Pushkarskaya Helen, Tolin David, Ruderman Lital, Kirshenbaum Ariel, Kelly J MacLaren, Pittenger Christopher, Levy Ifat
Section of Comparative Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06510, USA.
Department of Psychiatry, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06510, USA; Anxiety Disorders Center, Institute of Living, Hartford Hospital, Hartford, CT 06114, USA.
J Psychiatr Res. 2015 Oct;69:166-73. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2015.08.011. Epub 2015 Aug 12.
Obsessive compulsive disorder (OCD) produces profound morbidity. Difficulties with decision-making and intolerance of uncertainty are prominent clinical features in many patients. The nature and etiology of these deficits are poorly understood. We used a well-validated choice task, grounded in behavioral economic theory, to investigate differences in valuation and value-based choice during decision making under uncertainty in 20 unmedicated participants with OCD and 20 matched healthy controls. Participants' choices were used to assess individual decision-making characteristics. OCD participants did not differ from healthy controls in how they valued uncertain options when outcome probabilities were known (risk) but were more likely than healthy controls to avoid uncertain options when these probabilities were imprecisely specified (ambiguity). Compared to healthy controls, individuals with OCD were less consistent in their choices and less able to identify options that should be clearly preferable. These abnormalities correlated with symptom severity. These results suggest that value-based choices during decision-making are abnormal in OCD. Individuals with OCD show elevated intolerance of uncertainty, but only when outcome probabilities are themselves uncertain. Future research focused on the neural valuation network, which is implicated in value-based computations, may provide new neurocognitive insights into the pathophysiology of OCD. Deficits in decision-making processes may represent a target for therapeutic intervention.
强迫症(OCD)会导致严重的发病情况。决策困难和对不确定性的不耐受是许多患者的突出临床特征。这些缺陷的性质和病因尚不清楚。我们使用了一个基于行为经济学理论且经过充分验证的选择任务,来研究20名未服药的强迫症患者和20名匹配的健康对照在不确定性决策过程中估值和基于价值的选择的差异。参与者的选择被用于评估个体的决策特征。在已知结果概率(风险)时,强迫症患者在对不确定选项的估值方式上与健康对照没有差异,但在这些概率不精确指定(模糊性)时,他们比健康对照更有可能避免不确定选项。与健康对照相比,强迫症患者的选择更不一致,并且更难以识别明显更优的选项。这些异常与症状严重程度相关。这些结果表明,强迫症患者在决策过程中基于价值的选择是异常的。强迫症患者表现出对不确定性的不耐受增加,但仅在结果概率本身不确定时如此。未来针对涉及基于价值计算的神经估值网络的研究,可能会为强迫症的病理生理学提供新的神经认知见解。决策过程中的缺陷可能代表了治疗干预的一个靶点。