Suppr超能文献

友谊中包含什么?同伴的可见性有助于朋友间的认知协作。

What's in a Friendship? Partner Visibility Supports Cognitive Collaboration between Friends.

作者信息

Brennan Allison A, Enns James T

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC, Canada.

Department of Psychology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2015 Nov 30;10(11):e0143469. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0143469. eCollection 2015.

Abstract

Not all cognitive collaborations are equally effective. We tested whether friendship and communication influenced collaborative efficiency by randomly assigning participants to complete a cognitive task with a friend or non-friend, while visible to their partner or separated by a partition. Collaborative efficiency was indexed by comparing each pair's performance to an optimal individual performance model of the same two people. The outcome was a strong interaction between friendship and partner visibility. Friends collaborated more efficiently than non-friends when visible to one another, but a partition that prevented pair members from seeing one another reduced the collaborative efficiency of friends and non-friends to a similar lower level. Secondary measures suggested that verbal communication differences, but not psychophysiological arousal, contributed to these effects. Analysis of covariance indicated that females contributed more than males to overall levels of collaboration, but that the interaction of friendship and visibility was independent of that effect. These findings highlight the critical role of partner visibility in the collaborative success of friends.

摘要

并非所有认知合作都具有同等的效果。我们通过随机分配参与者与朋友或非朋友一起完成一项认知任务,同时让他们的搭档能看到他们或用隔板隔开,来测试友谊和交流是否会影响合作效率。通过将每对参与者的表现与相同两人的最佳个体表现模型进行比较来衡量合作效率。结果显示友谊和搭档可见性之间存在强烈的交互作用。当彼此可见时,朋友间的合作比非朋友间更高效,但隔板使搭档成员彼此看不见时,朋友和非朋友的合作效率都会降至相似的较低水平。次要测量指标表明,言语交流差异而非心理生理唤醒对这些影响有作用。协方差分析表明,女性对总体合作水平的贡献大于男性,但友谊和可见性的交互作用与该效应无关。这些发现凸显了搭档可见性在朋友合作成功中的关键作用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9905/4664270/18f99177e4ea/pone.0143469.g001.jpg

相似文献

10
The alliance hypothesis for human friendship.人类友谊的联盟假说。
PLoS One. 2009 Jun 3;4(6):e5802. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0005802.

引用本文的文献

3
The dynamics of competition and decision-making.竞争与决策的动态变化。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2024 Dec;31(6):2811-2822. doi: 10.3758/s13423-024-02523-2. Epub 2024 Jun 10.
6
Labor division in collaborative visual search: a review.协同视觉搜索中的劳动分工:综述。
Psychol Res. 2023 Jul;87(5):1323-1333. doi: 10.1007/s00426-022-01767-8. Epub 2022 Nov 15.

本文引用的文献

3
Coming to terms: quantifying the benefits of linguistic coordination.达成共识:量化语言协调的好处。
Psychol Sci. 2012 Aug 1;23(8):931-9. doi: 10.1177/0956797612436816. Epub 2012 Jul 17.
4
What failure in collective decision-making tells us about metacognition.集体决策失败告诉了我们什么有关元认知的信息。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2012 May 19;367(1594):1350-65. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2011.0420.
5
Effects of a coactor's focus of attention on task performance.协作者注意力焦点对任务表现的影响。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2012 Dec;38(6):1404-15. doi: 10.1037/a0027523. Epub 2012 Mar 12.
7
Does collocation inform the impact of collaboration?搭配是否影响合作?
PLoS One. 2010 Dec 15;5(12):e14279. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0014279.
8
Coordinating spatial referencing using shared gaze.使用共享注视协调空间参照。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2010 Oct;17(5):718-24. doi: 10.3758/PBR.17.5.718.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验