Bruning Andrea H L, Thomas Xiomara V, van der Linden Lonneke, Wildenbeest Joanne G, Minnaar René P, Jansen Rogier R, de Jong Menno D, Sterk Peter J, van der Schee Marc P, Wolthers Katja C, Pajkrt Dasja
Department of Pediatric Infectious Diseases, Emma Children's Hospital, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Department of Medical Microbiology, Laboratory of Clinical Virology, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
J Clin Virol. 2015 Dec;73:120-126. doi: 10.1016/j.jcv.2015.10.024. Epub 2015 Nov 10.
Several studies have been published regarding the epidemiology and clinical significance of the different rhinovirus (RV) species (-A, -B and -C). However, data on RV types and the associations with clinical outcome in young children are limited. Here, we investigated the clinical, virological and epidemiological characteristics of RV infections in young children with mild or asymptomatic infection (non-hospitalised children) and in symptomatic young children admitted to the hospital.
The aim of this study was to evaluate associations between different characteristics of RV infections and clinical outcome in young children.
RV-infected children were retrospectively selected from a Dutch birth cohort (EUROPA-study) and from hospitalised children admitted to the hospital because of respiratory symptoms. In total 120 RV-typed samples could be selected from 65 non-hospitalised and 49 hospitalised children between November 2009 and December 2012.
RV-A was the predominant species in both study populations, followed closely by RV-C. RV-B was observed only sporadically. The distribution of the RV species was comparable in non-hospitalised and hospitalised children. In children with respiratory distress who required ICU-admission the distribution of RV species did not differ significantly from the non-hospitalised children. No predominant RV type was present in non-hospitalised nor hospitalised children. However, hospitalised children were younger, had more often an underlying illness, a higher RV load and more frequently a bacterial co-infection.
Clinical outcome of RV infected young children was not related to RV species or types, but may more likely be influenced by multiple (host-specific) factors.
关于不同鼻病毒(RV)种类(-A、-B和-C)的流行病学及临床意义,已有多项研究发表。然而,关于RV类型以及与幼儿临床结局的关联的数据有限。在此,我们调查了轻度或无症状感染的幼儿(非住院儿童)以及入院的有症状幼儿中RV感染的临床、病毒学和流行病学特征。
本研究旨在评估RV感染的不同特征与幼儿临床结局之间的关联。
从荷兰出生队列(EUROPA研究)以及因呼吸道症状入院的住院儿童中回顾性选取RV感染儿童。在2009年11月至2012年12月期间,共从65名非住院儿童和49名住院儿童中选取了120份已分型的RV样本。
RV-A是两个研究人群中的主要种类,其次是RV-C。RV-B仅偶尔观察到。RV种类在非住院儿童和住院儿童中的分布相当。在需要入住重症监护病房的呼吸窘迫儿童中,RV种类的分布与非住院儿童无显著差异。非住院儿童和住院儿童中均无优势RV型。然而,住院儿童年龄更小,更常有基础疾病,RV载量更高,且更频繁地合并细菌感染。
RV感染幼儿的临床结局与RV种类或类型无关,但更可能受多种(宿主特异性)因素影响。