Whalen D H, Zunshine Lisa, Holquist Michael
Program in Speech-Language-Hearing Sciences, City University of New York New York, NY, USA ; Haskins Laboratories, New Haven CT, USA ; Department of Linguistics, Yale University, New Haven CT, USA.
Department of English, University of Kentucky, Lexington KY, USA.
Front Psychol. 2015 Nov 24;6:1778. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01778. eCollection 2015.
Reading fiction is a major component of intellectual life, yet it has proven difficult to study experimentally. One aspect of literature that has recently come to light is perspective embedding ("she thought I left" embedding her perspective on "I left"), which seems to be a defining feature of fiction. Previous work (Whalen et al., 2012) has shown that increasing levels of embedment affects the time that it takes readers to read and understand short vignettes in a moving window paradigm. With increasing levels of embedment from 1 to 5, reading times in a moving window paradigm rose almost linearly. However, level 0 was as slow as 3-4. Accuracy on probe questions was relatively constant until dropping at the fifth level. Here, we assessed this effect in a more ecologically valid ("typical") reading paradigm, in which the entire vignette was visible at once, either for as long as desired (Experiment 1) or a fixed time (Experiment 2). In Experiment 1, reading times followed a pattern similar to that of the previous experiment, with some differences in absolute speed. Accuracy matched previous results: fairly consistent accuracy until a decline at level 5, indicating that both presentation methods allowed understanding. In Experiment 2, accuracy was somewhat reduced, perhaps because participants were less successful at allocating their attention than they were during the earlier experiment; however, the pattern was the same. It seems that literature does not, on average, use easiest reading level but rather uses a middle ground that challenges the reader, but not too much.
阅读小说是智力生活的一个主要组成部分,但事实证明,通过实验研究它很困难。文学中最近才被发现的一个方面是视角嵌入(“她认为我离开了”将她对“我离开了”的视角嵌入其中),这似乎是小说的一个决定性特征。先前的研究(Whalen等人,2012年)表明,在移动窗口范式中,嵌入程度的增加会影响读者阅读和理解短篇短文所需的时间。随着嵌入程度从1级增加到5级,移动窗口范式中的阅读时间几乎呈线性上升。然而,0级的阅读速度与3 - 4级一样慢。在第五级之前,探测问题的准确率相对稳定,直到第五级才下降。在这里,我们在一种更符合生态效度的(“典型的”)阅读范式中评估了这种效应,在这种范式中,整个短文可以一次性全部看到,要么可以根据需要看任意长的时间(实验1),要么看固定的时间(实验2)。在实验1中,阅读时间遵循与先前实验相似的模式,只是绝对速度有所不同。准确率与先前的结果相符:在5级之前准确率相当一致,直到5级下降,这表明两种呈现方式都能让读者理解。在实验2中,准确率有所降低,可能是因为参与者在分配注意力方面不如早期实验成功;然而,模式是相同的。似乎文学作品平均而言并不是使用最容易的阅读水平,而是使用一种挑战读者但又不过分的中间水平。