Fitzpatrick Scott J
Centre for Rural and Remote Mental Health, The University of Newcastle, Locked Bag 6005, Orange, NSW, 2800, Australia.
J Bioeth Inq. 2015 Dec;12(4):613-22. doi: 10.1007/s11673-015-9662-4. Epub 2015 Nov 28.
As one component of a broader social and normative response to the problem of suicide, scientism served to minimize sociopolitical and religious conflict around the issue. As such, it embodied, and continues to embody, a number of interests and values, as well as serving important social functions. It is thus comparable with other normative frameworks and can be appraised, from an ethical perspective, in light of these values, interests, and functions. This work examines the key values, interests, and functions of scientism in suicidology and argues that although scientism has had some social benefit, it primarily serves to maintain political and professional interests and has damaging implications for suicide research and prevention.
作为对自杀问题更广泛的社会和规范回应的一个组成部分,科学主义有助于减少围绕该问题的社会政治和宗教冲突。因此,它体现了并将继续体现一些利益和价值观,同时履行重要的社会功能。因此,它可与其他规范框架相比较,并可从伦理角度根据这些价值观、利益和功能进行评估。这项工作审视了科学主义在自杀学中的关键价值观、利益和功能,并认为尽管科学主义带来了一些社会效益,但它主要是为了维护政治和专业利益,对自杀研究和预防具有破坏性影响。