• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Smoking Policy Change Within Permanent Supportive Housing.在永久性支持性住房中实施禁烟政策。
J Community Health. 2018 Apr;43(2):312-320. doi: 10.1007/s10900-017-0423-7.
2
Health, Secondhand Smoke Exposure, and Smoking Behavior Impacts of No-Smoking Policies in Public Housing, Colorado, 2014-2015.2014 - 2015年科罗拉多州公共住房禁烟政策对健康、二手烟暴露及吸烟行为的影响
Prev Chronic Dis. 2016 Oct 20;13:E148. doi: 10.5888/pcd13.160008.
3
Smoke-Free or Not: Attitudes Toward Indoor Smoke-Free Policies Among Permanent Supportive Housing Residents.无烟环境与否:永久性支持性住房居民对室内禁烟政策的态度。
Am J Health Promot. 2020 Jan;34(1):32-41. doi: 10.1177/0890117119876763. Epub 2019 Sep 19.
4
Clearing the Air: Smoke-Free Housing Policies, Smoking, and Secondhand Smoke Exposure Among Affordable Housing Residents in Minnesota, 2014-2015.净化空气:2014 - 2015年明尼苏达州经济适用房居民的无烟住房政策、吸烟与二手烟暴露情况
Prev Chronic Dis. 2016 Aug 18;13:E111. doi: 10.5888/pcd13.160195.
5
The smoke-free home study: study protocol for a cluster randomized controlled trial of a smoke-free home intervention in permanent supportive housing.无烟家庭研究:一项在永久性支持性住房中实施无烟家庭干预的集群随机对照试验的研究方案。
BMC Public Health. 2022 Nov 14;22(1):2076. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-14423-y.
6
Smoke-Free Home Intervention in Permanent Supportive Housing: A Multifaceted Intervention Pilot.无烟家庭干预在永久性支持性住房中的应用:一项多方面干预试验。
Nicotine Tob Res. 2021 Jan 7;23(1):63-70. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntaa043.
7
A protocol for measuring the impact of a smoke-free housing policy on indoor tobacco smoke exposure.测量无烟住房政策对室内烟草烟雾暴露影响的方案。
BMC Public Health. 2019 May 30;19(1):666. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-7043-3.
8
Developing Tobacco Control Interventions in Permanent Supportive Housing for Formerly Homeless Adults.为曾经无家可归的成年人在永久性支持性住房中开展烟草控制干预措施。
Health Promot Pract. 2020 Nov;21(6):972-982. doi: 10.1177/1524839919839358. Epub 2019 Apr 11.
9
Secondhand Smoke Exposure and Smoke-Free Policy Support Among Public Housing Authority Residents in Rural and Tribal Settings.农村和部落地区公共住房管理局居民的二手烟暴露情况及无烟政策支持度
J Community Health. 2016 Dec;41(6):1116-1121. doi: 10.1007/s10900-016-0204-8.
10
Secondhand smoke in outdoor settings: smokers' consumption, non-smokers' perceptions, and attitudes towards smoke-free legislation in Spain.室外环境中的二手烟:西班牙吸烟者的消费量、非吸烟者的认知以及对无烟立法的态度。
BMJ Open. 2015 Apr 8;5(4):e007554. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-007554.

引用本文的文献

1
Cigarette smoke-free home adoption attempts among formerly homeless adults living in permanent supportive housing.居住在永久性支持性住房中的曾经无家可归成年人尝试采用无烟家庭环境。
Drug Alcohol Depend Rep. 2025 Jul 22;16:100363. doi: 10.1016/j.dadr.2025.100363. eCollection 2025 Sep.
2
The Built Environment, PTSD Symptoms, and Tobacco Use among Permanent Supportive Housing Residents.永久性支持性住房居民的建筑环境、创伤后应激障碍症状与烟草使用情况
J Community Health. 2025 Apr;50(2):369-376. doi: 10.1007/s10900-024-01422-w. Epub 2024 Dec 16.
3
The smoke-free home study: study protocol for a cluster randomized controlled trial of a smoke-free home intervention in permanent supportive housing.无烟家庭研究:一项在永久性支持性住房中实施无烟家庭干预的集群随机对照试验的研究方案。
BMC Public Health. 2022 Nov 14;22(1):2076. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-14423-y.
4
Public Housing Resident Perspectives on Smoking, Barriers for Smoking Cessation, and Changes in Smoking Mandates.公屋居民对吸烟的看法、戒烟障碍以及吸烟禁令变化。
Inquiry. 2022 Jan-Dec;59:469580221092814. doi: 10.1177/00469580221092814.
5
E-Cigarette Use among Current Smokers Experiencing Homelessness.当前有 homelessness 经历的吸烟者中使用电子烟的情况。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Apr 1;18(7):3691. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18073691.
6
Advancing Housing and Health: Promoting Smoking Cessation in Permanent Supportive Housing.推进住房与健康:在永久性支持性住房中促进戒烟
Public Health Rep. 2020 Jul/Aug;135(4):415-419. doi: 10.1177/0033354920922374. Epub 2020 Apr 30.
7
Smoke-Free Home Intervention in Permanent Supportive Housing: A Multifaceted Intervention Pilot.无烟家庭干预在永久性支持性住房中的应用:一项多方面干预试验。
Nicotine Tob Res. 2021 Jan 7;23(1):63-70. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntaa043.
8
Developing Tobacco Control Interventions in Permanent Supportive Housing for Formerly Homeless Adults.为曾经无家可归的成年人在永久性支持性住房中开展烟草控制干预措施。
Health Promot Pract. 2020 Nov;21(6):972-982. doi: 10.1177/1524839919839358. Epub 2019 Apr 11.

本文引用的文献

1
Current Cigarette Smoking Among Adults - United States, 2005-2015.当前美国成年人吸烟状况 - 2005-2015 年。
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2016 Nov 11;65(44):1205-1211. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6544a2.
2
The effectiveness of tobacco control policies on vulnerable populations in the USA: a review.美国烟草控制政策对弱势群体的有效性:一项综述。
Postgrad Med J. 2016 Nov;92(1093):670-676. doi: 10.1136/postgradmedj-2014-133193. Epub 2016 Sep 22.
3
Medicaid Tobacco Cessation: Big Gaps Remain In Efforts To Get Smokers To Quit.医疗补助计划的戒烟举措:促使吸烟者戒烟的努力仍存在巨大差距。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2016 Jan;35(1):62-70. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2015.0756.
4
A Qualitative Examination of Smoke-Free Policies and Electronic Cigarettes Among Sheltered Homeless Adults.对无家可归的成年人庇护所中无烟政策与电子烟的定性研究
Am J Health Promot. 2017 May;31(3):243-250. doi: 10.4278/ajhp.150318-QUAL-781. Epub 2015 Nov 11.
5
Interest in Smoking Cessation Related to a Smoke-Free Policy Among Homeless Adults.无家可归成年人中与无烟政策相关的戒烟意愿
J Community Health. 2015 Aug;40(4):686-91. doi: 10.1007/s10900-014-9985-9.
6
Smoking policy change at a homeless shelter: attitudes and effects.无家可归者收容所的吸烟政策变化:态度与影响
Addict Behav. 2015 Jan;40:51-6. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2014.08.013. Epub 2014 Sep 6.
7
Aging in place within permanent supportive housing.在永久性支持性住房中就地养老。
Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2015 Jan;30(1):80-7. doi: 10.1002/gps.4120. Epub 2014 Apr 16.
8
Permanent supportive housing: assessing the evidence.永久性支持性住房:评估证据
Psychiatr Serv. 2014 Mar 1;65(3):287-94. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.201300261.
9
Permanent supportive housing: addressing homelessness and health disparities?永久性支持性住房:解决无家可归和健康差距问题?
Am J Public Health. 2013 Dec;103 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S188-92. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2013.301490. Epub 2013 Oct 22.
10
Mortality among homeless adults in Boston: shifts in causes of death over a 15-year period.波士顿无家可归成年人的死亡率:15 年间死因变化情况。
JAMA Intern Med. 2013 Feb 11;173(3):189-95. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.1604.

在永久性支持性住房中实施禁烟政策。

Smoking Policy Change Within Permanent Supportive Housing.

机构信息

School of Nursing, Loma Linda University, Loma Linda, CA, USA.

Department of Epidemiology, UC Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, USA.

出版信息

J Community Health. 2018 Apr;43(2):312-320. doi: 10.1007/s10900-017-0423-7.

DOI:10.1007/s10900-017-0423-7
PMID:28884243
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5832576/
Abstract

Smoke-free policies effectively reduce secondhand smoke (SHS) exposure among non-smokers, and reduce consumption, encourage quit attempts, and minimize relapse to smoking among smokers. Such policies are uncommon in permanent supportive housing (PSH) for formerly homeless individuals. In this study, we collaborated with a PSH provider in San Diego, California to assess a smoke-free policy that restricted indoor smoking. Between August and November 2015, residents completed a pre-policy questionnaire on attitudes toward smoke-free policies and exposure to secondhand smoke, and then 7-9 months after policy implementation residents were re-surveyed. At follow-up, there was a 59.7% reduction in indoor smoking. The proportion of residents who identified as current smokers reduced by 13% (95% CI: -38, 10.2). The proportion of residents who reported never smelling SHS indoors (apartment 24.2%, 95% CI: 4.2, 44.1; shared areas 17.2%, 95% CI: 1.7, 32.7); in outdoor areas next to the living unit (porches or patio 56.7%, 95% CI: 40.7, 72.8); and in other outdoor areas (parking lot 28.6%, 95% CI: 8.3, 48.9) was lower post-policy compared with pre-policy. Overall, resident support increased by 18.7%; however, the greatest increase in support occurred among current smokers (from 14.8 to 37.5%). Fewer current smokers reported that the policy would enable cessation at post-policy compared to pre-policy. Our findings demonstrate the feasibility of implementing smoke-free policies in PSH for formerly homeless adults. However, policy alone appears insufficient to trigger change in smoking behavior, highlighting the need for additional cessation resources to facilitate quitting.

摘要

无烟政策有效地减少了非吸烟者接触二手烟(SHS),减少了吸烟者的吸烟量,鼓励他们尝试戒烟,并最大限度地减少他们重新吸烟的可能性。这种政策在为无家可归者提供的永久性支持性住房(PSH)中并不常见。在这项研究中,我们与加利福尼亚州圣地亚哥的一家 PSH 供应商合作,评估了一项限制室内吸烟的无烟政策。在 2015 年 8 月至 11 月期间,居民们完成了一份关于对无烟政策的态度和接触二手烟的预政策问卷,然后在政策实施 7-9 个月后对居民进行了重新调查。在随访时,室内吸烟减少了 59.7%。自报为当前吸烟者的居民比例减少了 13%(95%CI:-38,10.2)。报告从未在室内闻到二手烟的居民比例(公寓 24.2%,95%CI:4.2,44.1;共享区域 17.2%,95%CI:1.7,32.7);在居住单元旁边的户外区域(门廊或露台 56.7%,95%CI:40.7,72.8);以及其他户外区域(停车场 28.6%,95%CI:8.3,48.9),在政策实施后比政策实施前更低。总的来说,居民的支持率增加了 18.7%;然而,最大的支持增长发生在当前吸烟者中(从 14.8%增加到 37.5%)。与政策实施前相比,较少的当前吸烟者报告说该政策将有助于他们戒烟。我们的研究结果表明,在为无家可归的成年人提供的永久性支持性住房中实施无烟政策是可行的。然而,仅靠政策似乎不足以改变吸烟行为,这突显了需要额外的戒烟资源来促进戒烟。