• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经皮胆囊造瘘术的结局及最终胆囊切除术的预测因素。

Outcomes of percutaneous cholecystostomy and predictors of eventual cholecystectomy.

作者信息

Yeo Charleen Shan Wen, Tay Vivyan Wei Yen, Low Jee Keem, Woon Winston Wei Liang, Punamiya Sundeep J, Shelat Vishal G

机构信息

Department of General Surgery, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, 11 Jalan Tan Tock Seng, Singapore 308433.

Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore.

出版信息

J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2016 Jan;23(1):65-73. doi: 10.1002/jhbp.304. Epub 2015 Dec 10.

DOI:10.1002/jhbp.304
PMID:26580708
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Percutaneous cholecystostomy (PC) is an established treatment for high surgical risk patients with acute cholecystitis. This paper studies factors predictive of mortality and eventual cholecystectomy.

METHODS

A retrospective review of all patients who underwent PC from March 2005 to March 2015 was performed. Patient demographics, clinical features, comorbidity profile, grade of cholecystitis, interval between cholecystitis diagnosis and PC, and method of PC were studied. Length of stay, complications, readmission rate, mortality and eventual cholecystectomy were studied. For patients with eventual cholecystectomy, operative data and perioperative outcomes were studied.

RESULTS

One hundred and three patients with median age of 80 years (range 43-105) underwent PC. Median interval to PC was 2 days (range 0-15). 9.7% of patients had complications. Median length of stay was 19 days (range 3-206). 41% underwent eventual cholecystectomy. 30-day mortality rate was 10.7%. Higher APACHE II scores (P = 0.004), higher Charlson comorbidity index (CCI) (P = 0.009), and longer interval from diagnosis to PC (P = 0.037) were associated with in-hospital mortality. Younger age (P = 0.015), lower APACHE II scores (P = 0.043) and lower CCI (P = 0.002) were associated with eventual cholecystectomy.

CONCLUSION

Percutaneous cholecystostomy is safe and effective in treatment of acute cholecystitis. Prompt PC improves survival in high risk surgical patients. Comorbidity severity is associated with mortality. Patients with lesser comorbidity are likely to receive eventual cholecystectomy.

摘要

背景

经皮胆囊造瘘术(PC)是治疗急性胆囊炎手术风险高的患者的一种既定疗法。本文研究了预测死亡率和最终胆囊切除术的因素。

方法

对2005年3月至2015年3月期间接受PC的所有患者进行回顾性研究。研究了患者的人口统计学特征、临床特征、合并症情况、胆囊炎分级、胆囊炎诊断与PC之间的间隔时间以及PC方法。研究了住院时间、并发症、再入院率、死亡率和最终胆囊切除术。对于最终接受胆囊切除术的患者,研究了手术数据和围手术期结果。

结果

103例患者接受了PC,中位年龄为80岁(范围43 - 105岁)。至PC的中位间隔时间为2天(范围0 - 15天)。9.7%的患者出现并发症。中位住院时间为19天(范围3 - 206天)。41%的患者最终接受了胆囊切除术。30天死亡率为10.7%。较高的急性生理与慢性健康状况评分系统II(APACHE II)评分(P = 0.004)、较高的查尔森合并症指数(CCI)(P = 0.009)以及从诊断到PC的间隔时间较长(P = 0.037)与院内死亡率相关。年龄较小(P = 0.015)、较低的APACHE II评分(P = 0.043)和较低的CCI(P = 0.002)与最终胆囊切除术相关。

结论

经皮胆囊造瘘术治疗急性胆囊炎安全有效。及时进行PC可提高高风险手术患者的生存率。合并症严重程度与死亡率相关。合并症较少的患者可能最终接受胆囊切除术。

相似文献

1
Outcomes of percutaneous cholecystostomy and predictors of eventual cholecystectomy.经皮胆囊造瘘术的结局及最终胆囊切除术的预测因素。
J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2016 Jan;23(1):65-73. doi: 10.1002/jhbp.304. Epub 2015 Dec 10.
2
Percutaneous Cholecystostomy in Acute Cholecystitis-Predictors of Recurrence and Interval Cholecystectomy.急性胆囊炎经皮胆囊造瘘术——复发及择期胆囊切除术的预测因素
J Surg Res. 2018 Dec;232:539-546. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2018.06.051. Epub 2018 Aug 3.
3
Emergent cholecystostomy is superior to open cholecystectomy in extremely ill patients with acalculous cholecystitis: a large multicenter outcome study.在患有非结石性胆囊炎的极重症患者中,紧急胆囊造口术优于开腹胆囊切除术:一项大型多中心结局研究。
Am J Surg. 2013 Dec;206(6):935-40; discussion 940-1. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2013.08.019. Epub 2013 Oct 8.
4
Comparison of cholecystectomy and percutaneous cholecystostomy in acute cholecystitis: results of a retrospective study.胆囊切除术与经皮胆囊造口术治疗急性胆囊炎的比较:一项回顾性研究的结果。
Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2017 Oct;21(20):4668-4674.
5
Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Versus Percutaneous Cholecystostomy: Suitability of APACHE-II Score, ASA Grade, and Tokyo Guidelines 18 Grade as Predictors of Outcome in Patients With Acute Cholecystitis.腹腔镜胆囊切除术与经皮胆囊造口术:APACHE-II 评分、ASA 分级和东京指南 18 分级作为急性胆囊炎患者结局预测因子的适用性。
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2022 Jun 1;32(3):342-349. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0000000000001048.
6
Index cholecystectomy in grade II and III acute calculous cholecystitis is feasible and safe.二级和三级急性结石性胆囊炎的择期胆囊切除术是可行且安全的。
ANZ J Surg. 2015 Nov;85(11):854-9. doi: 10.1111/ans.12986. Epub 2015 Feb 2.
7
Cholecystostomy: a review of recent experience.胆囊造口术:近期经验回顾
Aust N Z J Surg. 1999 Dec;69(12):837-40. doi: 10.1046/j.1440-1622.1999.01712.x.
8
Perioperative outcomes of delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute calculous cholecystitis with and without percutaneous cholecystostomy.有或无经皮胆囊造瘘术的急性结石性胆囊炎延迟腹腔镜胆囊切除术的围手术期结局
Surgery. 2015 Sep;158(3):728-35. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2015.05.005. Epub 2015 Jun 18.
9
Healthcare Disparities in the Management of Acute Cholecystitis: Impact of Race, Gender, and Socioeconomic Factors on Cholecystectomy vs Percutaneous Cholecystostomy.急性胆囊炎管理中的医疗保健差异:种族、性别和社会经济因素对胆囊切除术与经皮胆囊造口术的影响。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2021 Apr;25(4):880-886. doi: 10.1007/s11605-021-04959-6. Epub 2021 Feb 24.
10
Percutaneous cholecystostomy without interval cholecystectomy as definitive treatment of acute cholecystitis in elderly and critically ill patients.经皮胆囊造瘘术,不进行间隔期胆囊切除术,作为老年和重症患者急性胆囊炎的确定性治疗方法。
South Med J. 2008 Jun;101(6):586-90. doi: 10.1097/SMJ.0b013e3181757b77.

引用本文的文献

1
Indications and clinical outcomes of percutaneous cholecystostomies in acute cholecystitis: a study from Qatar.急性胆囊炎经皮胆囊造瘘术的适应症及临床结局:一项来自卡塔尔的研究。
BMC Surg. 2025 Mar 15;25(1):100. doi: 10.1186/s12893-025-02765-4.
2
Percutaneous cholecystostomy tube placement as a bridge to cholecystectomy for grade III acute cholecystitis: A national analysis.经皮胆囊造瘘管置入术作为Ⅲ级急性胆囊炎胆囊切除术的桥梁:一项全国性分析。
Surg Open Sci. 2024 Jan 14;18:6-10. doi: 10.1016/j.sopen.2024.01.006. eCollection 2024 Mar.
3
Assessment of Gallbladder Drainage Methods in the Treatment of Acute Cholecystitis: A Literature Review.
急性胆囊炎治疗中胆囊引流方法的评估:文献综述
Medicina (Kaunas). 2023 Dec 20;60(1):5. doi: 10.3390/medicina60010005.
4
Outcome Predictors of Percutaneous Cholecystostomy As Definitive Versus Bridging Treatment for Acute Cholecystitis.经皮胆囊造瘘术作为急性胆囊炎确定性治疗与过渡性治疗的结局预测因素
Cureus. 2023 Dec 5;15(12):e49962. doi: 10.7759/cureus.49962. eCollection 2023 Dec.
5
Diagnostic and Management of Emphysematous Hepatitis with Emphasis on Biopathology.气肿性肝炎的诊断与管理,重点关注生物病理学
Microorganisms. 2023 Aug 23;11(9):2137. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms11092137.
6
Should Procalcitonin Be Included in Acute Cholecystitis Guidelines? A Systematic Review.降钙素原是否应纳入急性胆囊炎指南?系统评价。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2023 Apr 20;59(4):805. doi: 10.3390/medicina59040805.
7
Factors affecting interval cholecystectomy and mortality in percutaneous cholecystostomy patients.影响经皮胆囊造瘘术患者间隔性胆囊切除术和死亡率的因素。
Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2022 Dec;28(12):1696-1700. doi: 10.14744/tjtes.2022.84294.
8
Cholecystectomy for asymptomatic gallstones: Markov decision tree analysis.无症状胆结石的胆囊切除术:马尔可夫决策树分析
World J Clin Cases. 2022 Oct 16;10(29):10399-10412. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v10.i29.10399.
9
Validation of TG07 and TG13/TG18 criteria for acute cholangitis and predictors of in-hospital mortality in patients over 80 years old.80岁以上患者急性胆管炎TG07和TG13/TG18标准的验证及院内死亡预测因素
Clin Exp Hepatol. 2021 Dec;7(4):396-405. doi: 10.5114/ceh.2021.110996. Epub 2021 Nov 29.
10
Choledochoscopy: An update.胆道镜检查:最新进展
World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2021 Dec 16;13(12):571-592. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v13.i12.571.