Zhang Long, Dong Yi, Ji Yifu, Tao Rui, Chen Xuequan, Ye Jianguo, Zhang Lei, Yu Fengqiong, Zhu Chunyan, Wang Kai
Department of Neurology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China.
Laboratory of Neuropsychology, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China.
Sci Rep. 2015 Nov 25;5:17312. doi: 10.1038/srep17312.
This study aimed to investigate whether deficits in decision making were potential endophenotype markers for OCD considering different phases of the disease. Fifty-seven non-medicated OCD patients (nmOCD), 77 medicated OCD patients (mOCD), 48 remitted patients with OCD (rOCD) and 115 healthy controls were assessed with the Iowa Gambling Task (IGT), which measured decision making under ambiguity, and the Game of Dice Task (GDT), which measured decision making under risk. While the three patients groups showed impaired performance on the IGT compared with healthy controls, all patients showed intact performance on the GDT. Furthermore, the rOCD patients showed a preference for deck B, indicating that they showed more sensitivity to the frequency of loss than to the magnitude of loss, whereas the mOCD patients showed a preference for deck A, indicating that they had more sensitivity to the magnitude of loss than to the frequency of loss. These data suggested that OCD patients had trait-related impairments in decision making under ambiguity but not under risk, and that dissociation of decision making under ambiguity and under risk is an appropriate potential neurocognitive endophenotype for OCD. The subtle but meaningful differences in decision making performance between the OCD groups require further study.
本研究旨在探讨考虑到疾病的不同阶段,决策缺陷是否为强迫症的潜在内表型标志物。对57名未用药的强迫症患者(nmOCD)、77名正在用药的强迫症患者(mOCD)、48名缓解期强迫症患者(rOCD)和115名健康对照者进行了爱荷华赌博任务(IGT)评估,该任务测量在模糊情境下的决策,以及骰子游戏任务(GDT),该任务测量在风险情境下的决策。虽然与健康对照者相比,三组患者在IGT上表现受损,但所有患者在GDT上表现正常。此外,缓解期强迫症患者表现出对B组牌的偏好,表明他们对损失频率的敏感性高于对损失幅度的敏感性,而正在用药的强迫症患者表现出对A组牌的偏好,表明他们对损失幅度的敏感性高于对损失频率的敏感性。这些数据表明,强迫症患者在模糊情境下而非风险情境下存在与特质相关的决策受损,并且模糊情境下和风险情境下决策的分离是强迫症合适的潜在神经认知内表型。强迫症组之间决策表现的细微但有意义的差异需要进一步研究。