Holst G J, Høst A, Doekes G, Meyer H W, Madsen A M, Plesner K B, Sigsgaard T
Section of Environment, Occupation and Health, Aarhus University, Aarhus C, Denmark.
H.C. Andersen Children's Hospital, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.
Indoor Air. 2016 Dec;26(6):880-891. doi: 10.1111/ina.12275. Epub 2016 Jan 5.
Little is known about the health effects of school-related indoor dampness and microbial exposures. In this study, we investigated dampness and dampness-related agents in both homes and schools and their association with allergy and respiratory health effects in 330 Danish pupils. Classroom dampness was identified based on technical inspection and bedroom dampness on parents' self-report. Classroom and bedroom dust was analyzed for seven microbial components. Skin prick testing determined atopic sensitization. Lung function was expressed as z-scores for forced expiratory volume in one-second (zFEV ), forced vital capacity (zFVC) and the ratio zFEV /zFVC using GLI-2012 prediction equations. The parents reported children's allergies, airway symptoms, and doctor-diagnosed asthma. High classroom dampness, but not bedroom dampness, was negatively associated with zFEV (β-coef. -0.71; 95% CI -1.17 to -0.23) and zFVC (β-coef. -0.52; 95% CI -0.98 to -0.06) and positively with wheezing (OR 8.09; 95% CI 1.49 to 43.97). No consistent findings were found between any individual microbial components or combination of microbial components and health outcomes. Among other indoor risk factors, environmental tobacco smoke (ETS) decreased zFEV (β-coef. -0.22; 95% CI -0.42 to -0.02) and zFEV /zFVCratio (β-coef. -0.26; 95% CI -0.44 to -0.07) and increased upper airway symptoms (OR 1.66; 95% CI 1.03-2.66). In conclusion, dampness in classrooms may have adverse respiratory health effects in pupils, but microbial agents responsible for this effect remain unknown.
关于与学校相关的室内潮湿和微生物暴露对健康的影响,我们所知甚少。在本研究中,我们调查了330名丹麦学生家中和学校的潮湿及与潮湿相关的因素,以及它们与过敏和呼吸道健康影响之间的关联。根据技术检查确定教室潮湿情况,根据家长的自我报告确定卧室潮湿情况。对教室和卧室灰尘中的七种微生物成分进行了分析。通过皮肤点刺试验确定特应性致敏情况。使用GLI - 2012预测方程,将肺功能表示为一秒用力呼气容积(zFEV)、用力肺活量(zFVC)的z分数以及zFEV/zFVC比值的z分数。家长报告了孩子的过敏情况、气道症状以及医生诊断的哮喘。教室高潮湿环境,但卧室潮湿环境并非如此,与zFEV(β系数 - 0.71;95%置信区间 - 1.17至 - 0.23)和zFVC(β系数 - 0.52;95%置信区间 - 0.98至 - 0.06)呈负相关,与喘息呈正相关(比值比8.09;95%置信区间1.49至43.97)。在任何单个微生物成分或微生物成分组合与健康结果之间均未发现一致的结果。在其他室内风险因素中,环境烟草烟雾(ETS)降低了zFEV(β系数 - 0.22;95%置信区间 - 0.42至 - 0.02)和zFEV/zFVC比值(β系数 - 0.26;95%置信区间 - 0.44至 - 0.07),并增加了上呼吸道症状(比值比1.66;95%置信区间1.03 - 2.66)。总之,教室潮湿可能对学生的呼吸道健康产生不利影响,但造成这种影响的微生物因素仍不清楚。