Annane Djillali, Bellissant Eric, Bollaert Pierre Edouard, Briegel Josef, Keh Didier, Kupfer Yizhak
Critical Care Department, Hôpital Raymond Poincaré, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris, 104. Boulevard Raymond Poincaré, Garches, Ile de France, France, 92380.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Dec 3;2015(12):CD002243. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002243.pub3.
Sepsis occurs when an infection is complicated by organ failures as defined by a sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score of two or higher. Sepsis may be complicated by impaired corticosteroid metabolism. Giving corticosteroids may benefit patients. The original review was published in 2004 and was updated in 2010 and again in 2015.
To examine the effects of corticosteroids on death at one month in patients with sepsis, and to examine whether dose and duration of corticosteroids influence patient response to this treatment.
We searched the Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL; 2014, Issue 10), MEDLINE (October 2014), EMBASE (October 2014), Latin American Caribbean Health Sciences Literature (LILACS; October 2014) and reference lists of articles, and we contacted trial authors. The original searches were performed in August 2003 and in October 2009.
We included randomized controlled trials of corticosteroids versus placebo or supportive treatment in patients with sepsis.
All review authors agreed on the eligibility of trials. One review author extracted data, which were checked by the other review authors, and by the primary author of the paper when possible. We obtained some missing data from trial authors. We assessed the methodological quality of trials.
We identified nine additional studies since the last update, for a total of 33 eligible trials (n = 4268 participants). Twenty-three of these 33 trials were at low risk of selection bias, 22 were at low risk of performance and detection bias, 27 were at low risk of attrition bias and 14 were at low risk of selective reporting.Corticosteroids reduced 28-day mortality (27 trials; n = 3176; risk ratio (RR) 0.87, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.76 to 1.00; P value = 0.05, random-effects model). The quality of evidence for this outcome was downgraded from high to low for imprecision (upper limit of 95% CI = 1) and for inconsistency (significant heterogeneity across trial results). Heterogeneity was related in part to the dosing strategy. Treatment with a long course of low-dose corticosteroids significantly reduced 28-day mortality (22 trials; RR 0.87, 95% CI 0.78 to 0.97; P value = 0.01, fixed-effect model). The quality of evidence was downgraded from high to moderate for inconsistency (owing to non-significant effects shown by one large trial). Corticosteroids also reduced mortality rate in the intensive care unit (13 trials; RR 0.82, 95% CI 0.68 to 1.00; P value = 0.04, random-effects model) and at the hospital (17 trials; RR 0.85, 95% CI 0.73 to 0.98; P value = 0.03, random-effects model). Quality of the evidence for in-hospital mortality was downgraded from high to moderate for inconsistency and imprecision (upper limit of 95% CI for RR approaching 1). Corticosteroids increased the proportion of shock reversal by day seven (12 trials; RR 1.31, 95% CI 1.14 to 1.51; P value = 0.0001) and by day 28 (seven trials; n = 1013; RR 1.11, 95% CI 1.02 to 1.21; P value = 0.01) and reduced the SOFA score by day seven (eight trials; mean difference (MD) -1.53, 95% CI -2.04 to -1.03; P value < 0.00001, random-effects model) and survivors' length of stay in the intensive care unit (10 trials; MD -2.19, 95% CI -3.93 to -0.46; P value = 0.01, fixed-effect model) without inducing gastroduodenal bleeding (19 trials; RR 1.24, 95% CI 0. 92 to 1.67; P value = 0.15, fixed-effect model), superinfection (19 trials; RR 1.02, 95% CI 0.87 to 1.20; P value = 0.81, fixed-effect model) or neuromuscular weakness (three trials; RR 0.62, 95% CI 0.21 to 1.88; P value = 0.40, fixed-effect model). Corticosteroid increased the risk of hyperglycaemia (13 trials; RR 1.26, 95% CI 1.16 to 1.37; P value < 0.00001, fixed-effect model) and hypernatraemia (three trials; RR 1.64, 95% CI 1.28 to 2.09; P value < 0.0001, fixed-effect model).
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Overall, low-quality evidence indicates that corticosteroids reduce mortality among patients with sepsis. Moderate-quality evidence suggests that a long course of low-dose corticosteroids reduced 28-day mortality without inducing major complications and led to an increase in metabolic disorders.
当感染并发器官功能衰竭(根据序贯器官衰竭评估(SOFA)评分≥2 定义)时,即发生脓毒症。脓毒症可能并发皮质类固醇代谢受损。给予皮质类固醇可能使患者受益。本综述最初于 2004 年发表,2010 年及 2015 年进行了更新。
研究皮质类固醇对脓毒症患者 1 个月时死亡率的影响,并研究皮质类固醇的剂量和疗程是否影响患者对该治疗的反应。
我们检索了Cochrane 系统评价数据库(CENTRAL;2014 年第 10 期)、MEDLINE(2014 年 10 月)、EMBASE(2014 年 10 月)、拉丁美洲和加勒比健康科学文献数据库(LILACS;2014 年 10 月)以及文章的参考文献列表,并联系了试验作者。最初的检索于 2003 年 8 月和 2009 年 10 月进行。
我们纳入了皮质类固醇与安慰剂或支持治疗对比的脓毒症患者随机对照试验。
所有综述作者就试验的纳入标准达成一致。一名综述作者提取数据,其他综述作者进行核对,如有可能,还会由论文的第一作者进行核对。我们从试验作者处获取了一些缺失数据。我们评估了试验的方法学质量。
自上次更新以来,我们又识别出 9 项研究,共有 33 项符合条件的试验(n = 4268 名参与者)。这 33 项试验中,23 项存在低选择偏倚风险,22 项存在低实施和检测偏倚风险,27 项存在低失访偏倚风险,14 项存在低选择性报告偏倚风险。皮质类固醇降低了 28 天死亡率(27 项试验;n = 3176;风险比(RR)0.87,95%置信区间(CI)0.76至1.00;P值 = 0.05,随机效应模型)。由于不精确性(95%CI上限 = 1)和不一致性(试验结果存在显著异质性),该结果的证据质量从高等级降至低等级。异质性部分与给药策略有关。长期低剂量皮质类固醇治疗显著降低了 28 天死亡率(22 项试验;RR 0.87,95%CI 0.78至0.97;P值 = 0.01,固定效应模型)。由于不一致性(一项大型试验显示无显著效应),该证据质量从高等级降至中等等级。皮质类固醇还降低了重症监护病房的死亡率(13 项试验;RR 0.82,95%CI 0.68至1.00;P值 = 0.04,随机效应模型)以及医院内死亡率(17 项试验;RR 0.85,95%CI 0.73至0.98;P值 = 0.03,随机效应模型)。由于不一致性和不精确性(RR的95%CI上限接近1),医院内死亡率的证据质量从高等级降至中等等级。皮质类固醇增加了第7天休克逆转的比例(12项试验;RR 1.31,95%CI 1.14至1.51;P值 = 0.0001)以及第28天休克逆转的比例(7项试验;n = 1013;RR 1.11,95%CI 1.02至1.21;P值 = 0.01),并降低了第7天的SOFA评分(8项试验;平均差值(MD)-1.53,95%CI -2.04至-1.03;P值 < 0.00001,随机效应模型)以及幸存者在重症监护病房的住院时间(10项试验;MD -2.19,95%CI -3.93至-0.46;P值 = 0.01,固定效应模型),且未诱发胃十二指肠出血(19项试验;RR 1.24,95%CI 0.92至1.67;P值 = 0.15,固定效应模型)、二重感染(19项试验;RR 1.02,95%CI 0.87至1.