Baldassarri Delia
AJS. 2015 Sep;121(2):355-95. doi: 10.1086/682418.
Repeated interaction and social networks are commonly considered viable solutions to collective action problems. This article identifies and systematically measures four general mechanisms--that is, generalized altruism, group solidarity, reciprocity, and the threat of sanctioning--and tests which of them brings about cooperation in the context of Ugandan producer organizations. Using an innovative methodological framework that combines "lab-in-the-field" experiments with survey interviews and complete social networks data, the article goes beyond the assessment of a relationship between social networks and collective outcomes to study the mechanisms that favor cooperative behavior. The article first establishes a positive relationship between position in the network structure and propensity to cooperate in the producer organization and then uses farmers' behavior in dictator and public goods games to test different mechanisms that may account for such a relationship. Results show that cooperation is induced by patterns of reciprocity that emerge through repeated interaction rather than other-regarding preferences like altruism or group solidarity.
重复互动和社会网络通常被认为是解决集体行动问题的可行方案。本文识别并系统衡量了四种一般机制,即广义利他主义、群体团结、互惠互利以及制裁威胁,并测试了在乌干达生产者组织的背景下,这些机制中哪一种能促成合作。通过将“实地实验室”实验与调查访谈及完整的社会网络数据相结合的创新方法框架,本文超越了对社会网络与集体成果之间关系的评估,转而研究有利于合作行为的机制。本文首先确立了网络结构中的位置与生产者组织中的合作倾向之间的正向关系,然后利用农民在独裁者博弈和公共物品博弈中的行为来测试可能解释这种关系的不同机制。结果表明,合作是由重复互动产生的互惠模式所引发的,而非利他主义或群体团结等他人导向型偏好。