Heikkilä Maria, Mutanen Marko, Wahlberg Niklas, Sihvonen Pasi, Kaila Lauri
Finnish Museum of Natural History, Zoology Unit, University of Helsinki, PO Box 17, Helsinki, 00014, Finland.
Department of Genetics and Physiology, University of Oulu, PO Box 3000, Oulu, 90014, Finland.
BMC Evol Biol. 2015 Nov 21;15:260. doi: 10.1186/s12862-015-0520-0.
Ditrysia comprise close to 99 % of all butterflies and moths. The evolutionary relationships among the ditrysian superfamilies have received considerable attention in phylogenetic studies based on DNA and transcriptomic data, but the deepest divergences remain for large parts unresolved or contradictory. To obtain complementary insight into the evolutionary history of the clade, and to test previous hypotheses on the subdivision of Ditrysia based on morphology, we examine the morphology of larvae, pupae and adult males and females of 318 taxa representing nearly all ditrysian superfamilies and families. We present the most comprehensive morphological dataset on Ditrysia to date, consisting of over 500 morphological characters. The data are analyzed alone and combined with sequence data (one mitochondrial and seven nuclear protein-coding gene regions, sequenced from 422 taxa). The full dataset consists of 473 exemplar species. Analyses are performed using maximum likelihood methods, and parsimony methods for the morphological dataset. We explore whether combining morphological data and DNA-data can stabilize taxa that are unstable in phylogenetic studies based on genetic data only.
Morphological characters are found phylogenetically informative in resolving apical nodes (superfamilies and families), but characters serving as evidence of relatedness of larger assemblages are few. Results include the recovery of a monophyletic Tineoidea, Sesioidea and Cossoidea, and a stable position for some unstable taxa (e.g. Epipyropidae, Cyclotornidae, Urodoidea + Schreckensteinioidea). Several such taxa, however, remain unstable even though morphological characters indicate a position in the tree (e.g. Immidae). Evidence supporting affinities between clades are suggested, e.g. a novel larval synapomorphy for Tineidae. We also propose the synonymy of Tineodidae with Alucitidae, syn. nov.
The large morphological dataset provides information on the diversity and distribution of morphological traits in Ditrysia, and can be used in future research on the evolution of these traits, in identification keys and in identification of fossil Lepidoptera. The "backbone" of the phylogeny for Ditrysia remains largely unresolved. As previously proposed as an explanation for the scarcity of molecular signal in resolving the deeper nodes, this may be due to the rapid radiation of Ditrysia in the Cretaceous.
双孔亚目昆虫约占所有蝴蝶和蛾类的99%。基于DNA和转录组数据的系统发育研究中,双孔亚目总科之间的进化关系受到了广泛关注,但大部分最深层次的分歧仍未解决或存在矛盾。为了深入了解该类群的进化历史,并检验先前基于形态学对双孔亚目的分类假说,我们研究了代表几乎所有双孔亚目总科和科的318个分类单元的幼虫、蛹以及成虫雄性和雌性的形态。我们展示了迄今为止关于双孔亚目的最全面的形态学数据集,包含500多个形态特征。这些数据单独进行分析,并与序列数据(一个线粒体和七个核蛋白编码基因区域,从422个分类单元测序获得)相结合。完整的数据集由473个模式物种组成。分析采用最大似然法以及针对形态学数据集的简约法。我们探究将形态学数据和DNA数据相结合是否能稳定仅基于遗传数据的系统发育研究中不稳定的分类单元。
在解决顶端节点(总科和科)时发现形态特征具有系统发育信息,但能作为较大类群亲缘关系证据的特征较少。结果包括恢复了单系的麦蛾总科、透翅蛾总科和木蠹蛾总科,以及一些不稳定分类单元(如蛾蚋科、环蛾科、巢蛾总科 + 裂蛾总科)的稳定位置。然而,即使形态特征表明了其在系统发育树中的位置,仍有几个这样的分类单元不稳定(如蚁巢蛾科)。有证据表明了类群之间的亲缘关系,例如麦蛾科一种新的幼虫共衍征。我们还提议将异麦蛾科与多翼蛾科同义,新组合。
庞大的形态学数据集提供了关于双孔亚目形态特征的多样性和分布的信息,可用于未来这些特征进化、鉴定检索表以及化石鳞翅目鉴定的研究。双孔亚目的系统发育“主干”在很大程度上仍未解决。正如之前所提出的,作为在解决更深层次节点时分子信号稀缺的一种解释,这可能是由于双孔亚目在白垩纪的快速辐射。