• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

医院信息系统属性的重要性-绩效分析:护士视角

An importance-performance analysis of hospital information system attributes: A nurses' perspective.

作者信息

Cohen Jason F, Coleman Emma, Kangethe Matheri J

机构信息

University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.

University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.

出版信息

Int J Med Inform. 2016 Feb;86:82-90. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2015.10.010. Epub 2015 Nov 4.

DOI:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2015.10.010
PMID:26564330
Abstract

PURPOSE

Health workers have numerous concerns about hospital IS (HIS) usage. Addressing these concerns requires understanding the system attributes most important to their satisfaction and productivity. Following a recent HIS implementation, our objective was to identify priorities for managerial intervention based on user evaluations of the performance of the HIS attributes as well as the relative importance of these attributes to user satisfaction and productivity outcomes.

PROCEDURES

We collected data along a set of attributes representing system quality, data quality, information quality, and service quality from 154 nurse users. Their quantitative responses were analysed using the partial least squares approach followed by an importance-performance analysis. Qualitative responses were analysed using thematic analysis to triangulate and supplement the quantitative findings.

MAIN FINDINGS

Two system quality attributes (responsiveness and ease of learning), one information quality attribute (detail), one service quality attribute (sufficient support), and three data quality attributes (records complete, accurate and never missing) were identified as high priorities for intervention.

CONCLUSIONS

Our application of importance-performance analysis is unique in HIS evaluation and we have illustrated its utility for identifying those system attributes for which underperformance is not acceptable to users and therefore should be high priorities for intervention.

摘要

目的

医护人员对医院信息系统(HIS)的使用存在诸多担忧。要解决这些担忧,需要了解对他们的满意度和工作效率最为重要的系统属性。在近期实施医院信息系统之后,我们的目标是根据用户对医院信息系统属性表现的评估以及这些属性对用户满意度和工作效率结果的相对重要性,确定管理干预的优先事项。

程序

我们从154名护士用户那里收集了一系列代表系统质量、数据质量、信息质量和服务质量的属性数据。使用偏最小二乘法对他们的定量回答进行分析,随后进行重要性-绩效分析。使用主题分析对定性回答进行分析,以对定量结果进行三角验证和补充。

主要发现

确定了两个系统质量属性(响应速度和易学习性)、一个信息质量属性(详细程度)、一个服务质量属性(充分支持)以及三个数据质量属性(记录完整、准确且从不缺失)作为干预的高度优先事项。

结论

我们在医院信息系统评估中应用重要性-绩效分析具有独特性,并且我们已经说明了其在识别那些用户无法接受表现不佳情况、因此应作为干预高度优先事项的系统属性方面的效用。

相似文献

1
An importance-performance analysis of hospital information system attributes: A nurses' perspective.医院信息系统属性的重要性-绩效分析:护士视角
Int J Med Inform. 2016 Feb;86:82-90. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2015.10.010. Epub 2015 Nov 4.
2
Nurses' views on electronic medical records (EMR) in Turkey: an analysis according to use, quality and user satisfaction.土耳其护士对电子病历(EMR)的看法:根据使用情况、质量和用户满意度进行分析。
J Med Syst. 2012 Jun;36(3):1979-88. doi: 10.1007/s10916-011-9657-6. Epub 2011 Feb 8.
3
Use of and attitudes to a hospital information system by medical secretaries, nurses and physicians deprived of the paper-based medical record: a case report.被剥夺纸质病历的医疗秘书、护士和医生对医院信息系统的使用情况及态度:病例报告
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2004 Oct 16;4:18. doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-4-18.
4
Strategic Improvement for Quality and Satisfaction of Hospital Information Systems.医院信息系统质量和满意度的战略提升。
J Healthc Eng. 2018 Sep 12;2018:3689618. doi: 10.1155/2018/3689618. eCollection 2018.
5
Nurses' Satisfaction With Using Nursing Information Systems From Technology Acceptance Model and Information Systems Success Model Perspectives: A Reductionist Approach.从技术接受模型和信息系统成功模型角度看护士对使用护理信息系统的满意度:一种简化方法
Comput Inform Nurs. 2017 Feb;35(2):91-99. doi: 10.1097/CIN.0000000000000293.
6
Hospital Nurses' Work Activity in a Technology-Rich Environment: A Triangulated Quality Improvement Assessment.技术丰富环境下医院护士的工作活动:三角测量质量改进评估
J Nurs Care Qual. 2017 Jul/Sep;32(3):208-217. doi: 10.1097/NCQ.0000000000000237.
7
A study of user requests regarding the fully electronic health record system at Seoul National University Bundang Hospital: challenges for future electronic health record systems.一项关于首尔国立大学盆唐医院全电子健康记录系统用户请求的研究:对未来电子健康记录系统的挑战。
Int J Med Inform. 2013 May;82(5):387-97. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2012.08.004. Epub 2012 Sep 7.
8
Evaluation of system quality of hospital information system: a case study on nurses' experiences.医院信息系统的系统质量评估:以护士的体验为例
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2014;205:960-4.
9
Effects of Using Hospital Information Systems on Nurses' Individual Performance: A Study on Influential Factors.使用医院信息系统对护士个人绩效的影响:影响因素研究
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2020 Jun 23;271:161-167. doi: 10.3233/SHTI200092.
10
Nurses' perceptions and attitudes towards computerisation in a private hospital.护士对私立医院计算机化的看法和态度。
J Clin Nurs. 2012 Jun;21(11-12):1685-96. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2011.03905.x. Epub 2011 Nov 15.

引用本文的文献

1
Examining nurses' awareness level and compliance between defined and required access levels to core functionalities of hospital information system : an observational and survey study.考察护士对医院信息系统核心功能的规定访问级别与所需访问级别之间的认知水平及合规情况:一项观察性调查研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Dec 4;24(1):1538. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-12008-6.
2
Psychological resilience factors in intensive care nursing: a hybrid multi-criteria decision-making model.重症监护护理中的心理弹性因素:一种混合多标准决策模型。
BMC Nurs. 2024 Aug 15;23(1):566. doi: 10.1186/s12912-024-02229-9.
3
Research on collaborative development mechanism of multiple stakeholders in medical institutions based on rough set.
基于粗糙集的医疗机构多利益相关者协同发展机制研究
BMC Public Health. 2024 Feb 6;24(1):387. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-17813-6.
4
Health Data Sharing with the Goal of Value Creation; Trying to Develop a Framework Using Qualitative Content Analysis.以创造价值为目标的健康数据共享;尝试运用定性内容分析法构建一个框架。
Arch Acad Emerg Med. 2023 Nov 8;12(1):e6. doi: 10.22037/aaem.v12i1.2091. eCollection 2024.
5
Development of novel composite data quality scores to evaluate facility-level data quality in electronic data in Kenya: a nationwide retrospective cohort study.开发新型复合数据质量评分,以评估肯尼亚电子数据中的医疗机构数据质量:一项全国性回顾性队列研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Oct 23;23(1):1139. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-10133-2.
6
Identification of critical quality factors and critical satisfaction gaps in emergency training courses for new nurses by the multi-criteria network structure model.多准则网络结构模型在新护士急诊培训课程中关键质量因素和关键满意度差距的识别。
BMC Med Educ. 2023 May 17;23(1):346. doi: 10.1186/s12909-023-04330-0.
7
An artificial intelligence-based risk prediction model of myocardial infarction.基于人工智能的心肌梗死风险预测模型。
BMC Bioinformatics. 2022 Jun 7;23(1):217. doi: 10.1186/s12859-022-04761-4.
8
E-Health System Characteristics, Medical Performance, and Healthcare Quality at Jordan's Health Centers.约旦医疗中心的电子健康系统特征、医疗绩效与医疗质量
J Healthc Eng. 2021 Nov 26;2021:5887911. doi: 10.1155/2021/5887911. eCollection 2021.
9
Factors Influencing User Satisfaction with Information Systems: A Systematic Review.影响用户对信息系统满意度的因素:一项系统综述
Galen Med J. 2020 Jun 26;9:e1686. doi: 10.31661/gmj.v9i0.1686. eCollection 2020.
10
Important-performance analysis to conceptualize goal priorities in community dwelling stroke survivors.重要表现分析,以概念化社区居住的中风幸存者的目标重点。
Top Stroke Rehabil. 2022 May;29(4):310-320. doi: 10.1080/10749357.2021.1928838. Epub 2021 May 19.