This Cochrane Review is closed: deciding what constitutes enough research and where next for pulmonary rehabilitation in COPD.
作者信息
Lacasse Yves, Cates Christopher J, McCarthy Bernard, Welsh Emma J
机构信息
Québec Heart and Lung Institute, Québec, Canada.
出版信息
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Nov 18;2015(11):ED000107. doi: 10.1002/14651858.ED000107.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
This Cochrane Review is closed: deciding what constitutes enough research and where next for pulmonary rehabilitation in COPD.本Cochrane系统评价已结束：确定慢性阻塞性肺疾病（COPD）肺康复的充分研究标准及后续方向。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Nov 18;2015(11):ED000107. doi: 10.1002/14651858.ED000107.
2
Virtual reality as an adjunct to pulmonary rehabilitation of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis.虚拟现实作为慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者肺康复的辅助手段：系统评价和荟萃分析方案。
BMJ Open. 2023 Dec 9;13(12):e074688. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-074688.
3
Traditional Chinese exercise (TCE) on pulmonary rehabilitation in patients with stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: Protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis.传统中式运动对稳定期慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者肺康复的作用：一项系统评价与网状Meta分析方案
Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 Jul;98(27):e16299. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000016299.
4
Home-based versus outpatient pulmonary rehabilitation program for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis.基于家庭和门诊的慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者肺康复计划：系统评价和荟萃分析方案。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2021 May 28;100(21):e26099. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000026099.
5
Managing COPD using pulmonary rehabilitation: a literature review.使用肺康复治疗慢性阻塞性肺疾病：一项文献综述。
Nurs Stand. 2015 Dec 2;30(14):38-43. doi: 10.7748/ns.30.14.38.s44.
6
Effectiveness of pulmonary rehabilitation in elderly patients with COPD: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.肺康复对老年慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者的有效性：一项随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析
Int J Nurs Pract. 2019 Oct;25(5):e12745. doi: 10.1111/ijn.12745. Epub 2019 Jul 2.
7
Efficacy of pulmonary rehabilitation in improving the quality of life for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: Evidence based on nineteen randomized controlled trials.肺康复对改善慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者生活质量的疗效：基于十九项随机对照试验的证据。
Int J Surg. 2020 Jan;73:78-86. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2019.11.033. Epub 2019 Dec 13.
8
Epidemiology of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in the global HIV-infected population: a systematic review and meta-analysis protocol.全球感染艾滋病毒人群中慢性阻塞性肺疾病的流行病学：一项系统评价和荟萃分析方案
Syst Rev. 2017 Mar 29;6(1):68. doi: 10.1186/s13643-017-0467-x.
9
Pulmonary rehabilitation for people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: A protocol for an overview of Cochrane reviews.慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者的肺康复：Cochrane系统评价概述方案
Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 Sep;98(38):e17129. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000017129.
10
Pulmonary rehabilitation: an integral part of the long-term management of COPD.肺康复：慢性阻塞性肺疾病长期管理的重要组成部分。
Swiss Med Wkly. 2004 Oct 16;134(41-42):601-5. doi: 10.4414/smw.2004.10716.
引用本文的文献
1
Barriers and enablers to medicine-taking behaviours in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a qualitative interview study.慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者服药行为的障碍与促进因素：一项定性访谈研究
Int J Clin Pharm. 2025 Jun;47(3):775-783. doi: 10.1007/s11096-025-01872-9. Epub 2025 Feb 5.
2
Pulmonary Rehabilitation Once a Week for One Year in a Patient With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者每周一次肺康复治疗，为期一年。
Cureus. 2024 Jul 7;16(7):e64049. doi: 10.7759/cureus.64049. eCollection 2024 Jul.
3
The Role of Illness Perceptions in Dyspnoea-Related Fear in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.疾病认知在慢性阻塞性肺疾病呼吸困难相关恐惧中的作用
J Clin Med. 2023 Dec 29;13(1):200. doi: 10.3390/jcm13010200.
4
From illness management to quality of life: rethinking consumer health informatics opportunities for progressive, potentially fatal illnesses.从疾病管理到生活质量：重新思考渐进性、潜在致命疾病的消费者健康信息学机遇。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2024 Feb 16;31(3):674-691. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocad234.
5
Pulmonary Telerehabilitation for People With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease in Brazil: A Mixed-Methods Feasibility Study.巴西慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者的远程肺康复：一项混合方法可行性研究。
Int J Telerehabil. 2023 May 11;15(1):e6555. doi: 10.5195/ijt.2023.6555. eCollection 2023.
6
Pulmonary rehabilitation and physical interventions.肺康复和物理干预。
Eur Respir Rev. 2023 Jun 7;32(168). doi: 10.1183/16000617.0222-2022. Print 2023 Jun 30.
7
Breathing Control Exercises Delivered in a Group Setting for Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Randomized Controlled Trial.针对慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者的团体呼吸控制训练：一项随机对照试验
Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Mar 17;11(6):877. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11060877.
8
Dyspnea: a map of Cochrane evidence relevant to rehabilitation for people with post COVID-19 condition.呼吸困难：与新冠后康复相关的考科蓝证据图谱。
Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2022 Dec;58(6):864-869. doi: 10.23736/S1973-9087.22.07805-4. Epub 2022 Dec 13.
9
Participatory methods in a digital setting: experiences from the co-creation of an eHealth tool for people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.参与式方法在数字环境中的应用：共同创建用于慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者的电子健康工具的经验。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2022 Mar 18;22(1):68. doi: 10.1186/s12911-022-01806-9.
10
Pulmonary rehabilitation: Too many ifs and buts.肺康复：太多的“如果”和“但是”。
Lung India. 2021 May-Jun;38(3):209-210. doi: 10.4103/lungindia.lungindia_7_21.
本文引用的文献
1
Small studies are more heterogeneous than large ones: a meta-meta-analysis.小样本研究比大样本研究更具异质性：一项元分析研究。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2015 Aug;68(8):860-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2015.03.017. Epub 2015 Apr 2.
2
Pulmonary rehabilitation for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.慢性阻塞性肺疾病的肺康复治疗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Feb 23;2015(2):CD003793. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003793.pub3.
3
Heterogeneity of pulmonary rehabilitation: like apples and oranges - both healthy fruit.肺康复的异质性：如苹果与橙子——皆是健康水果。
Eur Respir J. 2014 May;43(5):1223-6. doi: 10.1183/09031936.00021114.
4
A multicomponent decision tool for prioritising the updating of systematic reviews.一种用于确定系统评价更新优先级的多成分决策工具。
BMJ. 2013 Dec 13;347:f7191. doi: 10.1136/bmj.f7191.
5
A surveillance system to assess the need for updating systematic reviews.一个用于评估更新系统评价必要性的监测系统。
Syst Rev. 2013 Nov 14;2:104. doi: 10.1186/2046-4053-2-104.
6
Identifying, documenting, and examining heterogeneity in systematic reviews of complex interventions.系统评价复杂干预措施中的异质性识别、记录和检查。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2013 Nov;66(11):1244-50. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2013.06.013. Epub 2013 Aug 13.
7
Two methods provide similar signals for the need to update systematic reviews.两种方法为系统评价更新提供了相似的信号。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2012 Jun;65(6):660-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2011.12.004. Epub 2012 Mar 29.
8
GRADE guidelines: 7. Rating the quality of evidence--inconsistency.GRADE 指南：7. 评估证据质量——不一致性。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2011 Dec;64(12):1294-302. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2011.03.017. Epub 2011 Jul 31.
9
GRADE guidelines: 3. Rating the quality of evidence.GRADE 指南：3. 评估证据质量。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2011 Apr;64(4):401-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.07.015. Epub 2011 Jan 5.
10
GRADE guidelines: 1. Introduction-GRADE evidence profiles and summary of findings tables.GRADE 指南：1. 简介-GRADE 证据概况和发现摘要表。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2011 Apr;64(4):383-94. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.04.026. Epub 2010 Dec 31.
Zotero 插件