Department of Anesthesiology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Department of Medical Education, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.
Med Educ Online. 2024 Dec 31;29(1):2396166. doi: 10.1080/10872981.2024.2396166. Epub 2024 Sep 8.
Addressing systemic bias in medical school assessment is an urgent task for medical education. This paper outlines recommendations on topic areas for further research on systemic bias, developed from a workshop discussion at the 2023 annual meeting of the Society of Directors of Research in Medical Education.
During the workshop, directors engaged in small-group discussions on guidelines to address bias in assessment practices following a proposed categorization of 'Do's,' 'Don'ts,' and 'Don't knows' and listed their insights using anonymous sticky notes, which were shared and discussed with the larger group of participants. The authors performed a content analysis of the notes through deductive and inductive coding. We reviewed and discussed our analysis to reach consensus.
The workshop included 31 participants from 28 institutions across the US and Canada, generating 51 unique notes. Participants identified 23 research areas in need of further study. The inductive analysis of proposed research areas revealed four main topics: 1) The role of interventions, including pre-medical academic interventions, medical-education interventions, assessment approaches, and wellness interventions; 2) Professional development, including the definition and assessment of professionalism and professional identity formation; 3) Context, including patient care and systemic influences; and 4) Research approaches.
While limited to data from a single workshop, the results offered perspectives about areas for further research shared by a group of directors of medical education research units from diverse backgrounds. The workshop produced valuable insights into the need for more evidence-based interventions that promote more equitable assessment practices grounded in real-world situations and that attenuate the effects of bias.
解决医学院校评估中的系统性偏见是医学教育的当务之急。本文概述了在 2023 年医学教育研究主任学会年会上的一个研讨会讨论的关于系统性偏见进一步研究主题领域的建议。
在研讨会上,主任们围绕在提出的“做、不做和不知道”分类下解决评估实践中的偏见的指导方针进行了小组讨论,并使用匿名便利贴列出了他们的见解,这些便利贴与更大的参与者群体进行了分享和讨论。作者通过演绎和归纳编码对这些笔记进行了内容分析。我们对分析进行了审查和讨论,以达成共识。
该研讨会包括来自美国和加拿大 28 个机构的 31 名参与者,共产生了 51 个独特的便签。参与者确定了 23 个需要进一步研究的研究领域。对拟议研究领域的归纳分析揭示了四个主要主题:1)干预措施的作用,包括医学前学术干预措施、医学教育干预措施、评估方法和健康干预措施;2)专业发展,包括专业精神和专业身份形成的定义和评估;3)背景,包括患者护理和系统影响;4)研究方法。
尽管该结果仅限于单个研讨会的数据,但它提供了来自不同背景的医学教育研究单位主任们对进一步研究领域的观点。该研讨会深入了解了需要更多基于证据的干预措施的必要性,这些干预措施可以促进更公平的评估实践,这些实践基于现实情况,并减轻偏见的影响。