Moraschini Vittorio, Barboza Eliane dos Santos Porto
Department of Periodontology, School of Dentistry, Fluminense Federal University, Niterói, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
J Periodontol. 2016 Mar;87(3):281-90. doi: 10.1902/jop.2015.150420. Epub 2015 Nov 12.
The aim of this systematic review is to evaluate the effects of platelet-rich fibrin (PRF) membranes on the outcomes of clinical treatments in patients with gingival recession.
Articles that were published before June 2015 were searched electronically in four databases without any date or language restrictions and searched manually in regular journals and unpublished studies. The eligibility criteria comprised randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and prospective controlled trials with follow-up periods of ≥ 6 months that compared the performance of PRF to other biomaterials in the treatment of Miller Class I or II gingival recessions. For the meta-analysis, the inverse variance method was used in fixed- or random-effect models, which were chosen according to heterogeneity. The estimates of the intervention effects were expressed as the mean differences in percentages or millimeters.
Six RCTs and one prospective clinical trial are included in this review. Root coverage (RC) and clinical attachment level (CAL) did not differ significantly between the analyzed subgroups (P = 0.57 and P = 0.50, respectively). The keratinized mucosa width (KMW) gain was significantly greater (P = 0.04) in the subgroup that was treated with connective tissue grafts.
The results of the meta-analysis suggest that the use of PRF membranes did not improve the RC, KMW, or CAL of Miller Class I and II gingival recessions compared with the other treatment modalities.
本系统评价的目的是评估富血小板纤维蛋白(PRF)膜对牙龈退缩患者临床治疗效果的影响。
在四个数据库中对2015年6月之前发表的文章进行电子检索,无任何日期或语言限制,并在正规期刊和未发表的研究中进行手动检索。纳入标准包括随机对照试验(RCT)和随访期≥6个月的前瞻性对照试验,这些试验比较了PRF与其他生物材料在治疗米勒I类或II类牙龈退缩中的性能。对于荟萃分析,根据异质性在固定效应模型或随机效应模型中使用逆方差法。干预效果的估计值以百分比或毫米的平均差异表示。
本评价纳入了6项RCT和1项前瞻性临床试验。分析的亚组之间,牙根覆盖(RC)和临床附着水平(CAL)差异无统计学意义(分别为P = 0.57和P = 0.50)。接受结缔组织移植治疗的亚组中,角化黏膜宽度(KMW)增加显著更大(P = 0.04)。
荟萃分析结果表明,与其他治疗方式相比,使用PRF膜并未改善米勒I类和II类牙龈退缩的RC、KMW或CAL。