School of Nursing, Loma Linda University, Loma Linda, CA, USA.
Department of Epidemiology, UC Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, USA.
J Community Health. 2018 Apr;43(2):312-320. doi: 10.1007/s10900-017-0423-7.
Smoke-free policies effectively reduce secondhand smoke (SHS) exposure among non-smokers, and reduce consumption, encourage quit attempts, and minimize relapse to smoking among smokers. Such policies are uncommon in permanent supportive housing (PSH) for formerly homeless individuals. In this study, we collaborated with a PSH provider in San Diego, California to assess a smoke-free policy that restricted indoor smoking. Between August and November 2015, residents completed a pre-policy questionnaire on attitudes toward smoke-free policies and exposure to secondhand smoke, and then 7-9 months after policy implementation residents were re-surveyed. At follow-up, there was a 59.7% reduction in indoor smoking. The proportion of residents who identified as current smokers reduced by 13% (95% CI: -38, 10.2). The proportion of residents who reported never smelling SHS indoors (apartment 24.2%, 95% CI: 4.2, 44.1; shared areas 17.2%, 95% CI: 1.7, 32.7); in outdoor areas next to the living unit (porches or patio 56.7%, 95% CI: 40.7, 72.8); and in other outdoor areas (parking lot 28.6%, 95% CI: 8.3, 48.9) was lower post-policy compared with pre-policy. Overall, resident support increased by 18.7%; however, the greatest increase in support occurred among current smokers (from 14.8 to 37.5%). Fewer current smokers reported that the policy would enable cessation at post-policy compared to pre-policy. Our findings demonstrate the feasibility of implementing smoke-free policies in PSH for formerly homeless adults. However, policy alone appears insufficient to trigger change in smoking behavior, highlighting the need for additional cessation resources to facilitate quitting.
无烟政策有效地减少了非吸烟者接触二手烟(SHS),减少了吸烟者的吸烟量,鼓励他们尝试戒烟,并最大限度地减少他们重新吸烟的可能性。这种政策在为无家可归者提供的永久性支持性住房(PSH)中并不常见。在这项研究中,我们与加利福尼亚州圣地亚哥的一家 PSH 供应商合作,评估了一项限制室内吸烟的无烟政策。在 2015 年 8 月至 11 月期间,居民们完成了一份关于对无烟政策的态度和接触二手烟的预政策问卷,然后在政策实施 7-9 个月后对居民进行了重新调查。在随访时,室内吸烟减少了 59.7%。自报为当前吸烟者的居民比例减少了 13%(95%CI:-38,10.2)。报告从未在室内闻到二手烟的居民比例(公寓 24.2%,95%CI:4.2,44.1;共享区域 17.2%,95%CI:1.7,32.7);在居住单元旁边的户外区域(门廊或露台 56.7%,95%CI:40.7,72.8);以及其他户外区域(停车场 28.6%,95%CI:8.3,48.9),在政策实施后比政策实施前更低。总的来说,居民的支持率增加了 18.7%;然而,最大的支持增长发生在当前吸烟者中(从 14.8%增加到 37.5%)。与政策实施前相比,较少的当前吸烟者报告说该政策将有助于他们戒烟。我们的研究结果表明,在为无家可归的成年人提供的永久性支持性住房中实施无烟政策是可行的。然而,仅靠政策似乎不足以改变吸烟行为,这突显了需要额外的戒烟资源来促进戒烟。