Grubb Christopher S, Jani Ashish, Wu Cheng-Chia, Saad Shumaila, Qureshi Yasir H, Nanda Tavish, Yaeh Andrew, Rozenblat Tzlil, Sisti Michael B, Bruce Jeffrey N, McKhann Guy M, Sheth Sameer A, Lesser Jeraldine, Cheng Simon K, Isaacson Steven R, Lassman Andrew B, Connolly Eileen P, Wang Tony J C
Department of Radiation Oncology, Columbia University Medical Center, 622 West 168th Street, BNH B011, New York, NY, 10032, USA.
The Taub Institute for Research on Alzheimer's Disease and the Aging Brain, Columbia University Medical Center, 630 West 168th Street, New York, NY, 10032, USA.
J Neurooncol. 2016 Mar;127(1):103-10. doi: 10.1007/s11060-015-2014-8. Epub 2015 Nov 28.
We investigated effects of breast cancer subtype on overall survival (OS), local and distant control, and time from initial diagnosis to brain metastases (BM). We also investigated advances in graded prognostic assessment (GPA) scores. A cohort of 72 patients treated for BM from breast cancer with Gamma Knife stereotactic radiosurgery at our institution from 2000 to 2014 had subtyping available and were used for this study. Median follow up for OS was 12 months and for control was 6 months. OS for luminal, HER2, and triple negative subtypes were 26, 20, and 22 months. OS when stratified by Sperduto et al. (J Clin Oncol 30(4):419-425, 2012) and Subbiah et al. (J Clin Oncol 33(20):2239-2245, 2015) GPAs were similar (p = 0.087 and p = 0.063). KPS and treatment modality were significant for OS (p = 0.002; p = 0.034). On univariate analysis, triple negative subtype and >3 BM were trending and significant for decreased OS (p = 0.084; p = 0.047). On multivariable analysis HER2, triple negative, and >3 BM were significant for OS (p = 0.022; p = 0.040; p = 0.009). Subtype was significant for response on a per lesion basis (p = 0.007). Subtype was trending towards significance when analyzing time from initial diagnosis to BM treatment (p = 0.064). Breast cancer subtype is an important prognostic factor when stratifying breast cancer patients with BM. The addition of number of BM to the GPA is a useful addition and should be further investigated. Subtype has an effect on lesion response, and also on rate of development BM after initial diagnosis.
我们研究了乳腺癌亚型对总生存期(OS)、局部和远处控制以及从初始诊断到脑转移(BM)时间的影响。我们还研究了分级预后评估(GPA)评分的进展。2000年至2014年在我们机构接受伽玛刀立体定向放射外科治疗的72例乳腺癌脑转移患者队列有亚型数据,用于本研究。OS的中位随访时间为12个月,控制情况的中位随访时间为6个月。管腔型、HER2型和三阴性亚型的OS分别为26个月、20个月和22个月。根据Sperduto等人(《临床肿瘤学杂志》30(4):419 - 425, 2012年)和Subbiah等人(《临床肿瘤学杂志》33(20):2239 - 2245, 2015年)的GPA进行分层时,OS相似(p = 0.087和p = 0.063)。KPS和治疗方式对OS有显著影响(p = 0.002;p = 0.034)。单因素分析时,三阴性亚型和>3个脑转移灶对OS降低有趋势性且显著影响(p = 0.084;p = 0.047)。多因素分析时,HER2型、三阴性和>3个脑转移灶对OS有显著影响(p = 0.022;p = 0.040;p = 0.009)。亚型对每个病灶的反应有显著影响(p = 0.007)。分析从初始诊断到BM治疗的时间时,亚型有显著影响的趋势(p = 0.064)。在对有脑转移的乳腺癌患者进行分层时,乳腺癌亚型是一个重要的预后因素。将脑转移灶数量添加到GPA中是一个有用的补充,应进一步研究。亚型对病灶反应有影响,对初始诊断后脑转移的发生率也有影响。