• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

氨曲南与妥布霉素治疗急性肾盂肾炎的比较研究

[Aztreonam versus tobramycin in acute pyelonephritis. A comparative study].

作者信息

Gallego J, Jiménez Cruz J F, Gobernado M, Llopis B, Vidal J, Server G, Ruiz J L, David Vera C

出版信息

Arch Esp Urol. 1989 Mar;42(2):116-9.

PMID:2660754
Abstract

We performed a comparative study between the monobactam antibiotic aztreonam and the aminoglycoside tobramycin in patients diagnosed as having acute pyelonephritis. The respective doses were 1 gr. IM daily for 7 days, and 100 mgr. IM q 12 h for the same period of time. Clinically, 100% of uncomplicated acute pyelonephritis and 87.5% of complicated infections cured with aztreonam. Tobramycin achieved an 80% cure rate for both types of infections. Microbiologically aztreonam was effective in all uncomplicated acute pyelonephritis, and in 69.56% of the complicated cases (overall microbiological cure rate = 78.7%). The therapeutic failures were ascribable to infections from S. faecalis, an organism naturally resistant to aztreonam. Thus, the microbiological cure rate was 84.2% in complicated pyelonephritis from organisms sensitive to this antimicrobial. The microbiological cure rate for tobramycin was 70% in acute uncomplicated, and 80% in complicated infections. We observed a good clinical and biological tolerance to both antimicrobials. No side effects were observed. Serum and blood biochemical analyses, and coagulation tests revealed no changes.

摘要

我们对被诊断为急性肾盂肾炎的患者进行了单环β-内酰胺类抗生素氨曲南和氨基糖苷类抗生素妥布霉素的对比研究。各自的剂量为每天1克,肌内注射,共7天,以及每12小时100毫克,肌内注射,疗程相同。临床上,100%的非复杂性急性肾盂肾炎和87.5%的复杂性感染用氨曲南治愈。妥布霉素对两种类型感染的治愈率为80%。在微生物学方面,氨曲南对所有非复杂性急性肾盂肾炎有效,对69.56%的复杂性病例有效(总体微生物学治愈率 = 78.7%)。治疗失败归因于粪肠球菌感染,该菌对氨曲南天然耐药。因此,对于对这种抗菌药物敏感的微生物引起的复杂性肾盂肾炎,微生物学治愈率为84.2%。妥布霉素在急性非复杂性感染中的微生物学治愈率为70%,在复杂性感染中为80%。我们观察到两种抗菌药物在临床和生物学上都有良好的耐受性。未观察到副作用。血清和血液生化分析以及凝血试验均未显示有变化。

相似文献

1
[Aztreonam versus tobramycin in acute pyelonephritis. A comparative study].氨曲南与妥布霉素治疗急性肾盂肾炎的比较研究
Arch Esp Urol. 1989 Mar;42(2):116-9.
2
[Bacterial infections in cancer patients without neutropenia. Comparison between 2 antibiotic combinations (aztreonam and oxacillin versus cefoxitin and tobramycin)].[非中性粒细胞减少的癌症患者的细菌感染。两种抗生素组合(氨曲南和苯唑西林与头孢西丁和妥布霉素)的比较]
Clin Ter. 1989 Nov 15;131(3):177-82.
3
[Aztreonam vs norfloxacin: a comparative study of the treatment of urinary tract infections in ambulatory and hospitalized patients].氨曲南与诺氟沙星:门诊及住院患者尿路感染治疗的对比研究
Clin Ter. 1989 Apr 30;129(2):113-21.
4
Cefamandole alone and combined with gentamicin or tobramycin in the treatment of acute pyelonephritis.
Scand J Infect Dis Suppl. 1980;suppl 25:96-100.
5
[Clinical evaluation of aztreonam for complicated urinary tract infection].氨曲南治疗复杂性尿路感染的临床评估
Hinyokika Kiyo. 1985 Sep;31(9):1675-80.
6
Comparison of empiric aztreonam and aminoglycoside regimens in the treatment of serious gram-negative lower respiratory infections.
Clin Ther. 1993 Jan-Feb;15(1):65-78.
7
[Clinical efficacy of aztreonam in patients with complicated urinary tract infections].氨曲南治疗复杂性尿路感染患者的临床疗效
Hinyokika Kiyo. 1988 Dec;34(12):2225-32.
8
Risk factors for a poor outcome after therapy for acute pyelonephritis.急性肾盂肾炎治疗后预后不良的危险因素。
BJU Int. 2006 Jul;98(1):141-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2006.06222.x.
9
A comparative analysis of aztreonam + clindamycin versus tobramycin + clindamycin or amikacin + mezlocillin in the treatment of gram-negative lower respiratory tract infections.
Chemotherapy. 1989;35 Suppl 1:89-100. doi: 10.1159/000238726.
10
[Current role of aminoglycosides in the treatment of acute pyelonephritis].[氨基糖苷类药物在急性肾盂肾炎治疗中的当前作用]
Prog Urol. 1998 Dec;8(6):1077-9.