McKeever Tricia M, Hearson Glenn, Housley Gemma, Reynolds Catherine, Kinnear William, Harrison Tim W, Kelly Anne-Maree, Shaw Dominick E
Division of Epidemiology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Respiratory Research Unit, Division of Respiratory Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Thorax. 2016 Mar;71(3):210-5. doi: 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2015-207573. Epub 2015 Dec 1.
Identifying acute hypercapnic respiratory failure is crucial in the initial management of acute exacerbations of COPD. Guidelines recommend obtaining arterial blood samples but these are more difficult to obtain than venous. We assessed whether blood gas values derived from venous blood could replace arterial at initial assessment.
Patients requiring hospital treatment for an exacerbation of COPD had paired arterial and venous samples taken. Bland-Altman analyses were performed to assess agreement between arterial and venous pH, CO2 and HCO3-. The relationship between SpO2 and SaO2 was assessed. The number of attempts and pain scores for each sample were measured.
234 patients were studied. There was good agreement between arterial and venous measures of pH and HC)3- (mean difference 0.03 and -0.04, limits of agreement -0.05 to 0.11 and -2.90 to 2.82, respectively), and between SaO2 and SpO2 (in patients with an SpO2 of >80%). Arterial sampling required more attempts and was more painful than venous (mean pain score 4 (IQR 2-5) and 1 (IQR 0-2), respectively, p<0.001).
Arterial sampling is more difficult and more painful than venous sampling. There is good agreement between pH and HCO3- values derived from venous and arterial blood, and between pulse oximetry and arterial blood gas oxygen saturations. These agreements could allow the initial assessment of COPD exacerbations to be based on venous blood gas analysis and pulse oximetry, simplifying the care pathway and improving the patient experience.
在慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)急性加重的初始管理中,识别急性高碳酸血症性呼吸衰竭至关重要。指南建议采集动脉血样本,但采集动脉血比静脉血更困难。我们评估了在初始评估时,源自静脉血的血气值是否可以替代动脉血。
因COPD急性加重需要住院治疗的患者采集了配对的动脉血和静脉血样本。进行布兰德-奥特曼分析以评估动脉血和静脉血的pH值、二氧化碳和碳酸氢根之间的一致性。评估了脉搏血氧饱和度(SpO₂)和动脉血氧饱和度(SaO₂)之间的关系。测量了每个样本的穿刺尝试次数和疼痛评分。
对234例患者进行了研究。动脉血和静脉血的pH值及碳酸氢根测量值之间具有良好的一致性(平均差异分别为0.03和-0.04,一致性界限分别为-0.05至0.11和-2.90至2.82),并且在脉搏血氧饱和度(SpO₂)大于80%的患者中,动脉血氧饱和度(SaO₂)和脉搏血氧饱和度(SpO₂)之间也具有良好的一致性。采集动脉血比静脉血需要更多的穿刺尝试且更疼痛(平均疼痛评分分别为4(四分位间距2-5)和1(四分位间距0-2),p<0.001)。
采集动脉血比采集静脉血更困难且更疼痛。源自静脉血和动脉血的pH值及碳酸氢根值之间,以及脉搏血氧饱和度和动脉血气氧饱和度之间具有良好的一致性。这些一致性可以使COPD急性加重的初始评估基于静脉血气分析和脉搏血氧饱和度测定,从而简化护理流程并改善患者体验。