• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

黑猩猩、倭黑猩猩和人类觅食者群体间袭击行为的有利条件。

The Conditions Favoring Between-Community Raiding in Chimpanzees, Bonobos, and Human Foragers.

作者信息

Pandit Sagar A, Pradhan Gauri R, Balashov Hennadii, Van Schaik Carel P

机构信息

Department of Physics, University of South Florida, 4202 E Fowler Ave, ISA2019, Tampa, FL, 33620, USA.

Anthropological Institute and Museum, University of Zurich, Winterthurerstrasse 190, CH-8057, Zurich, Switzerland.

出版信息

Hum Nat. 2016 Jun;27(2):141-59. doi: 10.1007/s12110-015-9252-5.

DOI:10.1007/s12110-015-9252-5
PMID:26613587
Abstract

Chimpanzees, bonobos, and human foragers share a fission-fusion social system and a mating system of joint male resource defense polygyny. Within-community skew in male strength varies among and within species. In this study, we extend a mathematical model of within-group male coalition formation among primates to derive the conditions for between-community conflicts in the form of raids. We show that the main factor affecting the presence of successful raiding is the likelihood of major discrepancies in party strength, which are set by party size distributions (and thus community size) and the skew in strength. This study confirms the functional similarities between the raiding of chimpanzees and human foragers, and it supports the "imbalance of power" hypothesis for raiding. However, it also proposes two amendments to this model. First, the absence of raiding in bonobos may be attributable more to potential female involvement in defense against raids, which increases the size of defensive coalitions. Second, the model attributes some of the raiding in humans to major contrasts in instantaneous fighting ability created by surprise raids on unarmed victims; it also draws attention to the distinction between minor raids and major raids that involve multiple bands of the same community.

摘要

黑猩猩、倭黑猩猩和人类觅食者有着裂变-融合的社会系统以及联合雄性资源防御多偶制的交配系统。群体内部雄性力量的不均衡在不同物种之间以及同一物种内部都存在差异。在本研究中,我们扩展了一个关于灵长类动物群体内部雄性联盟形成的数学模型,以推导以突袭形式出现的群体间冲突的条件。我们表明,影响成功突袭存在的主要因素是群体力量出现重大差异的可能性,这种差异由群体规模分布(进而由群落规模)以及力量不均衡所决定。本研究证实了黑猩猩和人类觅食者突袭行为之间的功能相似性,并支持了关于突袭的“权力失衡”假说。然而,它也对该模型提出了两点修正。第一,倭黑猩猩没有突袭行为可能更多地归因于雌性可能参与抵御突袭,这增加了防御联盟的规模。第二,该模型将人类的一些突袭行为归因于对 unarmed 受害者的突袭所造成的瞬间战斗能力的重大差异;它还提请注意涉及同一群落多个群体的小规模突袭和大规模突袭之间的区别。 (注:原文中“unarmed”一词在翻译时保留英文,因为不清楚其准确含义,可能是特定领域术语,需结合更多背景信息理解)

相似文献

1
The Conditions Favoring Between-Community Raiding in Chimpanzees, Bonobos, and Human Foragers.黑猩猩、倭黑猩猩和人类觅食者群体间袭击行为的有利条件。
Hum Nat. 2016 Jun;27(2):141-59. doi: 10.1007/s12110-015-9252-5.
2
Comparison of male conflict behavior in chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) and bonobos (Pan paniscus), with specific regard to coalition and post-conflict behavior.黑猩猩(Pan troglodytes)和倭黑猩猩(Pan paniscus)雄性冲突行为的比较,特别关注联盟行为和冲突后行为。
Am J Primatol. 2017 Jun;79(6). doi: 10.1002/ajp.22641.
3
Comparative analysis of intragroup intermale relationships: a study of wild bonobos (Pan paniscus) in Wamba, Democratic Republic of Congo and chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) in Kalinzu Forest Reserve, Uganda.群体内雄性关系的比较分析:对刚果民主共和国万巴地区野生倭黑猩猩(Pan paniscus)和乌干达卡林祖森林保护区黑猩猩(Pan troglodytes)的研究。
Primates. 2024 Jul;65(4):243-255. doi: 10.1007/s10329-024-01134-8. Epub 2024 May 31.
4
Factors underlying party size differences between chimpanzees and bonobos: a review and hypotheses for future study.黑猩猩与倭黑猩猩群体规模差异的潜在因素:综述与未来研究假设
Primates. 2009 Jul;50(3):197-209. doi: 10.1007/s10329-009-0141-6. Epub 2009 Apr 8.
5
A Comparison Between Bonobos and Chimpanzees: A Review and Update.倭黑猩猩与黑猩猩的比较:综述与更新
Evol Anthropol. 2016 Sep;25(5):239-252. doi: 10.1002/evan.21501.
6
Raiding parties of male spider monkeys: insights into human warfare?雄性蜘蛛猴的劫掠队伍:对人类战争的启示?
Am J Phys Anthropol. 2006 Dec;131(4):486-97. doi: 10.1002/ajpa.20451.
7
Male reproductive skew is higher in bonobos than chimpanzees.雄性繁殖偏好在倭黑猩猩中比在黑猩猩中更高。
Curr Biol. 2017 Jul 10;27(13):R640-R641. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2017.05.039.
8
Bonobos show limited social tolerance in a group setting: a comparison with chimpanzees and a test of the relational model.倭黑猩猩在群体环境中表现出有限的社会容忍度:与黑猩猩的比较及关系模型测试。
Folia Primatol (Basel). 2015;86(3):164-77. doi: 10.1159/000373886. Epub 2015 Apr 28.
9
Differences in expression of male aggression between wild bonobos and chimpanzees.野生倭黑猩猩和黑猩猩雄性攻击性表达的差异。
Curr Biol. 2024 Apr 22;34(8):1780-1785.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2024.02.071. Epub 2024 Apr 12.
10
Animal behavior: A tale of two apes.动物行为:两只猿猴的故事。
Curr Biol. 2024 May 6;34(9):R353-R355. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2024.03.056.

引用本文的文献

1
Behavioral and neural responses to social exclusion in women: the role of facial attractiveness and friendliness.女性遭受社会排斥时的行为和神经反应:面部吸引力和友善程度的作用。
Sci Rep. 2024 Jul 2;14(1):15135. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-65833-4.
2
Key individuals catalyse intergroup violence.关键人物催化群体间暴力。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2022 May 23;377(1851):20210141. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2021.0141. Epub 2022 Apr 4.
3
Group dominance increases territory size and reduces neighbour pressure in wild chimpanzees.群体优势会增加野生黑猩猩的领地大小并减轻来自邻居的压力。

本文引用的文献

1
Warfare and reproductive success in a tribal population.部落人群中的战争与生殖成功
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015 Jan 13;112(2):348-53. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1412287112. Epub 2014 Dec 29.
2
Ecology rather than psychology explains co-occurrence of predation and border patrols in male chimpanzees.生态学而非心理学解释了雄性黑猩猩捕食行为和边境巡逻行为同时出现的现象。
Anim Behav. 2013 Jul;86(1):61-74. doi: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2013.04.012.
3
Lethal coalitionary aggression and long-term alliance formation among Yanomamö men.亚诺玛米男性之间致命的联盟性攻击与长期联盟的形成
R Soc Open Sci. 2020 May 27;7(5):200577. doi: 10.1098/rsos.200577. eCollection 2020 May.
4
A model for warfare in stratified small-scale societies: The effect of within-group inequality.分层小规模社会中的战争模型:群体内部不平等的影响。
PLoS One. 2017 Dec 11;12(12):e0188970. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0188970. eCollection 2017.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014 Nov 25;111(47):16662-9. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1418639111. Epub 2014 Oct 27.
4
Lethal aggression in Pan is better explained by adaptive strategies than human impacts.人类活动的影响不如适应策略更能解释黑豹的致命攻击行为。
Nature. 2014 Sep 18;513(7518):414-7. doi: 10.1038/nature13727.
5
Why do chimpanzee males attack the females of neighboring communities?为什么黑猩猩雄性会攻击邻近群落的雌性?
Am J Phys Anthropol. 2014 Nov;155(3):430-5. doi: 10.1002/ajpa.22589. Epub 2014 Aug 6.
6
The two sides of warfare: an extended model of altruistic behavior in ancestral human intergroup conflict.战争的两面:人类祖先群体间冲突中利他行为的扩展模型
Hum Nat. 2014 Sep;25(3):359-77. doi: 10.1007/s12110-014-9199-y.
7
The role of rewards in motivating participation in simple warfare.奖励在激励简单战争参与度中的作用。
Hum Nat. 2013 Dec;24(4):444-60. doi: 10.1007/s12110-013-9178-8.
8
On the antiquity of language: the reinterpretation of Neandertal linguistic capacities and its consequences.论语言的古老性:重新解读尼安德特人的语言能力及其影响。
Front Psychol. 2013 Jul 5;4:397. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00397. eCollection 2013.
9
The collective action problem in primate territory economics.灵长类动物领域经济学中的集体行动问题。
Proc Biol Sci. 2013 Mar 20;280(1759):20130081. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2013.0081. Print 2013 May 22.
10
Evidence for early hafted hunting technology.有证据表明早期就出现了装柄的狩猎技术。
Science. 2012 Nov 16;338(6109):942-6. doi: 10.1126/science.1227608.