Suppr超能文献

局部用硫唑嘌呤和倍他米松与单纯倍他米松润肤霜治疗2至18岁中重度特应性皮炎患者的疗效比较:一项随机对照试验

Efficacy of topical azathioprine and betamethasone versus betamethasone-only emollient cream in 2-18 years old patients with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis: A randomized controlled trial.

作者信息

Iraji Fariba, Farhadi Sadaf, Faghihi Gita, Mokhtari Fatemeh, Basiri Akram, Jafari-Koshki Tohid, Nilforoushzadeh Mohammad Ali

机构信息

Skin Diseases and Leishmaniasis Research Center, Department of Dermatology, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.

Department of Dermatology, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.

出版信息

Adv Biomed Res. 2015 Oct 7;4:228. doi: 10.4103/2277-9175.166651. eCollection 2015.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Atopic dermatitis is a chronic skin disease with increasing prevalence worldwide and a considerable burden especially among children. To circumvent the problems related to oral azathioprine (AZT) we aimed to evaluate its topical variant and assess its efficacy in patients aged 2-18.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In a single-blind trial, we randomized the patients into two groups, one treated with topical emollient containing AZT and betamethasone (BM), and the other treated solely with topical emollient of BM. The treatments were administered twice a day for 8 weeks in both groups. The efficacy, recurrence, and the presence of side effects were evaluated using SPSS 20.

RESULTS

The amount of reduction in severity scoring for atopic dermatitis (SCORAD) score was significantly greater in the group treated with the topical AZT (P = 0.024). Incidentally, there were no difference between two treatments in difference in proportions of recurrence and adverse effects as well as SCORAD reduction in subgroups of sex and age (all P > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Our results showed the superiority of topical AZT over BM with a low recurrence and adverse effects. No expectation of severe side effects, like those of oral AZT, is the major advantage of topical AZT. The sample size was an issue in uncovering the value of AZT in the subgroups. Conducting prolonged studies of quality-of-life and comparing the topical AZT potency relative to the common alternatives are recommended areas of future work.

摘要

背景

特应性皮炎是一种慢性皮肤病,在全球范围内患病率不断上升,尤其是在儿童中负担较重。为了规避与口服硫唑嘌呤(AZT)相关的问题,我们旨在评估其局部用药变体,并评估其在2至18岁患者中的疗效。

材料与方法

在一项单盲试验中,我们将患者随机分为两组,一组使用含AZT和倍他米松(BM)的局部润肤剂治疗,另一组仅使用BM局部润肤剂治疗。两组均每天给药两次,持续8周。使用SPSS 20评估疗效、复发情况和副作用的存在情况。

结果

局部使用AZT治疗的组中,特应性皮炎严重程度评分(SCORAD)的降低幅度显著更大(P = 0.024)。顺便说一句,两种治疗在复发率、不良反应比例以及性别和年龄亚组中SCORAD降低方面没有差异(所有P>0.05)。

结论

我们的结果显示局部使用AZT优于BM,复发率和不良反应较低。局部使用AZT的主要优势在于不会像口服AZT那样出现严重副作用。样本量是揭示AZT在亚组中的价值的一个问题。建议未来开展关于生活质量的长期研究,并比较局部使用AZT与常用替代药物的效力。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dde2/4638058/a656a562d5c8/ABR-4-228-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验