组件。在所发现的因果路径中,心理社会组件,包括工作场所的社会支持、主管和同事的压力以及主管与一线工人的沟通,影响了RTW的可能性和准备情况。有趣的是,SDM模拟表明,两家公司中与工作残疾相关的政策对RTW准备情况和可能性产生了递减或相反的影响。结论 SDM为RTW提供了一种新颖的系统视角。系统内的政策和心理社会组件关系对RTW具有重要意义,并且可能导致意外结果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/949f/4967424/f9405f164c04/10926_2015_9613_Fig2a_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/949f/4967424/3a244bc82dd0/10926_2015_9613_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/949f/4967424/f9405f164c04/10926_2015_9613_Fig2a_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/949f/4967424/3a244bc82dd0/10926_2015_9613_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/949f/4967424/f9405f164c04/10926_2015_9613_Fig2a_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Return-to-Work Within a Complex and Dynamic Organizational Work Disability System.复杂动态的组织性工作残疾系统中的重返工作岗位
J Occup Rehabil. 2016 Sep;26(3):276-85. doi: 10.1007/s10926-015-9613-2.
2
A Stakeholder-Based System Dynamics Model of Return-to-Work: A Research Protocol.基于利益相关者的重返工作岗位系统动力学模型:一项研究方案。
J Public Health Res. 2015 Jul 16;4(2):553. doi: 10.4081/jphr.2015.553.
3
Capturing complexity in work disability research: application of system dynamics modeling methodology.把握工作残疾研究中的复杂性:系统动力学建模方法的应用
Disabil Rehabil. 2016;38(2):189-94. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2015.1031291. Epub 2015 Apr 13.
4
Getting the Message Right: Evidence-Based Insights to Improve Organizational Return-to-Work Communication Practices.传递信息:改善组织重返工作岗位沟通实践的循证洞察。
J Occup Rehabil. 2021 Sep;31(3):652-663. doi: 10.1007/s10926-021-09961-y. Epub 2021 Feb 2.
5
Workplace managers' view of the role of co-workers in return-to-work.职场管理者对同事在重返工作岗位过程中所起作用的看法。
Disabil Rehabil. 2016 Nov;38(23):2324-33. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2015.1129447. Epub 2016 Jan 10.
6
Conceptualizing the dynamics of workplace stress: a systems-based study of nursing aides.构思工作场所压力的动态变化:一项基于系统的护理助理研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 Jan 5;17(1):12. doi: 10.1186/s12913-016-1955-8.
7
Not quite a win-win: the corporate agenda of the stay at work/return to work project.并非完全双赢:在职/返岗项目的企业议程
New Solut. 2015 May;25(1):4-24. doi: 10.1177/1048291115569023. Epub 2015 Mar 16.
8
Fear of (re)injury and return to work following compensable injury: qualitative insights from key stakeholders in Victoria, Australia.工伤赔偿后对(再)受伤及重返工作岗位的恐惧:来自澳大利亚维多利亚州关键利益相关者的定性见解
BMC Public Health. 2017 Apr 11;17(1):313. doi: 10.1186/s12889-017-4226-7.
9
Workplace Organizational and Psychosocial Factors Associated with Return-to-Work Interruption and Reinjury Among Workers with Permanent Impairment.与永久性损伤工人的工作中断和再损伤相关的工作场所组织和心理社会因素。
Ann Work Expo Health. 2021 Jun 12;65(5):566-580. doi: 10.1093/annweh/wxaa133.
10
The importance, measurement and practical implications of worker's expectations for return to work.工人对重返工作岗位的期望的重要性、衡量方法及实际影响。
Disabil Rehabil. 2015;37(20):1808-16. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2014.979299. Epub 2015 Jul 9.

引用本文的文献

1
Application of group model building in implementation research: A systematic review of the public health and healthcare literature.群体模式构建在实施研究中的应用:公共卫生和医疗保健文献的系统评价。
PLoS One. 2023 Aug 17;18(8):e0284765. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0284765. eCollection 2023.
2
Racial and Ethnic Inequities in the Return-to-Work of Workers Experiencing Injury or Illness: A Systematic Review.工人在受伤或患病后的重返工作岗位方面存在种族和民族不平等:系统评价。
J Occup Rehabil. 2023 Sep;33(3):432-449. doi: 10.1007/s10926-023-10119-1. Epub 2023 Jun 9.
3
Sustainable Return to Work for Workers with Mental Health and Musculoskeletal Conditions.心理健康和肌肉骨骼疾病患者的可持续工作回归
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Jan 6;20(2):1057. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20021057.
4
Linking job duties, functioning, and employment status using the Work-Disability Functional Assessment Battery (WD-FAB): An expert coding and quantitative analysis.运用工作-残疾功能评估量表(WD-FAB)对工作职责、功能和就业状况进行关联:专家编码和定量分析。
Work. 2023;74(1):75-87. doi: 10.3233/WOR-211169.
5
Getting the Message Right: Evidence-Based Insights to Improve Organizational Return-to-Work Communication Practices.传递信息:改善组织重返工作岗位沟通实践的循证洞察。
J Occup Rehabil. 2021 Sep;31(3):652-663. doi: 10.1007/s10926-021-09961-y. Epub 2021 Feb 2.
6
Dynamics of stress generation and reduction in the nursing team at an oncology center.肿瘤中心护理团队压力产生与缓解的动态变化
Rev Lat Am Enfermagem. 2019 Jul 18;27:e3156. doi: 10.1590/1518-8345.2874.3156.
7
Work Disability Management Communication Bottlenecks Within Large and Complex Public Service Organizations: A Sociotechnical Systems Study.大型复杂公共服务组织内工作残疾管理沟通的瓶颈:一项社会技术系统研究。
J Occup Rehabil. 2019 Dec;29(4):754-763. doi: 10.1007/s10926-019-09836-3.
8
Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Psychometric Evaluation of the Dutch Version of the Work Rehabilitation Questionnaire (WORQ-VL).工作康复问卷(WORQ-VL)荷兰语版的跨文化调适与心理计量评估。
J Occup Rehabil. 2019 Sep;29(3):514-525. doi: 10.1007/s10926-018-9812-8.
9
Recovery Within Injury Compensation Schemes: A System Mapping Study.伤补偿计划中的康复:系统映射研究。
J Occup Rehabil. 2019 Mar;29(1):52-63. doi: 10.1007/s10926-018-9764-z.
10
Workplace Social System and Sustained Return-to-Work: A Study of Supervisor and Co-worker Supportiveness and Injury Reaction.工作场所社会系统与持续重返工作岗位:主管和同事支持度与伤害反应的研究。
J Occup Rehabil. 2018 Sep;28(3):486-494. doi: 10.1007/s10926-017-9724-z.

本文引用的文献

1
A Stakeholder-Based System Dynamics Model of Return-to-Work: A Research Protocol.基于利益相关者的重返工作岗位系统动力学模型:一项研究方案。
J Public Health Res. 2015 Jul 16;4(2):553. doi: 10.4081/jphr.2015.553.
2
Capturing complexity in work disability research: application of system dynamics modeling methodology.把握工作残疾研究中的复杂性:系统动力学建模方法的应用
Disabil Rehabil. 2016;38(2):189-94. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2015.1031291. Epub 2015 Apr 13.
3
Returning to work following low back pain: towards a model of individual psychosocial factors.腰痛后重返工作岗位:迈向个体心理社会因素模型。
J Occup Rehabil. 2015 Mar;25(1):25-37. doi: 10.1007/s10926-014-9522-9.
4
A system dynamics approach for modeling construction workers' safety attitudes and behaviors.一种用于构建建筑工人安全态度和行为模型的系统动力学方法。
Accid Anal Prev. 2014 Jul;68:95-105. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2013.09.019. Epub 2013 Oct 1.
5
Buddies in bad times? the role of co-workers after a work-related injury.患难之交?工作相关伤害后同事的作用。
J Occup Rehabil. 2013 Sep;23(3):438-49. doi: 10.1007/s10926-012-9411-z.
6
Modelling the social determinants of health and simulating short-term and long-term intervention impacts for the city of Toronto, Canada.为加拿大的多伦多市建立健康的社会决定因素模型并模拟短期和长期干预措施的影响。
Soc Sci Med. 2013 Sep;93:247-55. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2012.06.036. Epub 2012 Oct 10.
7
Bearing the brunt: co-workers' experiences of work reintegration processes.首当其冲:同事在工作重返过程中的体验。
J Occup Rehabil. 2013 Mar;23(1):44-54. doi: 10.1007/s10926-012-9380-2.
8
Systems thinking perspectives applied to healthcare transition for youth with disabilities: a paradigm shift for practice, policy and research.系统思维视角应用于残疾青年的医疗保健过渡:实践、政策和研究的范式转变。
Child Care Health Dev. 2011 Nov;37(6):806-14. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2214.2011.01313.x.
9
Work in cancer survivors: a model for practice and research.癌症幸存者的工作:实践与研究的模式。
J Cancer Surviv. 2010 Dec;4(4):415-37. doi: 10.1007/s11764-010-0154-6. Epub 2010 Oct 14.
10
The "toxic dose" of system problems: why some injured workers don't return to work as expected.系统问题的“毒性剂量”:为何一些受伤工人未能如预期般重返工作岗位。
J Occup Rehabil. 2010 Sep;20(3):349-66. doi: 10.1007/s10926-010-9229-5.