Ahn Seong Joon, Park Kyu Hyung, Ryoo Na-Kyung, Hong Jeong-Ho, Jung Cheolkyu, Yoon Chang-Hwan, Han Moon-Ku, Woo Se Joon
Department of Ophthalmology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea.
Department of Neurology, Keimyung University Dongsan Medical Center, Daegu, Korea.
PLoS One. 2015 Nov 23;10(11):e0142852. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0142852. eCollection 2015.
To investigate the incidence and risk factors of the no-reflow phenomenon in central retinal artery occlusion (CRAO) patients and to determine its effects on visual and anatomic outcomes.
In 102 eyes with CRAO in which arterial recanalization was obtained within 1 week from baseline, fluorescein angiography images obtained at baseline and 1 week were retrospectively reviewed. The no-reflow phenomenon in the retina was defined as macular capillary nonperfusion following arterial recanalization on fluorescein angiographs. We investigated the incidence and risk factors for the no-reflow phenomenon and compared the anatomical and visual outcomes between eyes with and without the phenomenon.
Among the 102 CRAO eyes with arterial recanalization, 39 exhibited the no-reflow phenomenon, resulting in an incidence of 38.2%. The incidence among the eyes with treatment-induced and spontaneous recanalization was 43.4% and 15.8%, respectively, and it increased with the CRAO stage. CRAO stage and increased central macular thickness were risk factors for the phenomenon, with an odds ratio of 4.47 [95% confidence interval (CI), 1.19-16.8; P = 0.027] and 1.69 (95% CI, 1.12-2.55; P = 0.012) per 100-μm increase, respectively. The visual outcome was significantly poorer and retinal atrophy and photoreceptor disruption was greater in eyes with the no-reflow phenomenon than in those without.
The no-reflow phenomenon may occur after arterial recanalization in approximately one-third of CRAO patients and can affect anatomical and visual outcomes. This phenomenon may provide an additional explanation regarding the permanent retinal damage and vision loss in eyes with CRAO.
探讨视网膜中央动脉阻塞(CRAO)患者无再流现象的发生率及危险因素,并确定其对视力和解剖学预后的影响。
对102例在基线后1周内实现动脉再通的CRAO患眼进行回顾性研究,分析其基线及1周时的荧光素血管造影图像。视网膜无再流现象定义为荧光素血管造影显示动脉再通后黄斑区毛细血管无灌注。我们研究了无再流现象的发生率及危险因素,并比较了有无该现象患眼的解剖学和视力预后。
在102例实现动脉再通的CRAO患眼中,39例出现无再流现象,发生率为38.2%。治疗诱导再通和自发再通患眼中的发生率分别为43.4%和15.8%,且随着CRAO分期增加而升高。CRAO分期及中心黄斑厚度增加是该现象的危险因素,每增加100μm,优势比分别为4.47[95%置信区间(CI),1.19 - 16.8;P = 0.027]和1.69(95%CI,1.12 - 2.55;P = 0.012)。有无无再流现象的患眼相比,前者视力预后显著更差,视网膜萎缩和光感受器破坏更严重。
约三分之一的CRAO患者在动脉再通后可能出现无再流现象,且会影响解剖学和视力预后。该现象可能为CRAO患眼永久性视网膜损伤和视力丧失提供额外解释。