Vijayaraghavan Maya, Hurst Samantha, Pierce John P
1 Cancer Prevention and Control Division, Moores UCSD Cancer Center, University of California, San Diego.
2 Division of Health Policy, Department of Family Medicine and Public Health, University of California, San Diego.
Am J Health Promot. 2017 May;31(3):243-250. doi: 10.4278/ajhp.150318-QUAL-781. Epub 2015 Nov 11.
To examine attitudes toward smoke-free policies and perceptions of e-cigarette use among homeless adults.
A cross-sectional qualitative study was conducted.
Study setting comprised seven transitional homeless shelters with indoor smoke-free policies in San Diego County; facilities differed in outdoor restrictions on smoking.
Sixty-six current or former smokers were the study participants.
Participants completed a questionnaire on smoking behaviors, perceived antitobacco norms, and attitudes toward smoke-free policies, and attended a focus group interview that explored these topics. We used a directed content analysis approach to analyze the focus group transcripts.
Clients in facilities with outdoor restrictions on smoking had stronger perceived antitobacco norms than those in facilities without such restrictions. We identified the following major themes: attitudes toward smoke-free policies, the use of e-cigarettes, the addictive potential of cigarettes, vulnerability to tobacco industry marketing, and interest in smoking cessation. The consensus was that smoke-free policies were important because they limited secondhand smoke exposure to nonsmokers and children. All were curious about e-cigarettes, particularly if they could be smoked in areas where smoking was prohibited and/or used as a cessation aid.
In this study of homeless adults, there was strong support for indoor and outdoor smoke-free policies. However, misperceptions that e-cigarettes could be used indoors could threaten antitobacco norms, highlighting opportunities to educate about the potential risks of e-cigarette use among homeless individuals.
研究无家可归成年人对无烟政策的态度以及对电子烟使用的认知。
开展了一项横断面定性研究。
研究背景包括圣地亚哥县七家实行室内无烟政策的过渡性无家可归者收容所;各设施在室外吸烟限制方面存在差异。
66名当前或曾经的吸烟者为研究参与者。
参与者完成了一份关于吸烟行为、感知到的反烟草规范以及对无烟政策态度的问卷,并参加了一个探讨这些主题的焦点小组访谈。我们采用定向内容分析法来分析焦点小组访谈记录。
在室外有吸烟限制的设施中的客户比没有此类限制的设施中的客户有更强的感知到的反烟草规范。我们确定了以下主要主题:对无烟政策的态度、电子烟的使用、香烟的成瘾潜力、对烟草行业营销的易感性以及戒烟兴趣。共识是无烟政策很重要,因为它们限制了非吸烟者和儿童接触二手烟。所有人都对电子烟感到好奇,特别是如果它们可以在禁止吸烟的区域使用和/或用作戒烟辅助工具。
在这项针对无家可归成年人的研究中,对室内和室外无烟政策有强烈支持。然而,认为电子烟可在室内使用的误解可能会威胁到反烟草规范,这凸显了对无家可归者开展关于电子烟使用潜在风险教育的机会。