Bravo G, Grob C
Department of Psychiatry and Human Behavior, University of California, Irvine.
J Psychoactive Drugs. 1989 Jan-Mar;21(1):123-8. doi: 10.1080/02791072.1989.10472149.
This article reviews the role of psychedelic drugs as potential tools for psychiatric research and practice. The decline in the utilization of these substances is linked to social reactions, which led to psychedelics being scheduled as controlled substances and consequently unavailable for human research. Three different paradigms for the use of psychedelics in psychiatry are reviewed: the psychotomimetic, the psycholytic, and the psychedelic approaches. The psychotomimetic paradigm, which viewed hallucinogens as agents for temporarily inducing psychoses, proved to be of limited value to the understanding and treatment of mental illness. The psycholytic approach, which was derived from the psychoanalytic paradigm, is a technique employing low doses of psychedelic drugs to reduce psychological defenses and to release unconscious information. The high-dose psychedelic paradigm frequently produced reports of mystical or spiritual experiences, thus recasting the psychiatrist as the modern-day shaman. This paradigm has alienated many in the psychiatric profession and has led to a reaction against the use of psychedelics in psychotherapy. If the opportunity should arise to pursue sanctioned clinical research with these unique psychoactive substances, however, it will be imperative to learn from the traditional models of shamanic healers in order to optimally assess true clinical efficacy and safety.
本文综述了迷幻药物作为精神病学研究和实践潜在工具的作用。这些物质使用的减少与社会反应有关,这导致迷幻剂被列为管制物质,因此无法用于人体研究。本文回顾了精神病学中使用迷幻剂的三种不同范式:拟精神病范式、精神溶解范式和迷幻范式。拟精神病范式将致幻剂视为暂时诱发精神病的药物,事实证明,该范式对理解和治疗精神疾病的价值有限。精神溶解范式源自精神分析范式,是一种使用低剂量迷幻药物来减少心理防御并释放潜意识信息的技术。高剂量迷幻范式经常产生神秘或精神体验的报告,从而将精神科医生重塑为现代萨满巫师。这种范式疏远了许多精神病学专业人士,并导致了对迷幻剂在心理治疗中使用的抵制。然而,如果有机会对这些独特的精神活性物质进行经批准的临床研究,那么借鉴传统萨满巫师治疗师的模式以最佳评估真正的临床疗效和安全性将势在必行。