• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Optimizing Clinical Research Participant Selection with Informatics.利用信息学优化临床研究参与者的选择
Trends Pharmacol Sci. 2015 Nov;36(11):706-709. doi: 10.1016/j.tips.2015.08.007.
2
Clinical Research Informatics for Big Data and Precision Medicine.大数据与精准医学的临床研究信息学
Yearb Med Inform. 2016 Nov 10(1):211-218. doi: 10.15265/IY-2016-019.
3
Information Technology for Clinical, Translational and Comparative Effectiveness Research. Findings from the Yearbook 2015 Section on Clinical Research Informatics.用于临床、转化和比较效果研究的信息技术。《2015年年鉴》临床研究信息学部分的研究结果。
Yearb Med Inform. 2015 Aug 13;10(1):178-82. doi: 10.15265/IY-2015-030.
4
Clinical Research Informatics Contributions from 2015.2015年临床研究信息学的贡献。
Yearb Med Inform. 2016 Nov 10(1):219-223. doi: 10.15265/IY-2016-044.
5
Clinical Research Informatics: Recent Advances and Future Directions.临床研究信息学:最新进展与未来方向。
Yearb Med Inform. 2015 Aug 13;10(1):174-7. doi: 10.15265/IY-2015-010.
6
Clinical Research Informatics: Supporting the Research Study Lifecycle.临床研究信息学:支持研究项目生命周期
Yearb Med Inform. 2017 Aug;26(1):193-200. doi: 10.15265/IY-2017-022. Epub 2017 Sep 11.
7
The everyday ethics of field work research with vulnerable patients.针对弱势患者的实地研究日常伦理规范。
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2014;205:813-7.
8
Future developments of medical informatics from the viewpoint of networked clinical research. Interoperability and integration.从网络临床研究角度看医学信息学的未来发展。互操作性与整合性。
Methods Inf Med. 2009;48(1):45-54.
9
Editorial note on biomedical and health informatics.关于生物医学与健康信息学的编辑按语
IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed. 2011 Mar;15(2):175-7. doi: 10.1109/TITB.2011.2119410.
10
Biomedical informatics: changing what physicians need to know and how they learn.生物医学信息学:改变医生需要了解的知识和学习方式。
Acad Med. 2011 Apr;86(4):429-34. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181f41e8c.

引用本文的文献

1
Computational strategic recruitment for representation and coverage studied in the All of Us Research Program.在“我们所有人研究计划”中对用于代表性和覆盖范围的计算策略招募进行了研究。
NPJ Digit Med. 2025 Jul 3;8(1):402. doi: 10.1038/s41746-025-01804-x.
2
Optimizing Exclusion Criteria for Clinical Trials of Persistent Lyme Disease Using Real-World Data.利用真实世界数据优化持续性莱姆病临床试验的排除标准
Healthcare (Basel). 2024 Dec 25;13(1):20. doi: 10.3390/healthcare13010020.
3
AutoCriteria: a generalizable clinical trial eligibility criteria extraction system powered by large language models.AutoCriteria:一个由大型语言模型驱动的可推广的临床试验纳入标准提取系统。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2024 Jan 18;31(2):375-385. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocad218.
4
A data-driven approach to optimizing clinical study eligibility criteria.基于数据的临床研究纳入标准优化方法。
J Biomed Inform. 2023 Jun;142:104375. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2023.104375. Epub 2023 May 2.
5
A Representativeness-informed Model for Research Record Selection from Electronic Medical Record Systems.从电子病历系统中选择研究记录的代表性信息模型。
AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2023 Apr 29;2022:259-268. eCollection 2022.
6
Performance of EHR classifiers for patient eligibility in a clinical trial of precision screening.电子病历分类器在精准筛查临床试验中患者入选的性能。
Contemp Clin Trials. 2022 Oct;121:106926. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2022.106926. Epub 2022 Sep 14.
7
ELaPro, a LOINC-mapped core dataset for top laboratory procedures of eligibility screening for clinical trials.ELaPro,一个 LOINC 映射的核心数据集,用于临床试验资格筛选的顶级实验室程序。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2022 May 14;22(1):141. doi: 10.1186/s12874-022-01611-y.
8
Combining human and machine intelligence for clinical trial eligibility querying.结合人类与机器智能进行临床试验资格查询。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2022 Jun 14;29(7):1161-1171. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocac051.
9
Leveraging electronic health record data for clinical trial planning by assessing eligibility criteria's impact on patient count and safety.利用电子健康记录数据评估纳入标准对患者数量和安全性的影响,从而为临床试验规划提供依据。
J Biomed Inform. 2022 Mar;127:104032. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2022.104032. Epub 2022 Feb 18.
10
A systematic review on natural language processing systems for eligibility prescreening in clinical research.自然语言处理系统在临床研究资格筛选中的应用:系统评价
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2021 Dec 28;29(1):197-206. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocab228.

本文引用的文献

1
Assessing the Collective Population Representativeness of Related Type 2 Diabetes Trials by Combining Public Data from ClinicalTrials.gov and NHANES.通过整合ClinicalTrials.gov和美国国家健康与营养检查调查(NHANES)的公共数据评估2型糖尿病相关试验的总体人群代表性
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2015;216:569-73.
2
Patient centric approach for clinical trials: Current trend and new opportunities.以患者为中心的临床试验方法:当前趋势与新机遇。
Perspect Clin Res. 2015 Jul-Sep;6(3):134-8. doi: 10.4103/2229-3485.159936.
3
Modernizing Eligibility Criteria for Molecularly Driven Trials.分子驱动试验的资格标准现代化。
J Clin Oncol. 2015 Sep 1;33(25):2815-20. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2015.62.1854. Epub 2015 Jul 20.
4
Visual aggregate analysis of eligibility features of clinical trials.临床试验合格特征的可视化综合分析。
J Biomed Inform. 2015 Apr;54:241-55. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2015.01.005. Epub 2015 Jan 20.
5
A distribution-based method for assessing the differences between clinical trial target populations and patient populations in electronic health records.一种基于分布的方法,用于评估电子健康记录中的临床试验目标人群和患者人群之间的差异。
Appl Clin Inform. 2014 May 7;5(2):463-79. doi: 10.4338/ACI-2013-12-RA-0105. eCollection 2014.
6
Sick patients have more data: the non-random completeness of electronic health records.患病患者拥有更多数据:电子健康记录的非随机完整性。
AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2013 Nov 16;2013:1472-7. eCollection 2013.
7
Clustering clinical trials with similar eligibility criteria features.对具有相似纳入标准特征的临床试验进行聚类。
J Biomed Inform. 2014 Dec;52:112-20. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2014.01.009. Epub 2014 Feb 1.
8
Methods and dimensions of electronic health record data quality assessment: enabling reuse for clinical research.电子健康记录数据质量评估的方法和维度:为临床研究提供可重用性。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2013 Jan 1;20(1):144-51. doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2011-000681. Epub 2012 Jun 25.
9
Analysis of eligibility criteria complexity in clinical trials.临床试验中资格标准复杂性分析
Summit Transl Bioinform. 2010 Mar 1;2010:46-50.
10
Formal representation of eligibility criteria: a literature review.资格标准的形式化表示:文献综述。
J Biomed Inform. 2010 Jun;43(3):451-67. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2009.12.004. Epub 2009 Dec 23.

利用信息学优化临床研究参与者的选择

Optimizing Clinical Research Participant Selection with Informatics.

作者信息

Weng Chunhua

机构信息

Department of Biomedical Informatics, Columbia University, 622 W 168 Street, PH-20, Room 407, New York, NY 10032, USA.

出版信息

Trends Pharmacol Sci. 2015 Nov;36(11):706-709. doi: 10.1016/j.tips.2015.08.007.

DOI:10.1016/j.tips.2015.08.007
PMID:26549161
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4686428/
Abstract

Clinical research participants are often not reflective of real-world patients due to overly restrictive eligibility criteria. Meanwhile, unselected participants introduce confounding factors and reduce research efficiency. Biomedical informatics, especially Big Data increasingly made available from electronic health records, offers promising aids to optimize research participant selection through data-driven transparency.

摘要

由于入选标准过于严格,临床研究参与者往往不能反映真实世界的患者情况。与此同时,未经筛选的参与者会引入混杂因素并降低研究效率。生物医学信息学,尤其是电子健康记录中越来越多的大数据,为通过数据驱动的透明度优化研究参与者选择提供了有前景的辅助手段。