Koop H M, Valentijn-Benz M, Nieuw Amerongen A V, Roukema P A, De Graaff J
Department of Oral Biochemistry, Free University, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek. 1989;55(2):109-22. doi: 10.1007/BF00404751.
For comparison, human whole saliva-induced aggregation was studied by phase-contrast microscopy, spectrophotometry combined with macroscopic observations, and in microtiterplate assay under identical experimental conditions for Actinomyces viscosus HG 85 (T14-V) and HG 380 (T14-AV), Bacteroides gingivalis HG 66 (W 83), Streptococcus rattus HG 59 (BHT), and Streptococcus sanguis I HG 169. The entire process of formation, extension, and sedimentation of aggregates could merely be observed by the combination of these assays. The very first stages of aggregation could only be detected and quantitated by phase-contrast microscopy. Within 2 1/2 min, 50% of the A. viscosus, S. rattus, and S. sanguis cells were aggregated, denoted as T50. In microtiterplates, however, aggregates were observed in general only after sedimentation at 30-45 min of incubation, expressed as TA. For interpretation of the spectrophotometric curves, additional microscopic and macroscopic data were a prerequisite. The small decline in absorbance during the first 30-45 min (phase 1) corresponded to the formation and extension of nonsedimenting aggregates, whereas the subsequent pronounced fall in absorbance (phase 2) was caused by the massive sedimentation of aggregates. The moment of inflexion between both phases, TI, marked the onset of sedimentation of aggregates and corresponded very well with TA, at which time already 92-98% of the cells were aggregated as quantitated by microscopy. In conclusion, only by microscopy the formation and extension of aggregates could be observed within a few minutes and quantitated in terms of aggregation rate. From 30-45 min, merely the sedimentation of aggregates was visualized in microtiterplates, whereas the time course of the overall process was recorded indirectly by spectrophotometry.
为作比较,在相同实验条件下,采用相差显微镜、分光光度法结合宏观观察以及微量滴定板试验,对粘性放线菌HG 85(T14-V)和HG 380(T14-AV)、牙龈拟杆菌HG 66(W 83)、鼠链球菌HG 59(BHT)以及血链球菌I HG 169进行人全唾液诱导聚集的研究。仅通过这些试验的组合才能观察到聚集体形成、扩展和沉降的整个过程。聚集的最初阶段只能通过相差显微镜检测和定量。在2分半钟内,50%的粘性放线菌、鼠链球菌和血链球菌细胞发生聚集,记为T50。然而,在微量滴定板中,通常仅在孵育30 - 45分钟沉降后才观察到聚集体,记为TA。为解释分光光度曲线,额外的显微镜和宏观数据是前提条件。在最初30 - 45分钟(阶段1)吸光度的小幅下降对应于非沉降聚集体的形成和扩展,而随后吸光度的显著下降(阶段2)是由聚集体的大量沉降引起的。两个阶段之间的拐点TI标志着聚集体沉降的开始,与TA非常吻合,此时通过显微镜定量已有92 - 98%的细胞发生聚集。总之,只有通过显微镜才能在几分钟内观察到聚集体的形成和扩展,并根据聚集速率进行定量。从30 - 45分钟起,仅在微量滴定板中观察到聚集体的沉降,而整个过程的时间进程通过分光光度法间接记录。