Dutch research funding, gender bias, and Simpson's paradox.
作者信息
Albers Casper J
机构信息
Heymans Institute for Psychological Research, University of Groningen, 9712 TS Groningen, The Netherlands
出版信息
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015 Dec 15;112(50):E6828-9. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1518936112. Epub 2015 Dec 3.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Dutch research funding, gender bias, and Simpson's paradox.荷兰的研究资金、性别偏见与辛普森悖论。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015 Dec 15;112(50):E6828-9. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1518936112. Epub 2015 Dec 3.
2
Reply to Albers: Acceptance of empirical evidence for gender disparities in Dutch research funding.对阿尔伯斯的回应：接受荷兰研究经费中性别差异的实证证据。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015 Dec 15;112(50):E6830. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1521336112. Epub 2015 Dec 3.
3
No evidence that gender contributes to personal research funding success in The Netherlands: A reaction to van der Lee and Ellemers.在荷兰，没有证据表明性别对个人获得研究资金的成功率有影响：对范德·李和埃勒默斯的回应。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015 Dec 22;112(51):E7036-7. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1519046112. Epub 2015 Dec 8.
4
Reply to Volker and Steenbeek: Multiple indicators point toward gender disparities in grant funding success in The Netherlands.对沃尔克和斯廷贝克的回应：多项指标表明荷兰科研经费资助成功方面存在性别差异。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015 Dec 22;112(51):E7038. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1521331112. Epub 2015 Dec 8.
5
Gender contributes to personal research funding success in The Netherlands.在荷兰，性别因素会影响个人获得研究资金的成功率。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015 Oct 6;112(40):12349-53. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1510159112. Epub 2015 Sep 21.
6
Defending Biomedical Science in an Era of Threatened Funding.在资金面临威胁的时代捍卫生物医学科学。
JAMA. 2017 Jun 27;317(24):2483-2484. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.5811.
7
How should research productivity be assessed in early career psychiatric researchers? research funding versus scientific productivity.在早期职业精神科研究人员中，应如何评估研究生产力？研究资金与科研生产力。
J Clin Psychiatry. 2009 Sep;70(9):1327-8; author reply 1328. doi: 10.4088/JCP.09lr05111.
8
The performance of China's biomedical innovation: a scientometric analysis.中国生物医药创新的表现：一项科学计量学分析。
Sci China Life Sci. 2016 Oct;59(10):1074-1082. doi: 10.1007/s11427-016-5078-6. Epub 2016 Jul 20.
9
The Last 50 Years: Mismeasurement and Mismanagement Are Impeding Scientific Research.过去五十年：测量错误与管理不善阻碍科研进展。
Curr Top Dev Biol. 2016;116:617-31. doi: 10.1016/bs.ctdb.2015.12.013. Epub 2016 Jan 20.
10
Stop this waste of people, animals and money.停止这种对人力、物力和财力的浪费。
Nature. 2017 Sep 6;549(7670):23-25. doi: 10.1038/549023a.
引用本文的文献
1
Female-dominated disciplines have lower evaluated research quality and funding success rates, for men and women.女性主导的学科领域，无论对男性还是女性，其研究质量和资助成功率的评估都较低。
Elife. 2024 Sep 5;13:RP97613. doi: 10.7554/eLife.97613.
2
Gender differences in Dutch research funding over time: A statistical investigation of the innovation scheme 2012-2021.性别差异在荷兰研究资金中的时间变化：创新计划 2012-2021 的统计研究。
PLoS One. 2024 Feb 16;19(2):e0297311. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0297311. eCollection 2024.
3
Gender inequality in cum laude distinctions for PhD students.博士生优秀论文荣誉称号中的性别不平等。
Sci Rep. 2023 Nov 29;13(1):20267. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-46375-7.
4
Exploring Gender Bias in Six Key Domains of Academic Science: An Adversarial Collaboration.探索学术科学六个关键领域的性别偏见：对抗性合作。
Psychol Sci Public Interest. 2023 Jul;24(1):15-73. doi: 10.1177/15291006231163179. Epub 2023 Apr 26.
5
Trends in gender of authors of original research in oncology among major medical journals: a retrospective bibliometric study.主要医学期刊中肿瘤学原创研究作者的性别趋势：一项回顾性文献计量学研究。
BMJ Open. 2021 Oct 18;11(10):e046618. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-046618.
6
The leaky pipeline in research grant peer review and funding decisions: challenges and future directions.研究资助同行评审和资金决策中的漏洞管道：挑战与未来方向。
High Educ (Dordr). 2021;82(1):145-162. doi: 10.1007/s10734-020-00626-y. Epub 2020 Oct 3.
7
Gender Differences in Grant Submissions across Science and Engineering Fields at the NSF.美国国家科学基金会（NSF）资助申请在科学与工程领域中的性别差异
Bioscience. 2020 Jul 29;70(9):814-820. doi: 10.1093/biosci/biaa072. eCollection 2020 Sep.
8
The aggregation paradox for statistical rankings and nonparametric tests.统计排名和非参数检验的聚集悖论。
PLoS One. 2020 Mar 12;15(3):e0228627. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0228627. eCollection 2020.
9
From presentation to paper: Gender disparities in oncological research.从展示到论文：肿瘤学研究中的性别差距。
Int J Cancer. 2020 Jun 1;146(11):3011-3021. doi: 10.1002/ijc.32660. Epub 2019 Oct 11.
10
Gender differences in obtaining and maintaining patent rights.在获取和维持专利权方面的性别差异。
Nat Biotechnol. 2018 Apr 5;36(4):307-309. doi: 10.1038/nbt.4120.
本文引用的文献
1
Gender contributes to personal research funding success in The Netherlands.在荷兰，性别因素会影响个人获得研究资金的成功率。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015 Oct 6;112(40):12349-53. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1510159112. Epub 2015 Sep 21.
2
Sex bias in graduate admissions: data from berkeley.研究生招生中的性别偏见：来自伯克利的数据。
Science. 1975 Feb 7;187(4175):398-404. doi: 10.1126/science.187.4175.398.
Zotero 插件