Darlington P J
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1977 Apr;74(4):1647-51. doi: 10.1073/pnas.74.4.1647.
Comparisons of six hypothetical cases suggest that Haldane overstimated the cost of natural selection by allele substitution. The cost is reduced if recessive alleles are advantageous, if substitutions are large and few, if selection is strong and substitutions are rapid, if substitutions are serial, and if substitutions in small demes are followed by deme-group substitutions. But costs are still so heavy that the adaptations of complex organisms in complex and changing environments are never completed. The rule probably is that most species most of the time are not fully adapted to their environments, but are just a little better than their competitors for the time being.
对六个假设案例的比较表明,霍尔丹高估了等位基因替代造成的自然选择成本。如果隐性等位基因具有优势,如果替代数量少且规模大,如果选择强烈且替代迅速,如果替代是连续的,以及如果小种群中的替代之后是种群组替代,那么成本会降低。但成本仍然如此之高,以至于复杂生物在复杂多变环境中的适应性永远无法完成。可能的规律是,大多数物种在大多数时候并未完全适应其环境,而只是暂时比其竞争对手略胜一筹。