• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

即使采用典型的文本呈现方式,视角嵌入的增加也会延长阅读时间:对文学阅读的启示。

Increases in Perspective Embedding Increase Reading Time Even with Typical Text Presentation: Implications for the Reading of Literature.

作者信息

Whalen D H, Zunshine Lisa, Holquist Michael

机构信息

Program in Speech-Language-Hearing Sciences, City University of New York New York, NY, USA ; Haskins Laboratories, New Haven CT, USA ; Department of Linguistics, Yale University, New Haven CT, USA.

Department of English, University of Kentucky, Lexington KY, USA.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2015 Nov 24;6:1778. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01778. eCollection 2015.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01778
PMID:26635684
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4656850/
Abstract

Reading fiction is a major component of intellectual life, yet it has proven difficult to study experimentally. One aspect of literature that has recently come to light is perspective embedding ("she thought I left" embedding her perspective on "I left"), which seems to be a defining feature of fiction. Previous work (Whalen et al., 2012) has shown that increasing levels of embedment affects the time that it takes readers to read and understand short vignettes in a moving window paradigm. With increasing levels of embedment from 1 to 5, reading times in a moving window paradigm rose almost linearly. However, level 0 was as slow as 3-4. Accuracy on probe questions was relatively constant until dropping at the fifth level. Here, we assessed this effect in a more ecologically valid ("typical") reading paradigm, in which the entire vignette was visible at once, either for as long as desired (Experiment 1) or a fixed time (Experiment 2). In Experiment 1, reading times followed a pattern similar to that of the previous experiment, with some differences in absolute speed. Accuracy matched previous results: fairly consistent accuracy until a decline at level 5, indicating that both presentation methods allowed understanding. In Experiment 2, accuracy was somewhat reduced, perhaps because participants were less successful at allocating their attention than they were during the earlier experiment; however, the pattern was the same. It seems that literature does not, on average, use easiest reading level but rather uses a middle ground that challenges the reader, but not too much.

摘要

阅读小说是智力生活的一个主要组成部分,但事实证明,通过实验研究它很困难。文学中最近才被发现的一个方面是视角嵌入(“她认为我离开了”将她对“我离开了”的视角嵌入其中),这似乎是小说的一个决定性特征。先前的研究(Whalen等人,2012年)表明,在移动窗口范式中,嵌入程度的增加会影响读者阅读和理解短篇短文所需的时间。随着嵌入程度从1级增加到5级,移动窗口范式中的阅读时间几乎呈线性上升。然而,0级的阅读速度与3 - 4级一样慢。在第五级之前,探测问题的准确率相对稳定,直到第五级才下降。在这里,我们在一种更符合生态效度的(“典型的”)阅读范式中评估了这种效应,在这种范式中,整个短文可以一次性全部看到,要么可以根据需要看任意长的时间(实验1),要么看固定的时间(实验2)。在实验1中,阅读时间遵循与先前实验相似的模式,只是绝对速度有所不同。准确率与先前的结果相符:在5级之前准确率相当一致,直到5级下降,这表明两种呈现方式都能让读者理解。在实验2中,准确率有所降低,可能是因为参与者在分配注意力方面不如早期实验成功;然而,模式是相同的。似乎文学作品平均而言并不是使用最容易的阅读水平,而是使用一种挑战读者但又不过分的中间水平。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3bc6/4656850/fbf81fb1aa07/fpsyg-06-01778-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3bc6/4656850/a89003e145d7/fpsyg-06-01778-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3bc6/4656850/77bc20fcc552/fpsyg-06-01778-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3bc6/4656850/fbf81fb1aa07/fpsyg-06-01778-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3bc6/4656850/a89003e145d7/fpsyg-06-01778-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3bc6/4656850/77bc20fcc552/fpsyg-06-01778-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3bc6/4656850/fbf81fb1aa07/fpsyg-06-01778-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Increases in Perspective Embedding Increase Reading Time Even with Typical Text Presentation: Implications for the Reading of Literature.即使采用典型的文本呈现方式,视角嵌入的增加也会延长阅读时间:对文学阅读的启示。
Front Psychol. 2015 Nov 24;6:1778. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01778. eCollection 2015.
2
Theory of Mind and embedding of perspective: A psychological test of a literary "sweet spot".心理理论与视角嵌入:文学“甜蜜点”的一项心理测试
Sci Study Lit. 2012 Jan 1;2(2):301-315. doi: 10.1075/ssol.2.2.06wha.
3
Exploring the different cognitive, emotional and imaginative experiences of autistic and non-autistic adult readers when contemplating serious literature as compared to non-fiction.探索自闭症成年读者与非自闭症成年读者在思考严肃文学作品与非虚构作品时不同的认知、情感和想象体验。
Front Psychol. 2023 May 4;14:1001268. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1001268. eCollection 2023.
4
Mind wandering increases linearly with text difficulty.思维漫游随文本难度呈线性增加。
Psychol Res. 2022 Feb;86(1):284-293. doi: 10.1007/s00426-021-01483-9. Epub 2021 Feb 12.
5
Macromolecular crowding: chemistry and physics meet biology (Ascona, Switzerland, 10-14 June 2012).大分子拥挤现象:化学与物理邂逅生物学(瑞士阿斯科纳,2012年6月10日至14日)
Phys Biol. 2013 Aug;10(4):040301. doi: 10.1088/1478-3975/10/4/040301. Epub 2013 Aug 2.
6
Text World Theory and real world readers: From literature to life in a Belfast prison.文本世界理论与现实世界读者:从文学到贝尔法斯特一所监狱里的生活
Lang Lit (Harlow). 2017 May;26(2):172-187. doi: 10.1177/0963947017704731. Epub 2017 May 21.
7
Does reading a single passage of literary fiction really improve theory of mind? An attempt at replication.阅读一段文学小说真的能提高心理理论吗?一项复制尝试。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2016 Nov;111(5):e46-e54. doi: 10.1037/pspa0000064. Epub 2016 Sep 19.
8
"Does reading a single passage of literary fiction really improve theory of mind? An attempt at replication": Correction to Panero et al. (2016)."阅读一段文学小说真的能提高心理理论吗?一项复制尝试":对 Panero 等人(2016 年)的更正。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2016 Nov;111(5):e55. doi: 10.1037/pspa0000067.
9
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
10
When Fiction Is Just as Real as Fact: No Differences in Reading Behavior between Stories Believed to be Based on True or Fictional Events.当虚构与事实一样真实时:人们阅读被认为基于真实或虚构事件的故事时,阅读行为并无差异。
Front Psychol. 2017 Sep 20;8:1618. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01618. eCollection 2017.

本文引用的文献

1
The Function of Fiction is the Abstraction and Simulation of Social Experience.虚构的作用是对社会经验的抽象和模拟。
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2008 May;3(3):173-92. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-6924.2008.00073.x.
2
Metaphor creates intimacy and temporarily enhances theory of mind.隐喻能创造亲密感并暂时增强心理理论。
Mem Cognit. 2015 Aug;43(6):953-63. doi: 10.3758/s13421-015-0508-4.
3
Narrativity and enaction: the social nature of literary narrative understanding.叙述与实施:文学叙事理解的社会本质。
Front Psychol. 2014 Aug 22;5:895. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00895. eCollection 2014.
4
Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal.用于验证性假设检验的随机效应结构:保持其最大化。
J Mem Lang. 2013 Apr;68(3). doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2012.11.001.
5
Effects of contextual constraint on eye movements in reading: A further examination.语境约束对阅读中眼球运动的影响:进一步的考察。
Psychon Bull Rev. 1996 Dec;3(4):504-9. doi: 10.3758/BF03214555.
6
Theory of Mind and embedding of perspective: A psychological test of a literary "sweet spot".心理理论与视角嵌入:文学“甜蜜点”的一项心理测试
Sci Study Lit. 2012 Jan 1;2(2):301-315. doi: 10.1075/ssol.2.2.06wha.
7
Specific to whose body? Perspective-taking and the spatial mapping of valence.具体针对谁的身体?换位思考与情感效价的空间映射。
Front Psychol. 2013 May 13;4:266. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00266. eCollection 2013.
8
Mind wandering while reading easy and difficult texts.阅读简单和困难文本时的走神。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2013 Jun;20(3):586-92. doi: 10.3758/s13423-012-0367-y.
9
Google effects on memory: cognitive consequences of having information at our fingertips.谷歌对记忆的影响:信息随手可得对认知的影响。
Science. 2011 Aug 5;333(6043):776-8. doi: 10.1126/science.1207745. Epub 2011 Jul 14.
10
A new readability yardstick.一种新的可读性衡量标准。
J Appl Psychol. 1948 Jun;32(3):221-33. doi: 10.1037/h0057532.