Suppr超能文献

不同去除义齿黏附剂方法的交叉临床试验及其对口腔微生物群的影响。

Crossover clinical trial of different methods of removing a denture adhesive and the influence on the oral microbiota.

作者信息

Nunes Élen Massaro, Policastro Vivian Barnabé, Scavassin Priscila Mattos, Leite Andressa Rosa Perin, Mendoza Marin Danny Omar, Giro Gabriela, de Oliveira Júnior Norberto Martins, Compagnoni Marco Antonio, Pero Ana Carolina

机构信息

Graduate student, Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics, Araraquara Dental School, Sao Paulo State University (UNESP), Araraquara, Sao Paulo, Brazil.

Graduate student, Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics, Araraquara Dental School, Sao Paulo State University (UNESP). Araraquara, Sao Paulo, Brazil.

出版信息

J Prosthet Dent. 2016 Apr;115(4):462-8. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.08.004. Epub 2015 Nov 6.

Abstract

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM

The difficulty of removing denture adhesive is a common problem reported by users of these products.

PURPOSE

The purpose of this clinical study was to investigate the effectiveness of different cleaning protocols for removing a denture adhesive (DA) and the influence on the oral microbiota.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Twenty participants wearing well-fitting complete dentures were instructed to use a denture adhesive 3 times a day during a 4-week trial, divided into 4 stages: (A) control-3 daily denture brushings using water at ambient temperature, (B)-3 daily denture brushings using water at ambient temperature plus coconut soap, (C)-3 daily denture brushings using water at ambient temperature plus dentifrice; (D)-3 daily denture brushings using water at ambient temperature combined with immersion in sodium perborate solution for 5 minutes before nocturnal sleep. After each 1-week stage, saliva specimens were collected. A dye was used to display and quantify the remaining DA on the internal surface of the maxillary dentures as a percentage. For microbiological analysis, the saliva was diluted and plated onto Petri dishes containing a nonselective culture medium and Candida spp culture media. After the incubation period, Candida species were identified and the number of colony forming units (CFU/mL) was calculated.

RESULTS

A significant difference was found among the 4 cleaning methods for the quantification of remaining DA (Friedman, P=.036). Brushing the dentures with coconut soap, dentifrice, or water combined with immersion in sodium perborate solution was more effective in removing DA than brushing with only water. The cleaning methods did not influence the quantification of microorganisms in general or Candida albicans and other Candida species in particular.

CONCLUSIONS

Brushing the dentures with coconut soap, dentifrice, or water combined with immersion in sodium perborate solution was more effective for removing cream-type denture adhesive than brushing with only water.

摘要

问题陈述

去除假牙黏附剂存在困难是这些产品使用者报告的常见问题。

目的

本临床研究的目的是调查不同清洁方案去除假牙黏附剂(DA)的有效性及其对口腔微生物群的影响。

材料与方法

20名佩戴合适全口假牙的参与者在为期4周的试验中被指示每天使用3次假牙黏附剂,试验分为4个阶段:(A)对照组——每天用常温的水刷洗假牙3次;(B)——每天用常温的水加椰子皂刷洗假牙3次;(C)——每天用常温的水加牙膏刷洗假牙3次;(D)——每天用常温的水刷洗假牙3次,并在夜间睡眠前将假牙浸泡在过硼酸钠溶液中5分钟。在每个为期1周的阶段结束后,收集唾液样本。使用一种染料来显示和量化上颌假牙内表面上剩余的DA,并以百分比表示。对于微生物分析,将唾液稀释后接种到含有非选择性培养基和念珠菌属培养基的培养皿上。在培养期后,鉴定念珠菌种类并计算菌落形成单位(CFU/mL)的数量。

结果

在4种清洁方法对剩余DA的量化方面发现了显著差异(Friedman检验,P = 0.036)。用椰子皂、牙膏或水结合浸泡过硼酸钠溶液刷洗假牙比只用清水刷洗在去除DA方面更有效。一般而言,清洁方法对微生物的量化没有影响,特别是对白色念珠菌和其他念珠菌种类没有影响。

结论

用椰子皂、牙膏或水结合浸泡过硼酸钠溶液刷洗假牙在去除乳膏型假牙黏附剂方面比只用清水刷洗更有效。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验