Suppr超能文献

在合格健康声称中传递科学证据。

Communicating scientific evidence in qualified health claims.

机构信息

a Department of Nutritional Sciences , Rutgers University , New Brunswick , New Jersey , USA.

b Department of Human Ecology , Rutgers University , New Brunswick , New Jersey , USA.

出版信息

Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2017 Sep 2;57(13):2811-2824. doi: 10.1080/10408398.2015.1069730.

Abstract

Qualified health claims (QHCs) are found on food and dietary supplement labels and aim to communicate the quality and strength of scientific evidence for a diet-disease relationship. Since the evidence varies for diet-disease relationships, the language to describe the evidence also varies. However, research indicates that consumers misinterpret QHCs as a whole product evaluation. The FDA is reviewing the evidence ranking system for QHCs and the current study aims to inform future consumer research. A content analysis examined the language used to convey scientific evidence in 53 QHCs and organized them into an intrinsic scale of evidence. Results revealed 36 formats to present the evidence in 53 QHCs. Seventy-seven percent (n = 41) demonstrate a reading level above 9th grade. Most claims describe the quality of evidence (n = 51, 96%) ("very weak") and/or reference its consistency (n = 41, 77%), while a quarter (n = 13) also quantify the evidence ("two studies"). Twenty-five claims (47%) present the evidence before stating the diet-disease relationship. There is an absence of a systematic description of evidence among QHCs that may contribute to the misleading, albeit unintentional, nature of these claims. Policymakers might consider reforming QHC regulations so that a hierarchy of evidence for diet-disease relationships is clearly communicated to consumers.

摘要

合格声称(Qualified Health Claims,QHCs)出现在食品和膳食补充剂标签上,旨在传达与饮食-疾病关系相关的科学证据的质量和强度。由于饮食-疾病关系的证据各不相同,用于描述证据的语言也有所不同。然而,研究表明,消费者错误地将 QHC 视为对整个产品的评价。FDA 正在审查 QHC 的证据排名系统,本研究旨在为未来的消费者研究提供信息。一项内容分析检查了 53 个 QHC 中用于传达科学证据的语言,并将其组织成一个内在的证据尺度。结果显示,在 53 个 QHC 中有 36 种呈现证据的格式。77%(n=41)的证据显示阅读水平高于 9 年级。大多数声明都描述了证据的质量(n=51,96%)(“非常弱”)和/或参考了其一致性(n=41,77%),而四分之一(n=13)的声明还量化了证据(“两项研究”)。25 项声明(47%)在陈述饮食-疾病关系之前提出了证据。QHC 中缺乏对证据的系统描述,这可能导致这些声明具有误导性,尽管是无意的。政策制定者可能会考虑改革 QHC 法规,以便向消费者清楚地传达饮食-疾病关系的证据层次结构。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验